The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: From Marginality to Worldwide Use

References

• Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality and behavior. Chicago: Dorsey Press.
   Google Scholar
• Albrecht, D., Bultena, G., Hoiberg, E., & Nowak, P. (1982). The New Environmental Paradigm Scale. The Journal of Environmental Education, 13(3), 39-43.
   Google Scholar
• Bechtel, R. B., Corral-Verdugo, V., Asai, M., & Riesle, A. G. (2006). A cross-cultural study of environmental belief structures in USA, Japan, Mexico, and Peru. International Journal of Psychology, 41, 145-151.
   Google Scholar
• Bechtel, R. B., Corral-Verdugo, V., & Pinheiro, J. D. (1999). Environmental beliefs systems: United States, Brazil, and Mexico. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 122-128.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L. R. (1981). Building a sustainable society. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, P. J., & Scott, K. (2006). Environmental concern and behavior in an Australian sample within an ecocentric-anthropocentric framework. Australian Journal of Psychology, 58, 57-67.
   Google Scholar
• Catton, W. R., Jr., & Dunlap, R. E. (1980). A new ecological paradigm for post-exuberant sociology. American Behavioral Scientist, 24, 15-47.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, D. P. (2008). Oriental disadvantage versus occidental exuberance: Appraising environmental concern in India. International Sociology, 23, 5-33.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, S. S., & Poon, C. S. (2001). A comparison of waste-reduction practices and new environmental paradigm of rural and urban Chinese citizens. Journal of Environmental Management, 62, 3-19.
   Google Scholar
• Continental Group. (1982). Toward responsible growth: Economic and environmental concern in the balance. Stamford, CT: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, P., Poe, G. L., & Bateman, I. J. (2004). The structure of motivation for contingent values: A case study of lake water quality improvement. Ecological Economics, 50, 69-82.
   Google Scholar
• Corral-Verdugo, V., Bechtel, R. B., and Fraijo-Sing, B. (2003). Environmental beliefs and water conservation: An empirical study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 247-257.
   Google Scholar
• Cotgrove, S. (1982). Catastrophe or cornucopia. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• de Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior. Environment and Behavior, 40, 330-354.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total-design method. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E. (1975). The impact of political orientation on environmental attitudes and actions. Environment and Behavior, 7, 428-454.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E. (1991). Public opinion in the 1980s: Clear consensus, ambiguous commitment. Environment, 33, 10-15, 32-37.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., & Catton, W. R., Jr. (1994). Struggling with human exemptionalism: The rise, decline and revitalization of environmental sociology. American Sociologist, 25, 5-30.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., & Dillman, D. A. (1976). Decline in public support for environmental protection: Evidence from a 1970-1974 panel study. Rural Sociology, 41, 382-390.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., & Gale, R. P. (1972). Politics and ecology: A political profile of student eco-activists. Youth and Society, 3, 379-397.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., & Gale, R. P. (1974). Party membership and environmental politics: A legislative roll-call analysis. Social Science Quarterly, 55, 670-690.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., Gale, R. P., & Rutherford, B. M. (1973). Concern for environmental rights among college students. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 32, 45-60.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., & McCright, A. M. (2008). A widening gap: Republican and Democratic views on climate change. Environment, 50, 26-35.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., & Olsen, M. E. (1984). Hard-path versus soft-path advocates: A study of energy activists. Policy Studies Journal, 13, 413-428.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The "New Environmental Paradigm": A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. The Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4), 10-19.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere. K. D. (1984). Commitment to the Dominant Social Paradigm and concern for environmental quality. Social Science Quarterly, 65, 1013-1028.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., Catton, W. R., Jr. & Howell, R. E. (1992). Measuring endorsement of an ecological worldview: A revised NEP Scale. Unpublished paper presented at the annual Meeting of the Rural Sociological Society, Pennsylvania State University, August.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425-442.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., & York, R. (2008). The globalization of environmental concern and the limits of the post-materialist explanation: Evidence from four cross-national surveys. Sociological Quarterly, 49, 529-563.
   Google Scholar
• Ebreo, A., Hershey, J., & Vining, J. (1999). Reducing solid waste: Liking recycling to environmentally responsible consumerism. Environment and Behavior, 31, 107-135.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, P. R. & Ehrlich, A. H. (1996). Betrayal of science and reason: How anti-environmental rhetoric threatens our future. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elgin, D. S., & Mitchell, A. (1977). Voluntary simplicity: Life-style of the future? Futurist, 11, 200-206.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G. W., Brauchle, G., Haq, A., Stecker, R., Wong, K., & Shapiro, E. (2007). Young children's environmental attitudes and behaviors. Environment and Behavior, 39, 645-659.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, K. S., McDonald, R., & Louis, W. R. (in press). Theory of planned behavior, identity and intentions to engage in environmental activism. Journal of Environmental Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Geller, J. M., & Lasley, P. (1985). The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: A re-examination. The Journal of Environmental Education, 17(1), 9-12.
   Google Scholar
• Gooch, G. D. (1995). Environmental beliefs and attitudes in Sweden and the Baltic states. Environment and Behavior, 30, 520-534.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C., & Moran, D. (2006). Investigating GM risk perceptions: A survey of anti-GM and environmental campaign group members. Journal of Rural Studies, 22, 29-37.
   Google Scholar
• Hawcroft, L. J., & Milfont, T. L. (2008). The use (and abuse) of the New Environmental Paradigm Scale over the last 30 years: A meta-analysis. Unpublished manuscript, Centre for Applied Cross-Cultural Research, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Heberlein, T. A. (1981). Environmental Attitudes. Zeitschrift fur Umweltpolitik, 2, 241-270.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, H. (1978). Creating alternative futures. New York: Putnam.
   Google Scholar
• Jacques, P., Dunlap, R. E., & Freeman, M. (2008). The organization of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental skepticism. Environmental Politics, 17, 349-385.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, M. K. (1992). Ideological thinking among mass publics and political elites. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 419-441.
   Google Scholar
• Kotchen, M. J., & Reiling, S. D. (2000). Environmental attitudes, motivations, and contingent valuation of nonuse values. Ecological Economics, 32, 93-107.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lalonde, R., & Jackson, E. L. (2002). The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: Has it outlived its usefulness? The Journal of Environmental Education, 33(4), 28-36.
   Google Scholar
• Leopold, A. (1966). A Sand County almanac. New York: Sierra Club/Ballantine Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, C. W., Fryxell, G. E., & Wong, W. W. (2006). Effective regulations with little effect? The antecedents of the perceptions of environmental officials on enforcement effectiveness in China. Environmental Management, 38, 388-410.
   Google Scholar
• Lovins, A. (1977). Soft energy paths: Toward a durable peace. New York: Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Maloney, M. P., Ward, M. P., & Braucht, G. N. (1975). A revised scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. American Psychologist, 20, 787-790.
   Google Scholar
• Manoli, C. C., Johnson, B., & Dunlap, R. E. (2007). Assessing children's environmental worldviews: Modifying and validating the New Ecological Paradigm Scale for use with children. The Journal of Environmental Education, 38(4), 3-13.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W., III. (1972). The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books.
   Google Scholar
• Milbrath, L. W. (1984). Environmentalists: Vanguard for a new society. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milfont, T. L., Hawcroft, L. J., & Fischer, R. (2008). A meta-analysis of the societal variables associated with environmental attitudes. Unpublished manuscript, Centre for Applied Cross-Cultural Research, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Muir, J. 1911. My first summer in the Sierra. New York: Houghton-Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Musser, L. M., & Malkus, A. J. (1994). The children's attitudes toward the environment scale. The Journal of Environmental Education, 25(3), 22-26.
   Google Scholar
• Nooney, J. G., Woodrum, E., Hoban, T. J., & Clifford, W. B. (2003). Environmental worldview and behavior: Consequences of dimensionality in a survey of North Carolinians. Environment and Behavior, 35, 763-783.
   Google Scholar
• Olli, E., Grendstad, G., & Wollebaek, D. (2001). Correlates of environmental behaviors: Bringing back social context. Environment and Behavior, 33, 181-208.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, M. E., Lodwick, D. G., & Dunlap, R. E. (1992). Viewing the world ecologically. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N. (1999). The rejection of continental drift: Theory and method in American earth science. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. C., & Lovrich, N. P., Jr. (1980). Belief systems concerning the environment: The general public, attentive publics, and state legislators. Political Behavior, 2, 259-286.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. C., Lovrich, N. P., Jr., Tsurutani, T., & Abe, T. (1986). Culture, politics and mass publics: Traditional and modern supporters of the New Environmental Paradigm in Japan and the United States. Journal of Politics, 49, 54-79.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. C., Lovrich, N. P., Jr., Tsurutani, T., & Abe, T. (1989). Public knowledge and environmental politics in Japan and the United States. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. C., Steger, M. E., Steel, B. S., & Lovrich, N. P. (1992). Citizens, political communication, and interest groups: Environmental organizations in Canada and the United States. Westport, CT: Prager.
   Google Scholar
• Pirages, D. C., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1974). Ark II: Social responses to environmental imperatives. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, C., & Rauber, P. (2004). Strategic ignorance: Why the Bush Administration is recklessly destroying a century of environmental progress. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rideout, B. E. (2005). The effect of a brief environmental problems module on endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm in college students. The Journal of Environmental Education, 37(1), 3-11.
   Google Scholar
• Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Sanera, M., & Shaw, J. (1996). Facts, not fear: Teaching children about the environment. Washington, DC: Regnery.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. C. (1998). Values and proenviromental behavior: A five-country survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 540-558.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. C. (1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 255-265.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small is beautiful: Economics as if people mattered. London: Blond and Biggs.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, D., & Willits, F. K. (1994). Environmental attitudes and behavior: A Pennsylvania survey. Environment and Behavior, 26, 239-260.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, J., Pelstring, L., & McComas, K. (1999). Using narratives to think about environmental attitude and behavior. Society and Natural Resources, 12, 405-419.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, W. S. (2001). Reliability and factor structure of a Korean version of the New Environmental Paradigm. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 16, 9-18.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, S. (2006). Undermining science: Suppression and distortion in the Bush administration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, C. S. (with DeFries, R. S.). (1990). One earth/one future: Our changing global environment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, J. L. (1981). The ultimate resource. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slimak, M. W., & Dietz, T. (2006). Personal values, beliefs, and ecological risk perception. Risk Analysis, 26, 1689-1705.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanic, J., & Delgado, R. (1996). No mercy: How conservative think tanks and foundations changed America's social agenda. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., Crutzen, P. J., & McNeill, J. R. (2007). The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? Ambio, 36, 614-621.
   Google Scholar
• Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., & Abrahamse, W. (2005). Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 415-425.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 65-84.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1998). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6, 81-97.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). The New Ecological Paradigm in social-psychological context. Environment and Behavior, 27, 723-743.
   Google Scholar
• Stockdale, J. (1989). Pro-growth, limits to growth, and a sustainable development synthesis. Society and Natural Resources, 2, 163-176.
   Google Scholar
• Van Liere, K. D., & Dunlap, R. E. (1981). Environmental concern: Does it make a difference how it's measured? Environment and Behavior, 13, 651-676.
   Google Scholar
• Vikan, A., Camino, C., Biaggio, A., & Nordvik, H. (2007). Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A comparison of two Brazilian samples and one Norwegian sample. Environment and Behavior, 39, 217-228.
   Google Scholar
• Weigel, R. H., & Newman, L. S. (1976). Increasing attitude-behavior correspondence by broadening the scope of behavioral measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 793-802.
   Google Scholar
• Weigel, R. H., & Weigel, J. (1978). Environmental concern: The development of a measure. Environment and Behavior, 10, 3-15.
   Google Scholar
• Zelezny, L. C., & Schultz, P. W. (Eds.). (2000). Promoting environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 365-578.
   Google Scholar