Engaging Pennsylvania Teachers in Watershed Education

References

• Christou, C., Menon, M. E., & Philippou, G. (2004). Teachers' concerns regarding the adoption of a new mathematics curriculum: An application of CBAM. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57, 157-176.
   Google Scholar
• Czerniak, C., & Schriver-Waldon, M. (1991). A study of science teaching efficacy using qualitative and quantitative research methods. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Lake Geneva, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dresner, M. (2002). Teachers in the woods: Monitoring forest biodiversity. The Journal of Environmental Education, 34(1), 26-31.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, J., & E. Hiles. (2005). Selecting computer-based high school curricula: A guide for teachers. Newton, MA: Educational Development Center.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (1999). Change forces: The sequel. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, S., & Oberg, D. (2004). Visions and realities of internet use in schools: Canadian perspectives. British Journal of Education Technology, 35, 569-585.
   Google Scholar
• Gruver, J. B. (2005). Evaluation of DCNR's Watershed Education Program for Educators in Pennsylvania. Unpublished master's thesis, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2001). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, G. E., Wallace, R. C., & Dorset, W. A. (1973). A developmental conceptualization of the adoption process within educational institutions. Austin, TX: Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, University of Texas. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED0951256).
   Google Scholar
• Hani, J., Czerniak, C., & Lumpe, A. (1996). Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 971-993.
   Google Scholar
• Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1-8.
   Google Scholar
• Hord, S. M. (1998). Creating a professional learning community: Cottonwood Creek School. Issues About Change, 6(2), 1-9.
   Google Scholar
• Hungerford, H. R., & Peyton, R. B. (1976). Teaching environmental education. Portland, ME: J. Weston Walch.
   Google Scholar
• Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8-21.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, D. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the Goldilocks Principle. Review of Educational Research, 60, 419-469.
   Google Scholar
• McBride, J. W., Bhatti, M. I., Hannan, M. A., & Feinberg, M. (2004). Using an inquiry approach to teach science to secondary school science teachers. Physics Education, 39, 434-439.
   Google Scholar
• Oravetz, D. (2005). Science and science fiction. Science Scope, 28(6), 20-22.
   Google Scholar
• Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE). (2005). Academic standards: Environment and ecology. Retrieved February 28, 2008, from http://www.pde.state.pa.us/stateboard_ed/cwp/view.asp?Q=76716
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, D. (2002, June). Understanding the role of self-efficacy in teachers' purposes for using the internet with students. Paper presented at the National Educational Computing Conference, San Antonio, Texas. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED475946).
   Google Scholar
• Public Education Network. (2006, May). Open to the public: The public speaks out on No Child Left Behind. A Summary of Nine Hearings: September 2005-January 2006. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, J. M., & Hungerford, H. (1989). The effects of issue investigation and action training on environmental behavior in seventh grade students. The Journal of Environmental Education, 20(4), 29-34.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. A., Hogaboam-Gray, A., & Hannay, L. (2001). Effects of teacher efficacy on computer skills and computer cognitions of Canadian students in grades K-3. Elementary School Journal, 102, 141-158.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, R. E. (1970). Fundamental concepts for environmental management education (K-16). The Journal of Environmental Education, 1(3), 65-74.
   Google Scholar
• Sia, A. P., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1986). Selected predictors of responsible environmental behavior: An analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 17(2), 31-40.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, C., Dowson, M., & Mcinerrney, D. M. (2006). Motivations to teach: Pychometric perspectives across the first semester of teacher education. Teachers College Record, 108, 1132-1154.
   Google Scholar
• Sivek, D. (1989). An analysis of selected predictors of environmental behavior of three conservative organizations. Doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 1988. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49(11), 3322-A.
   Google Scholar
• Stapp, W. B. (1969). The concept of environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 1(1), 30-31.
   Google Scholar
• Swann, C. (2000). A survey of resident nutrient behavior in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Conference proceedings from the National Conference on Tools for Urban Water Resource Management and Protection, Chicago, IL, February 7-10.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 147-164). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. E., Wood, C. A., & Dombeck, M. P. (1997). Understanding watershed-scale restoration. In J. E. Williams, C. A. Wood, & M. P. Dombeck (Eds.), Watershed Restoration: Principles and Practices (pp. 1-13). Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society.
   Google Scholar