Contextual Interference Effect: Elaborative Processing or Forgetting—Reconstruction? A Post Hoc Analysis of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation—Induced Effects on Motor Learning

References

• Berardelli, A., Inghilleri, M., Polidori, L., Priori, A., Mercuri, B., & Manfredi, M. (1994). Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on single and sequential arm movements. Experimental Brain Research, 98, 501-506.
   Google Scholar
• Boroojerdi, B., Phipps, M., Kopylev, L., Wharton, C. M., Cohen, L. G., & Grafman, J. (2001). Enhancing analogic reasoning with rTMS over the left prefrontal cortex. Neurology, 56, 526-528.
   Google Scholar
• Flitman, S. S., Grafmann, J., Wassermann, E. M., Cooper, V., O'Grady, J., Pascual-Leone, A., et al. (1998). Linguistic processing during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology, 50, 175-181.
   Google Scholar
• Giuffrida, C. G., Shea, J. B., & Fairbrother, J. T. (2002). Differential transfer benefits of increased practice for constant, blocked, and serial practice schedules. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 353-365.
   Google Scholar
• Guadagnoli, M. A., & Lee, T. D. (2004). Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 212-224.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, K. G., & Magill, R. A. (1995). Variability of practice and contextual interference in motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 299-309.
   Google Scholar
• Hallett, M. (2000, July 13). Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain. Nature, 406, 147-150.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kamen, G. (2004). Reliability of motor-evoked potentials during resting and active contraction conditions. Medicine Science in Sports and Exercise, 36, 1574-1579.
   Google Scholar
• Kaneko, K., Kawai, S., Fuchigami, Y., Morita, H., & Ofuji, A. (1996). The effect of current direction induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation on the corticospinal excitability in human brain. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 101, 478-482.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T. D., & Magill, R. A. (1983). The locus of contextual interference in motor-skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 9, 730-746.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T. D., & Magill, R. A. (1985). Can forgetting facilitate skill acquisition? In D. Goodman, R. B. Wilberg, & I. M. Franks (Eds.), Differing perspectives in motor learning, memory, and control (pp. 3-21). New York: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T. D., Wishart, L. R., Cunningham, S., & Carnahan, H. (1997). Modeled timing information during random practice eliminates the contextual interference effect. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 100-105.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., & Wright, D. L. (2000). An assessment of the attention demands during random- and blocked-practice schedules. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 53, 591-606.
   Google Scholar
• Meira, C. M., Jr., & Tani, G. (2001). The contextual interference effect in acquisition of dart-throwing skill tested on a transfer test with extended trials. Perceptual Motor Skills, 92, 910-918.
   Google Scholar
• Pascual-Leone, A., Brasil-Neto, J. P., Valls-Sole, J., Cohen, L. G., & Hallett, M. (1992). Simple reaction time to focal transcranial magnetic stimulation. Comparison with reaction time to acoustic, visual and somatosensory stimuli. Brain, 115, 109-122.
   Google Scholar
• Pascual-Leone, A., Houser, C. M., Grafman, J., & Hallett, M. (1992). Reaction time and transcranial magnetic stimulation. Lancet, 339, 1420.
   Google Scholar
• Perez, C. R., Meira, C. M., Jr., & Tani, G. (2005). Does the contextual interference effect last over extended transfer trials? Perceptual Motor Skills, 100, 58-60.
   Google Scholar
• Rossini, P. M., Barker, A. T., Berardelli, A., Caramia, M. D., Caruso, G., Cracco, R. Q., et al. (1994). Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 91, 79-92.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, J. B., & Morgan, R. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 179-187.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, J. B., & Titzer, R. C. (1993). The influence of reminder trials on contextual interference effects. Journal of Motor Behavior, 25, 264-274.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, J. B., & Zimny, S. T. (1983). Contextual effects in memory and learning movement information. In R. A. Magill (Ed.), Memory and control of action (pp. 345-366). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, J. B., & Zimny, S. T. (1988). Knowledge incorporation in motor representation. In O. G. Meijer, & K. Roth (Eds.), Complex movement behavior: "The" motor-action controversy (pp. 289-314). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. L., Wagener, D. S., & Colebatch, J. G. (1995). Mapping of cortical sites where transcranial magnetic stimulation results in delay of voluntary movement. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 97, 341-348.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. R., Salazar, W., & Landers, D. M. (1991). What is missing in p less than .05? Effect size. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sports, 62, 344-348.
   Google Scholar
• Wassermann, E. M. (1998). Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: Report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 108, 1-16.
   Google Scholar
• Weekley, A. (2004). TEMPLATE. Garden Grove, CA: Weekley Consulting.
   Google Scholar
• Werhahn, K. J., Fong, J. K., Meyer, B. U., Priori, A., Rothwell, J. C., Day, B. L., et al. (1994). The effect of magnetic coil orientation on the latency of surface EMG and single motor unit responses in the first dorsal interosseous muscle. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 93, 138-146.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, D. L., Magnuson, C. E., & Black, C. B. (2005). Programming and reprogramming sequence timing following high and low contextual interference practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sports, 76, 258-266.
   Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., Schmidt, R. A., & Deubel, H. (1993). Reduced feedback frequency enhances generalized motor program learning but not parameterization learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1134-1150.
   Google Scholar
• Ziemann, U., Hallett, M., & Cohen, L. G. (1998). Mechanisms of deafferentation-induced plasticity in human motor cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 7000-7007.
   Google Scholar
• Ziemann, U., Ilic, T. V., Pauli, C., Meintzschel, F., & Ruge, D. (2004). Learning modifies subsequent induction of long-term potentiation-like and long-term depression-like plasticity in human motor cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 1666-1672.
   Google Scholar