Temporal Dissociation Between Distractors and Targets: The Impact of Residual Distractor Processing on Target Responses

References

• Beck, D. M., & Lavie, N. (2005). Look here, but ignore what you see: Effects of distractors at fixation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 592-607.
   Google Scholar
• Chelazzi, L., Miller, E. K., Duncan, J., & Desimone, R. (1993). A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex. Nature, 363, 245-347.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, J., Ward, R., & Shapiro, K. (1994). Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision. Nature, 369, 313-315.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a non-search task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1972). Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 201-204.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, C. W., & St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 225-240.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, C. W., & Yeh, Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 583-597.
   Google Scholar
• Flowers, J. H., & Wilcox, N. (1982). The effect of flanking context on visual classification: The joint contribution of interactions at different processing levels. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 681-591.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (2001). Detection by action: Neuropsychological evidence for action-defined templates in search. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 84-88.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & D. A. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29-61). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Burkell, J. (1983). The cost of visual filtering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 510-522.
   Google Scholar
• Kritikos, A., Bennett, K. M. B., Dunai, J., & Castiello, U. (2000). Interference from distractors in reach-to-grasp movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 131-151.
   Google Scholar
• Kritikos, A., & Beresford, M. (2002). Tactile interference in visually guided reach-to-grasp movements. Experimental Brain Research, 95, 1-13.
   Google Scholar
• Kritikos, A., Mattingley, J. B. M., & Breen, N. (2005). Anarchic hand syndrome: Bimanual coordination and sensitivity to irrelevant information in unimanual reaches. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 634-647.
   Google Scholar
• Lavie, N., & Tsal, Y. (1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 183-197.
   Google Scholar
• Mattingley, J. B., Corben, L. A., Bradshaw, J. A., Phillips, J. G., & Horne, M. K. (1998). The effects of competition and motor reprogramming on visuomotor selection in unilateral neglect. Experimental Brain Research, 120, 246-256.
   Google Scholar
• Olivers, C. N. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2003). Visual marking inhibits singleton capture. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 1-42.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, J., & Abrams, A. (1994). Action-centered inhibition: Effects of distractors on movement planning and execution. Human Movement Science, 13, 245-354.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 378-387.
   Google Scholar
• Riddoch, M. J., Humphreys, G. W., & Edwards, M. G. (2000). Neuropsychological evidence distinguishing object selection from action (effector) selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 547-562.
   Google Scholar
• Rorden, C., Mattingley, J. B., Karnath, H.-O., & Driver, J. (1997). Visual extinction and prior entry: Impaired perception of temporal order with intact motion perception after unilateral parietal damage. Neuropsychologia, 35, 421-433.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, C., Pavani, F., & Driver, J. (2000). Crossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1298-1319.
   Google Scholar
• Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 642-662.
   Google Scholar
• Tipper, S. P., Howard, L. A., & Jackson, G. M. (1997). Selective reaching to grasp: Evidence for distractor interference effects. Visual Cognition, 4, 1-38.
   Google Scholar
• Tipper, S. P., Howard, L. A., & Meegan, D. V. (1998). Mechanisms of selective attention gain access to hand-centred frames of reference: Evidence from interference and negative priming effects. In S. P. Tipper & S. R. Jackson (Eds.), Vision and action: Advances in cognition series. London: University College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. (2006). How the deployment of visual attention determines what we see. Visual Cognition, 14(4-8), 411-443.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Visual marking of moving objects: A role for top-down feature-based inhibition of selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 946-962.
   Google Scholar