Unstructured Collaboration Versus Individual Practice for Complex Problem Solving: A Cautionary Tale

References

• American Psychological Association Online, President's Office. (2003). Education that works for all children. Retrieved December 27, 2003, from http://www.apa.org/about/president/initiavies.html
   Google Scholar
• Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of Learning Sciences, 12, 307-359.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, W. N. (2002). Differentiating instruction for students with learning disabilities: Best teaching practices for general and special educators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Billstein, R., Libeskind, S., & Lott, J. W. (1997). A problem solving approach to mathematics for elementary school teachers (6th ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Borresen, C. R. (1990). Success in introductory statistics with small groups. College Teaching, 38, 26-28.
   Google Scholar
• Brinckerhoff, L. C. (1996). Making the transition to higher education: Opportunities for student empowerment. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 118-136.
   Google Scholar
• Calhoon, M. B., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). The effects of peer-assisted learning strategies and curriculum-based measurement on the mathematics performance of secondary students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 235-245.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. In E. Dubinsky, D. Mathews, & B. E. Reynolds (Eds.), Readings in cooperative learning for undergraduate mathematics (pp. 135-156). Washington, DC: Mathematics Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dansereau, D. F. (1988). Cooperative learning strategies. In C. E. Weinstein, E. T. Goetz, & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation (pp. 103-120). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dees, R. L. (1991). The role of cooperative learning in increasing problem-solving ability in a college remedial course. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 409-421.
   Google Scholar
• Fantuzzo, J. W., Dimeff, L. A., & Fox, S. L. (1989). Reciprocal peer tutoring: A multimodal assessment of effectiveness with college students. Teaching of Psychology, 16, 133-135.
   Google Scholar
• Fantuzzo, J. W., Riggio, R. E., Connelly, S., & Dimeff, L. A. (1989). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on academic achievement and psychological adjustment: A component analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 173-177.
   Google Scholar
• Frierson, H. T., Jr. (1987). Academic performance in predominantly black nursing classes: Effects associated with intervention designed for standardized test preparation. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 20, 37-40.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Burish, P. (2000). Peer-assisted learning strategies: An evidence-based practice to promote reading achievement. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 85-91.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Karns, K. (2001). Enhancing kindergartners' mathematical development: Effects of peer-assisted learning strategies. Elementary School Journal, 101, 495-510.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. III, Cartledge, G., Seidl, B., Woolsey, M. L., Schley, G. S., & Utley, C. A. (2001). Mount Olivet after-school program: Peer-mediated interventions for at-risk students. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 22-33.
   Google Scholar
• Golbeck, S. L., & Sinagra, K. (2000). Effects of gender and collaboration on college students' performance on a Piagetian spatial task. The Journal of Experimental Education, 69, 22-35.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, P., Keith, R., & Anderson, S. (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping: Part 1. Group versus individual problem solving. American Journal of Physics, 60, 627-636.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, D., & Tudge, J. R. H. (1999). Implications of Vygotsky's theory for peer learning. In A. M. O'Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 39-65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1990). Cooperative learning and achievement. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and research (pp. 23-37). New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Education Theory Research and Development, 45, 65-94.
   Google Scholar
• Keeler, C. M., & Steinhorst, R. K. (1994). Cooperative learning in statistics. Teaching Statistics, 16, 81-84.
   Google Scholar
• Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Spencer, V., & Fontana, J. (2003). Promoting success in high school world history: Peer tutoring versus guided notes. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 52-65.
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, J. M., Mathot-Buckner, C., Thorson, N., & Fister, S. (2001). Supporting the inclusion of students with moderate and severe disabilities in junior high school general education classes: The effects of classwide peer tutoring, multi-element curriculum, and accommodations. Education and Treatment of Children, 24, 141-160.
   Google Scholar
• Lew, M., Mesch, D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1986). Positive interdependence, academic and collaborative-skills group contingencies, and isolated students. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 476-488.
   Google Scholar
• Norwood, K. S. (1995). The effects of the use of problem solving and cooperative learning on the mathematics achievement of underprepared college freshmen. Primus, 5, 229-252.
   Google Scholar
• O'Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F., Hythecker, V. I., Larson, C. O., Rocklin, T. R., Lambiotte, J. G., et al. (1986). The effects of monitoring on cooperative learning. The Journal of Experimental Education, 54, 169-173.
   Google Scholar
• O'Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F., Rocklin, T., Hythecker, V. I., Young, M. D., Hall, R. H., et al. (1988a). Cooperative procedural learning: Effects of prompting and pre- versus distributed planning activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 167-171.
   Google Scholar
• O'Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F., Rocklin, T., Hythecker, V. I., Young, M. D., Hall, R. H., et al. (1988b). Promoting functional literacy through cooperative learning. Journal of Reading Behavior, 20, 339-356.
   Google Scholar
• Polya, M. (1957). How to solve it (2nd ed.) New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Reglin, G. L. (1990). The effects of individualized and cooperative computer assisted instruction on mathematics achievement and mathematics anxiety for prospective teachers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23, 404-412.
   Google Scholar
• Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1996). Computing contrasts, effect sizes, and counternulls on other people's published data: General procedures for research consumers. Psychological Methods, 1, 331-340.
   Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, M. J. (1977). Misconceptions of probability: An experiment with a small-group, activity-based, model building approach to introductory probability at the college level. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 8, 295-316.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (1992). When and why does cooperative learning increase achievement? Theoretical and empirical perspectives. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 145-173). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 43-69.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. E., Hinckley, C. C., & Volk, G. L. (1991). Cooperative learning in the undergraduate laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 68, 413-415.
   Google Scholar
• Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 21-51.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M. (1985). Student interaction and learning in groups: A research summary. In R. Slavin, S. Sharan, J. Kagan, R. Hertz-Lazarowitz, C. Webb, & R. Schmuck (Eds.), Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn (pp. 147-172). New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M. (1992). Testing a theoretical model of student interaction and learning in small groups. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 145-173). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yueh, J., & Alessi, S. (1988). The effect of reward structure and group ability composition on cooperative computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 15, 18-22.
   Google Scholar