Alternate-Response Preparation in a Visuomotor Serial Task

References

• Anllo-Vento, L., Luck, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (1998). Spatio-temporal dynamics of attention to color: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Human Brain Mapping, 6, 216-218.
   Google Scholar
• Bertelson, P., & Renkin, A. (1966). Reaction times to new versus repeated signals in a serial task as a function of response-signal time interval. Acta Psychologica, 25, 132-136.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, V., Fan, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (1995). Identification of early visual evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses. Human Brain Mapping, 2, 170-187.
   Google Scholar
• Coles, M. G., Gratton, G., & Donchin, E. (1988). Detecting early communication: Using measures of movement-related potentials to illuminate human information processing. Biological Psychology, 26, 69-89.
   Google Scholar
• Csibra, G., Johnson, M. H., & Tucker, L. (1997). Attention and oculomotor control: A high-density study of the gap effect. Neuropsychology, 3(6), 855-865.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, R., Wierda, M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1988). Use of partial stimulus information in response processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 682-692.
   Google Scholar
• Delinte, A., Gómez, C. M., Decostre, M. F., Crommelinck, M., & Roucoux, A. (2002). Amplitude transition function of human express saccades. Neuroscience Research, 42(2), 21-34.
   Google Scholar
• Destrebecqz, A., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(2), 343-350.
   Google Scholar
• Eimer, M. (1998). The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of central response activation processes. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Compuers, 30, 146-156.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, B., & Weber, H. (1993). Express saccades and visual attention. Behavioral Brain Science, 16, 553-610.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, M. E., & Segraves, M. A. (1987). Visuospatial and motor attention in the monkey. Neuropsychologia, 251(1A), 107-118.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez, C. M., Atienza, M., Gómez, G. J., & Vázquez, M. (1996). Response latencies and event-related potentials during the gap paradigm using saccadic responses in human subjects. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 23, 91-99.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez, C. M., Clark, V. P., Fan, S., Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Sources of attention-sensitive visual event-related potentials. Brain Topography, 7(1), 41-51.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez, C. M., Marco, J., & Grau, C. (2003). Visuo-motor cortical network of the contingent negative variation. NeuroImage, 20(1), 216-224.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez, C. M., Millán, S., Atienza, M., Aguilar, H., & Delinte, A. (1998). The gap effect during visual and auditory stimulation using manual responses. Biological Psychology, 47, 77-96.
   Google Scholar
• Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001). Computational modelling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 194-203.
   Google Scholar
• Jentzsch, I., & Sommer, W. (2001). Sequence-sensitive subcomponents of P300: Topographical analyses and dipole source localization. Psychophysiology, 38(4), 607-621.
   Google Scholar
• Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology, 31(3), 291-308.
   Google Scholar
• Mangun, G. (1995). Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. Psychophysiology, 32, 4-18.
   Google Scholar
• Pashler, H., & Baylis, G. (1991). Procedural learning: 2. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(1), 33-48.
   Google Scholar
• Polk, T. A., Stallcup, M., Aguirre, G. K., Alsop, D. C., D'Esposito, M., Detre, J. A., et al. (2002). Neural specialization for letter recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14(2), 145-159.
   Google Scholar
• Praamstra, P., & Oostenveld, R. (2003). Attention and movement-related motor cortex activation: A high-density EEG study of spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 309-322.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, J. R., & Craft, J. L. (1989). The effect of prediction accuracy on choice reaction time. Memory and Cognition, 17(4), 503-508.
   Google Scholar
• Soetens, E. (1997). Localizing sequential effects in serial choice reaction time with the information reduction procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(2), 547-568.
   Google Scholar
• Willingham, D. B., Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1989). On the development of procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 15(6), 1047-1060.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez, C. M., Delinte, A., Vaquero, E., Vázquez, M., Atienza, M., Millán, S., et al. (2002). Sensory and motor, attentional modulation in the manual gap effect. A high-density ERP study. Experimental Brain Research, 142, 385-394.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez, C. M., Delinte, A., Vaquero, E., Vázquez, M., Cardoso, M. J., Crommelinck, M., et al. (2001). Preparatory activation of a dynamic visuo-motor cortical network in human subjects. Brain Topography, 13(3), 149-159.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, N. H. (1980). Sequential effects in choice reaction time. In A. T. Welford (Ed.), Reaction times (pp. 129-172). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valle-Inclán, F. (1996). The locus of interference in the Simon effect: An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 43(2), 147-162.
   Google Scholar
• Leuthold, H., & Sommer, W. (1993). Stimulus presentation rate dissociates sequential effects in event-related potentials and reaction time. Psychophysiology, 30, 510-517.
   Google Scholar