Environmental Concern and Sociodemographic Variables: A Study of Statistical Models

References

• Arcury, T. A., & Christianson, E. H. (1993). Rural and urban differences in environmental knowledge and action. Journal of Environmental Education, 25, 19-25.
   Google Scholar
• Arcury, T. A., Scollay, S. J., & Johnson, T. P. (1987). Sex differences in environmental concern and knowledge: The case of acid rain. Sex Roles, 16, 463-472.
   Google Scholar
• Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blocker, T. J., & Eckberg, D. L. (1997). Gender and environmentalism: Results from the 1993 General Social Survey—research on the environment. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 841-858.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Brant, R. (1990). Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression. Biometrics, 46, 1171-1178.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham-Hatfield, S. (2000). Gender and environment. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buttel, F. H. (1987). New directions in environmental sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 465-488.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E. (1975). The impact of political orientation on environmental attitudes and actions. Environment and Behavior, 7, 428-454.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., & Jones, R. E. (2002). Environmental concern: Conceptual and measurement issues. In R. E. Dunlap & W. Michelson (Eds.), Handbook of environmental sociology (pp. 482-524). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1984). Commitment to the dominant social paradigm and concern for environmental quality. Social Science Quarterly, 65, 1013-1028.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm—a revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425-442.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., Xiao, C., & McCright, A. M. (2001). Politics and environment in America: Partisan and ideological cleavages in public support for environmentalism. Environmental Politics, 10(4), 23-48.
   Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, A. (1995). Taking stock of two decades of research on the social bases of environmental concern. In M. D. Mehta & E. Ouellet (Eds.), Environmental sociology: Theory and practice (pp. 125-152). Ontario, Canada: Captus Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guber, D. L. (1996). Environmental concern and the dimensionality problem. Social Science Quarterly, 77, 644-662.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L. C. (1992). Regression with graphics. Belmont, CA: Duxbury.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. E., & Dunlap, R. E. (1992). The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time? Rural Sociology, 57, 28-47.
   Google Scholar
• Keeter, S. (1984). Problematic pollution polls. Political Methodology, 10, 267-291.
   Google Scholar
• Klineberg, S. L., McKeever, M., & Rothenbach, B. (1998). Demographic predictors of environmental concern. Social Science Quarterly, 79, 734-753.
   Google Scholar
• Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2001). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using STATA. College Station, TX: STATA Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, W. L., & Hara, N. (1994). Gender differences in environmental concern among college students. Sex Roles, 31, 369-374.
   Google Scholar
• Malinvaud, E. (1980). Statistical methods of econometrics. New York: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• McEvoy, J., III. (1972). The American concern with the environment. In W. R. Burch, Jr., N. H. Cheek, Jr., & L. Taylor (Eds.), Social behavior, natural resources, and the environment. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Mohai, P. (1992). Men, women, and the environment: An examination of the gender gap in environmental concern and activism. Society and Natural Resources, 5, 1-19.
   Google Scholar
• Powers, D. A., & Xie, Y. (2000). Statistical methods for categorical data analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25, 322-348.
   Google Scholar
• Tognacci, L. N., Weigel, R. H., Wideen, M. F., & Vernon, D. T. A. (1972). Environmental quality: How universal is public concern? Environment and Behavior, 4, 73-86.
   Google Scholar
• Uyeki, E. S., & Holland, L. J. (2000). Diffusion of pro-environment attitudes? American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 646-662.
   Google Scholar
• Van Liere, K. D., & Dunlap, R. E. (1980). The social bases of environmental concern. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 181-197.
   Google Scholar
• Van Liere, K. D., & Dunlap, R. E. (1981). Environmental concern: Does it make a difference how it's measured? Environment and Behavior, 13, 651-676.
   Google Scholar
• Weigel, R. H. (1977). Ideological and demographic correlates of proecology behavior. Journal of Social Psychology, 103, 39-47.
   Google Scholar
• Widegren, O. (1988). The new environmental paradigm and personal norms. Environment and Behavior, 30, 75-100.
   Google Scholar