Utilization of Sample Weights in Single-Level Structural Equation Modeling

References

• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
   Google Scholar
• Association for Institutional Research. (n.d.). AIR summer institutes. Retrieved July 19, 2004, from http://www.airweb.org/page.asp?page=473
   Google Scholar
• B. Byrne M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• du Toit, S., & Mels, G. (2002). Supplementary notes on multiple imputation. Retrieved September 21, 2005, from http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/imputation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DuMouchel, W. H., & Duncan, G. J. (1983). Using sample survey weights in multiple regression analyses of stratified samples. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78(383), 535-543.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, X. (2001). The effect of parental involvement on high school students' academic achievement: A growth modeling analysis. The Journal of Experimental Education, 70, 27-61.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, R., Berkner, L., Horn, L., Choy, S., & Hoachlander, G. (1994). Descriptive summary of the 1989-90 postsecondary students two years after entry: Contractor report (No. 94-386). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Hahs, D. L. (2003). The utilization of sample weights in structural equation modeling: An application using the Beginning Postsecondary Students Longitudinal Study 1990/92/94. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama.
   Google Scholar
• Hahs-Vaughn, D. L. (2005). A primer for using and understanding weights with national datasets. The Journal of Experimental Education, 73(3), 221-248.
   Google Scholar
• Hahs-Vaughn, D. L. (in press). Weighting omissions and best practices when using national datasets in educational research. Professional File.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, P. W., & Goldstein, H. (1998). Multilevel modeling of educational data with cross-classification and missing identification units. Journal of Education and Behavioral Statistics, 23(1), 117-128.
   Google Scholar
• Horvitz, D. G., & Thompson, D. J. (1952). A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47, 663-685.
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J., & Kreft, I. G. G. (1994). Multilevel analysis methods. Sociological Methods and Research, 22(3), 283-299.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 76-99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, G., Salvucci, S., Peng, S., & Owings, J. (1996). National Educational Longitudinal Study of 1988 (NELS:88) research framework and issues (Working Paper No. 96-03). Arlington, VA: Synetics for Management Decisions.
   Google Scholar
• Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1996). PRELIS 2 user's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kalton, G. (1983). Models in the practice of survey sampling. International Statistical Review, 51, 175-188.
   Google Scholar
• Kalton, G. (1989). Modeling considerations: Discussion from a survey sampling perspective. In D. Kasprzyk, G. Duncan, G. Kalton, & M. Singh (Eds.), Panel surveys (pp. 575-585). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D., & Elliott, P. R. (1997a). A didactic example of multilevel structural equation modeling applicable to the study of organizations. Structural Equation Modeling, 4(1), 1-24.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D., & Elliott, P. R. (1997b). A model-based approach to validating education indicators using multilevel structural equation modeling. Journal of Education and Behavioral Statistics, 22(3), 323-347.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D., & Ferguson, A. J. (1999). On the utilization of sample weights in latent variable models. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(4), 305-321.
   Google Scholar
• Kish, L. (1965). Survey sampling. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kish, L., & Frankel, M. R. (1974). Inference from complex samples. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 36, 1-37.
   Google Scholar
• Korn, E. L., & Graubard, B. I. (1991). Epidemiologic studies utilizing surveys: Accounting for the sampling design. American Journal of Public Health, 81(9), 1166-1173.
   Google Scholar
• Korn, E. L., & Graubard, B. I. (1995a). Analysis of large health surveys: Accounting for the sampling design. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society), 158(2), 263-295.
   Google Scholar
• Korn, E. L., & Graubard, B. I. (1995b). Examples of differing weighted and unweighted estimates from a sample survey. American Statistician, 49, 291-305.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E. S., Forthofer, R. N., & Lorimor, R. J. (1989). Analyzing complex survey data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lomax, R. G. (2001). An introduction to statistical concepts for education and behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Muthen, B. O. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 22(3), 376-398.
   Google Scholar
• Muthen, B. O., & Satorra, A. (1995). Complex sample data in structural equation modeling. Sociological Methodology, 25, 267-316.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, S. S. (2000, July). Technical issues in using NCES data. Paper presented at the AIR/NCES National Data Institute on the Use of Postsecondary Databases, Gaithersburg, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Perna, L. (2003). The status of women and minorities among community college faculty. Research in Higher Education, 44(2), 205-240.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffermann, D. (1993). The role of sampling weights when modeling survey data. International Statistical Review, 61(2), 317-337.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffermann, D., Skinner, C. J., Holmes, D. J., Goldstein, H., & Rasbash, J. (1998). Weighting for unequal selection probabilities in multilevel models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 60(1), 23-40.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, D. J., Whitmore, R. W., Wine, J. S., Blackwell, K. M., Forsyth, B. H., Smith, T. K., et al. (1996). Beginning postsecondary students longitudinal study second follow-up (BPS:90/92/94) final technical report. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Schenker, N., & Gentleman, J. F. (2001). On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals. The American Statistician, 55(3), 182-187.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, C. J., Holt, D., & Smith, T. M. F. (Eds.). (1989). Analysis of complex samples. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Stapleton, L. M. (2002). The incorporation of sample weights into multilevel structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(4), 475-502.
   Google Scholar
• Terenzini, P. R., Springer, L., Yaeger, P. M., Pascarella, E. T., & Nora, A. (1996). First-generation college students: Characteristics, experiences, and cognitive development. Research in Higher Education, 37(1), 1-22.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, S. L., & Heck, R. H. (2001). Analysis of large-scale secondary data in higher education research: Potential perils associated with complex sampling designs. Research in Higher Education, 42(5), 517-540.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2004). User's manual for the ECLS-K third grade public-use data file and electronic code book (No. NCES 2004-001). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar