An Exploratory Study of Elementary Preservice Teachers' Understanding of Ecology Using Concept Maps

References

• Artiles, A. J., Mostert, M. P., & Tankersley, M. (1994). Assessing the link between teacher cognitions, teacher behaviors, and pupil responses to lessons. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10, 465-481.
   Google Scholar
• Ausubel, D., Novak, J., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Biodiversity Project. (1998). Engaging the public on biodiversity: A road map for education and communication strategies. Madison, WI: Biodiversity Project.
   Google Scholar
• Brody, M. J. (1996). An assessment of 4th, 8th, and 11th grade students' environmental science knowledge related to Oregon's marine resources. Journal of Environmental Education, 27(3) 21-27.
   Google Scholar
• Buethe, C., & Smallwood, J. (1987). Teachers' environmental literacy: check and recheck, 1975 and 1985. Journal of Environmental Education, 18(3), 39-42.
   Google Scholar
• Derbentseva, N., Safayeni, F., & Cañas, A. J. (2004). Experiments on the effect of map structure and concept quantification during concept map construction. In A. J. Cañas, J. D. Novak, & F. M. González (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping: Vol. 1. Concept Maps: Theory, methodology, technology (pp. 125-134). Pamplona, Spain: Universidad Pública de Navarra.
   Google Scholar
• Disinger, J., & Roth, C. (1992). Environmental literacy. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education Digest.
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Education and Training Partnership Resource Library. (2002, December). Ecology and environmental education: key principles. Environmental Education and Training Partnership. Retrieved August 25, 2005, from http://eelink.net/eetap/info107.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fulp, S. L. (2002). 2000 national survey of science and mathematics education: Status of elementary school science teaching. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
   Google Scholar
• Gayford, C. G. (1998). The perspectives of science teachers in relation to current thinking about environmental education. Research in Science and Technological Education, 16(2), 101-112.
   Google Scholar
• Gerchak, J., Besterfield-Sacre, M., Shuman, L., & Wolfe, H. (2003). Using concept maps for evaluating program objectives. Proceedings from ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. T3B20-25. Retrieved November 4, 2005, from http://fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie2003/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Hug, J. W. (2005, April). Prospective elementary teachers' understandings of ecological concepts, experiential learning and place-based education. In Proceedings of the American Educational Research Association. Retrieved November 4, 2005, from http://www.bath.ac.uk/cree/eeesig/2005.htm
   Google Scholar
• Hungerford, H., & Volk, T. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8-21.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. E., O'Connor, D. L., Pirnay-Dummer, P., Ifenthaler, D., Spector, J. M., & Seel, N. (2006). Comparative study of mental model research methods: Relationships among ACSMM, SMD, MITOCAR & DEEP methodologies. In A. J. Cañas & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Concept Mapping (pp. 87-94). San Jose, Costa Rica: Universidad de Costa Rica.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, A. R., & Kaplan, S. (1997). Toward a methodology for the measurement of knowledge structures of ordinary people: The conceptual content cognitive map (3CM). Environment and Behavior, 29, 579-617.
   Google Scholar
• Khalid, T. (2003). Pre-service high school teachers' perceptions of three environmental phenomena. Environmental Education Research, 9(1), 35-50.
   Google Scholar
• Kinchin, I. (2000). Using concept maps to reveal understanding: A two-tier analysis. School Science Review, 81(296), 41-46.
   Google Scholar
• Kinchin, I. (2001). If concept mapping is so helpful to learning biology, why aren't we all doing it? International Journal of Science Education, 23, 1257-1269.
   Google Scholar
• Klemow, K. M. (1991). Basic ecological literacy: A first cut. Ecological Society of America Education Section Newsletter, 2. Retrieved August 25, 2005, from http://wilkes-fsl.wilkes.edu/~kklemow/basic-lit.html
   Google Scholar
• Landers, P., Naylon, M., Drewes, A. (2002). Environmental literacy scope and sequence: providing a systems approach to environmental education in Minnesota. St. Paul: Minnesota Office of Environmental Assistance.
   Google Scholar
• Leake, D., Maguitman, A., & Reichherzer, T. (2004). Understanding knowledge models: Modeling assessment of concept importance in concept maps. In R. Alterman & D. Kirsch (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 785-790). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McClure, J., Sonak, B., & Suen, H. (1999). Concept map assessment of classroom learning: Reliability, validity, and logistical practicality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 475-492.
   Google Scholar
• Minnesota Department of Education. (2005). Minnesota Academic Standards for Science. Retrieved August 25, 2005, from http://education.state.mn.us/mde/Academic_Excellence/Academic_Standards/Standards_in_Science/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Minnesota Office of Revisor of Statutes. (2005). Environmental education goals and plan, 15A.073. Retrieved November 6, 2005, from http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/115A/073.html
   Google Scholar
• Moseley, C., Reinke, K., & Bookout, V. (2003). The effect of teaching outdoor environmental education on elementary pre-service teachers' self efficacy. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 15(1), 1-14.
   Google Scholar
• Mosothwane, M. (2002). Pre-service teachers' conceptions of environmental education. Research in Education, 68, 26-40.
   Google Scholar
• Munson, B. H. (1994). Ecological misconceptions. The Journal of Environmental Education, 25(4), 30-34.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences. (2005). National Science Education Standards. Retrieved August 25, 2005, from http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/nses/6d.html
   Google Scholar
• North American Association for Environmental Education. (2000). Guidelines for the initial preparation of environmental educators. Rock Spring, GA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, H., Mintzes, J., & Laws, R. A. (2003-04). Successive concept mapping: Assessing understanding in college science classes. Journal of College Science Teaching, 33(3), 12-17.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, D. C., Ryan, J. M., & Samson, S. M. (1998). Using concept maps to assess student learning in the science classroom: must different methods compete? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 1103-1127.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Schultz, S. E., Li, M., & Shavelson, R. J. (2001). Comparison of the reliability and validity of scores from two concept-mapping techniques. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 260-278.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 569-600.
   Google Scholar
• Rye, J. A., & Rubba, P. A. (2002). Scoring concept maps: an expert map-based scheme weighted for relationships. School Science and Mathematics, 102(1), 33-44.
   Google Scholar
• Safayeni, F., Derbentseva, N., & Cañas, A. (2005). A theoretical note on concepts and the need for cyclic concept maps. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 741-766.
   Google Scholar
• Stice, C. F., & Alvarez, M. C. (1987). Hierarchical concept mapping in the early grades. Childhood Education, 64(2), 86-96.
   Google Scholar
• Summers, M., Kruger, C., Childs, A., & Mant, J. (2001). Understanding the science of environmental issues: Development of a subject knowledge guide for primary teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 23(1), 33-53.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO-UNEP. (1976). The Belgrade Charter. Connect: UNESCO-UNEP Environmental Education Newsletter, 1(1), 1-2.
   Google Scholar
• Van Zele, E., Lenearts, J., & Wieme, W. (2004). Improving the usefulness of concept maps as a research tool for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 1043-1064.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, J. D. & Mintzes, J. L. (1990). The concept map as a research tool: Exploring conceptual change in biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 1003-1052.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. G. (1998). Using concept maps to assess conceptual knowledge of function. Journal of Research in Mathematical Education, 29, 414-421.
   Google Scholar
• Winitzky, N., Kauchak, D., & Kelly, M. (1994). Measuring teachers' structural knowledge. Teaching & Teacher Education, 10(2), 125-139.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, Y., Vanides, J., Ruiz-Primo, M., Ayala, C., & Shavelson, R. (2005). Comparison of two concept-mapping techniques: Implications for scoring, interpretation, and use. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 166-184.
   Google Scholar