Effects of Response Priming and Inhibition on Movement Planning and Execution

References

• Abrams, R. A., & Dobkin, R. S. (1994). Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 467-477.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, P. J., & Pratt, J. (2001). The spaital distribution of inhibition of return. Psychological Science, 12, 76-80.
   Google Scholar
• Briand, K. A., Larrison, A. L., & Sereno A. B. (2000). Inhibition of return in manual and saccadic response systems. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 1512-1524.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, R. G. (1996). Putative right hemisphere contributions to the preparation of reaching and aiming movements. In D. Elliott & E. A. Roy (Eds.), Manual asymmetries in motor performance (pp. 159-172). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chua, R., & Elliott, D. (1993). Visual regulation of manual aiming. Human Movement Science, 12, 365-401.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, R., Coles, M. G., Logan, G. D., & Gratton, G. (1990). In search of the point of no return: The control of response processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 164-182.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, D., & Chua, R. (1996). Manual asymmetries in goaldirected movement. In D. Elliott & E. A. Roy (Eds.), Manual asymmetries in motor performance (pp. 143-158). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, D., Helsen, W. F., & Chua, R. (2001). A century later: Woodworth's (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 342-357.
   Google Scholar
• Georgeoplous, A. P. (1990). Neurophysiology of reaching. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and performance XIII (pp. 227-263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Helsen, W. F., Elliott, D., Starkes, J. L., & Ricker, K. L. (2000). Coupling of eye, finger, elbow, and shoulder movements during manual aiming. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 241-248.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, L. A., Lupiáñez, J., & Tipper, S. P. (1999). Inhibition of return in a selective reaching task: An investigation of reference frames. Journal of General Psychology, 126, 421-442.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, L. A., & Tipper, S. P. (1997). Hand deviations away from visual cues: Indirect evidence for inhibition. Experimental Brain Research, 113, 144-152.
   Google Scholar
• Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In J. Long & A. Baddley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 138-147.
   Google Scholar
• Maylor, E. A. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner, & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 189-204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McGarry, T., & Franks, I. M. (1997). A horse race between independent processes: Evidence for a phantom point of no return in the preparation of a speeded response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1533-1542.
   Google Scholar
• Meegan, D. V., & Tipper, S. P. (1998). Reaching into cluttered environments: Spatial and temporal influences of distracting objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 225-249.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211-228.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, J., & Abrams, R. A. (1994). Action-centered inhibition: Effects of distractors on movement planning and execution. Human Movement Science, 13, 245-254.
   Google Scholar
• Rafal, R. D., Calabresi, P. A., Brennan, C. W., & Sciolto, T. K. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 673-685.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., & Ogden, W. C. (1978). Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In H. Pick & E. Saltzman (Eds.), Modes of perceiving and processing information (pp. 137-157). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., & Sheliga, B. M. (1994). Space and selective attention. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and Performance. XV (pp. 231-265). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, D. A. (1980). Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction, and extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 444-474.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, D. A., & Kornblum, S. (1982). A priming method for investigating the selection of motor responses. Acta Psychologica, 51, 223-243.
   Google Scholar
• Tipper, S. P., Howard, L. A., & Houghton, G. (1999). Behavioral consequences of selection form neural population codes. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 223-245). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tipper, S. P., Howard, L. A., & Jackson, S. R. (1997). Selective reaching to grasp: Evidence for distractor interference effects. Visual Cognition, 4, 1-38.
   Google Scholar
• Tipper, S. P., Lortie, C., & Baylis, G. C. (1992). Selective reaching: Evidence for action-centered attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 891-905.
   Google Scholar
• Weir, P. L., Weeks, D. J., Welsh, T. N., Elliott, D., Chua, R., Roy, E. A., et al. (2003). Action-centred distractor effects in discrete control selection. Experimental Brain Research, 149, 207-213.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, T. N., & Elliott, D. (2003). The effects of response priming on movement planning and execution in cluttered environments. (Manuscript submitted for publication.)
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, T. N. & Elliott, D. (in press). Movement trajectories in the presence of a distracting stimulus: Evidence for a response activation model of selective reaching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, T. N., Elliott, D. & Weeks, D. J. (1999). Hand deviations toward distractors: Evidence for response competition. Experimental Brain Research 127, 207-212.
   Google Scholar