How Best to Remove the Snare From the Pair: Construction and Cognitive Load Hypotheses

References

• Alesandrini, K. (1984). Pictures and adult learning. Instructional Science, 13, 63-77.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R. (1990). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Anglin, J. M. (1977). Word, object and conceptual development. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Barringer, C., & Gholson, B. (1979). Effects of type and combination of feedback upon conceptual learning by children: Implications for research in academic learning. Review of Educational Research, 49, 459-478.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717-726.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. S., & Perry, F. L., Jr. (1991). A comparison of three learning strategies for ESL vocabulary acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 655-670.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, D. P., Ugel, N., Thompson, S., & Hamff, A. (1999). Strategies to promote content-area reading instruction. Intervention in School and Clinic, 34, 293-302.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, R. N., & Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students' learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 5-26.
   Google Scholar
• Coady, J. (1997). L2 vocabulary acquisition. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• David, P. (1998). News concreteness and visual-verbal association: Do news pictures narrow the recall gap between concrete and abstract news? Human Communication Research, 25, 180-201.
   Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., & Reich, P. A. (1981). Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 611-629.
   Google Scholar
• Dempster, F. N. (1985). Proactive interference in sentence recall: Topics similarity effects and individual differences. Memory and Cognition, 13, 81-89.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. W., & Monaghan, J. (2002). Reply to Strain, Patterson, and Seidenberg. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 215-220.
   Google Scholar
• Frauenfelder, U. H., Baayen, R. H., Hellwig, F. M., & Schreuder, R. (1993). Neighborhood density and frequency across languages and modalities. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 781-804.
   Google Scholar
• Gagne, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Igo, L. B., Kiewra, K. A., & Bruning, R. H. (2004). Removing the snare from the pair: Using pictures to learn confusing word pairs. Journal of Experimental Education, 72, 162-178.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, S. J., & Duffelmeyer, F. A. (1996). Enhancing possible sentences through cooperative learning. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 39, 658-659.
   Google Scholar
• Jescheniak, J., & Levelt, W. (1994). Word effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of morphological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 1-20.
   Google Scholar
• Landauer, S., & Streeter, L. (1973). Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 119-131.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, J., & Mayer, R. E. (1993). Understanding illustrations in text. In B. K. Britton, A. Woodward, & M. Brinkley (Eds.), Learning from textbooks (pp. 95-113). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, J. R., McCormick, C. B., Miller, G. E., Berry, J. K., & Pressley, M. (1982). Mnemonic versus nonmnemonic vocabulary learning strategies for children. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 121-136.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 312-320.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia environments. In R. Bruning, C. A. Horn, & L. M. PytlikZillig (Eds.), Web-based learning: What do we know? Where do we go? (pp. 23-34). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Misulis, K. (1999). Making vocabulary development manageable in content instruction. Contemporary Education, 70(2), 25-30.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 358-368.
   Google Scholar
• Mousavi, S., Low, R., & Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 319-334.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson-Heber, J. (1986). Expanding and refining vocabulary in content areas. Journal of Reading, 29, 626-633.
   Google Scholar
• O'Donnell, A. M., & O'Kelly, J. (1994). Learning from peers: Beyond the rhetoric of positive results. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 321-349.
   Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (2000). Distortions of memory. In F. I. M. Craik & E. Tulving (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 149-164). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rupley, W. H., Logan, J. W., & Nichols, W. D. (1999). Vocabulary instruction in a balanced reading program. Reading Teacher, 52(4), 336-347.
   Google Scholar
• Sadoski, M. (2005). A dual coding view of vocabulary learning. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 21, 221-238.
   Google Scholar
• Sadoski, M., Goetz, E. T., & Rodriguez, M. (2000). Engaging texts: Effects of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest, and recall in four text types. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 85-95.
   Google Scholar
• Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2001). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Soloman, K. O., Medin, D. L., & Lynch, E. (1999). Concepts do more than categorize. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 99-104.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A. (1986). Three principles of effective vocabulary instruction. Journal of Reading, 29, 662-668.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Camberwell, Australia: ACER Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tennyson, R. D., & Cocchiarella, M. (1986). An empirically based instructional design theory for teaching concepts. Review of Educational Research, 56, 40-71.
   Google Scholar