670
Views
48
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Factors Associated With K-12 Teachers' Use of Environment-Based Education

Pages 15-32 | Published online: 07 Aug 2010

References

  • Ammon, M., Furco, A., Chi, B., & Middaugh, E. (2002). Service-learning in California: A profile of the CalServe servicelearning partnerships (1997-2000). Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Archie, M. (2001, August). Moving into the educational mainstream. An Information Brief of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 26. Alexandria, VA: Author.
  • Athman, J., & Monroe, M. (2004). The effects of environment-based education on students' achievement motivation. Journal of Interpretation Research, 9(1), 9-25.
  • Bartosh, O. (2004). Environmental education: Improving student achievement. Unpublished master's thesis, The Evergreen State College, Olympia, Washington.
  • Cheak, M., Volk, T., & Hungerford, H. (2002). Molokai: An investment in children, the community, and the environment. Carbondale, IL: Center for Instruction, Staff Development, and Evaluation.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  • Disinger, J., & Monroe, M. (1994). Defining environmental education: An EE toolbox workshop resource manual. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan National Consortium for Environmental Education and Training.
  • Ernst, J. (2005). A formative evaluation of the prairie science class. Journal of Interpretation Research, 10(1), 9-29.
  • Ernst, J., & Monroe, M. (2004). The effects of environment-based education on students' critical thinking skills and disposition toward critical thinking. Environmental Education Research, 10, 507-522.
  • Franklin, J. (2004, Summer). Planting the seeds of knowledge: How environmental literacy helps students achieve. ASCD Curriculum Update. (Summer 2004). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Glenn, L. (2000). Environment-based education: Creating high performance schools and students. Washington, DC: National Environmental Education and Training Foundation.
  • Ham, S., & Sewing, D. (1988). Barriers to environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 19(2), 17-24.
  • Harvard Graduate School of Education for the Rural Trust. (1999). Living and learning in rural schools and communities: Lessons from the field. Cambridge, MA: Author.
  • Hungerford, H., Litherland, R., Peyton, R., Ramsey, J., & Volk, T. (2003). Investigating and evaluating environmental issues and actions: Skill development program. Champaign, IL: Stripes.
  • Hungerford, H., Peyton, B., & Wilke, R. (1980). Goals for curriculum development in environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8-21.
  • Lane, J., & Wilke, R. (1994). Environmental education in Wisconsin: A teacher survey. The Journal of Environmental Education, 24(4), 9-14.
  • Lane, J., Wilke, R., Champeau, R., & Sivek, D. (1995). Strengths and weaknesses of teacher environmental education preparation in Wisconsin. The Journal of Environmental Education, 27(1), 36-45.
  • Lieberman, G., & Hoody, L. (1998). Closing the achievement gap: Using the environment as an integrating context for learning. San Diego, CA: State Education and Environment Roundtable.
  • May, T. (2000). Elements of success in environmental education through practitioner eyes. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(4), 4-11.
  • McKeown-Ice, R. (2000). Environmental education in the United States: A survey of preservice teacher preparation programs. The Journal of Environmental Education, 32(1), 4-15.
  • McWayne, E., & Ellis, E. (2003). 2001-2002 Washington state environmental education needs assessment survey. Seattle, WA: Northwest Environmental Education Council.
  • Monroe, M., Scollo, G., & Bowers, A. (2002). Assessing teachers' needs for environmental education services. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 1, 37-43.
  • National Environmental Education and Training Foundation. (2002). A new opportunity for environment-based education. Washington, DC: Author.
  • North American Association for Environmental Education. (2000). Guidelines for the preparation and professional development of environmental educators. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Powers, A. (2004). An evaluation of four place-based education programs. The Journal of Environmental Education, 35(4) 17-32.
  • Shavelson, R. (1996). Statistical reasoning for the behavioral sciences. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Shuman, D., & Ham, S. (1997). Toward a theory of commitment to environmental education teaching. The Journal of Environmental Education, 28(2), 25-32.
  • Simmons, D. (1989). More infusion confusion: A look at environmental education curriculum materials. The Journal of Environmental Education, 19(2), 35-42.
  • Simmons, D. (1993). Facilitating teachers' use of natural areas: Perceptions of environmental education opportuties. The Journal of Environmental Education, 24(3) 8-16.
  • State Education and Environment Roundtable. (2000). California student assessment project: The effects of envirment-based education on student achievement. San Diego, CA: Author.
  • University of Maryland Survey Research Center. (2000). Environmental studies in the K-12 classroom: A teacher's view. College Park, MD: Author.
  • Wade, K. (1996). EE teacher in-service education: The need for new perspectives. The Journal of Environmental Education, 27(2), 11-17.
  • Wade, R., & Eland, W. (1995, Fall). Connections, rewards, and challenges. National Society for Experiential Education Quarterly, 21(1), 4-5, 26-27.
  • Winther, A. (2005). Research related to staff development. In B. Simmons (Ed.), Preparing effective environmental educators (pp. 59-72). Washington, DC: North American Association for Environmental Education.
  • Winther, A., Volk, T., & Shrock, S. (2002). Teacher decision making in the 1st year of implementing an issues-based environmental education program: A qualitative study. The Journal of Environmental Education, 33(3), 27-33.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.