Decisions and Dilemmas: Using Writing to Learn Activities to Increase Ecological Literacy

References

• Adeniyi, E. O. (1985). Misconceptions of selected ecological concepts held by some Nigerian students. Journal of Biological Education, 19, 311-346.
   Google Scholar
• Balgopal, M. M. (2007). Examining undergraduate understanding of natural selection and evolution. (Doctoral dissertation, North Dakota State University, 2007) Dissertation Abstracts International, 68(05), 273.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, G. W. (2001). Closing the ecological cycle: The emergence of the integrative cycle. Ecosystem Health, 7(2), 79-84.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). Psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, A. R. (2007). Towards a definition of ecological literacy. Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies. Retrieved May 8, 2007, from http://www.ecostudies.org/people_sci_berkowitz_literacy.html http://www.ecostudies.org/people_sci_berkowitz_literacy.html
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, C. A. (1996). The cultural dimensions of ecological literacy. The Journal of Environmental Education, 27(2), 5-11.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brody, M. (2002). Park visitors' understandings, values and beliefs related to their experience at Midway Geyser Basin, Yellowstone National Park, USA. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 1119-1141.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. (1993). Reforming science education: Social perspectives & personal reflections. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, C. A. (2007). A simple approach to improving student writing. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(6), 48-53.
   Google Scholar
• Case, J. M., & Fraser, D. M. (1999). An investigation into chemical engineering students' understanding of the mole and the use of concrete activities to promote conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 1237-1249.
   Google Scholar
• Cutter-MacKenzie, A., & Smith, R. (2003). Ecological literacy: The ‘missing paradigm’ in environmental education (part one). Environmental Education Research, 9, 497-524.
   Google Scholar
• D'Avanzo, C. (2003). Application of research on learning to college teaching: Ecological examples. Bioscience, 53, 1121-1128.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, J. (2003). Citizenship and sustainability in dependent island communities: The case of the Huon Valley region in southern Tasmania. Local Environment, 8, 527-540.
   Google Scholar
• Ekborg, M. (2005). Student-teachers' learning outcomes during science subject matter courses. International Journal of Science Education, 27(14), 1671-1694.
   Google Scholar
• Futuyma, D. (2007). Science's greatest challenge. Bioscience, 57(1), 3.
   Google Scholar
• Grace, M. M., & Ratcliffe, M. (2002). The science and values young people draw upon to make decisions about biological conservation issues. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 1157-1169.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, B., & Prain, V. (2004). A research program on writing for learning in science, 1992-2002. In C. S. Wallace, B. Hand, & V. Prain (Eds.), Writing and learning in the science classroom (pp. 47-66). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, P. (2002). Environment in the science curriculum: The politics of change in Pan-Canadian science curriculum developmental process. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 1239-1254.
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez-Aleixandre, M.-P. (2002). Knowledge producers or knowledge consumers? Argumentation and decision making about environmental management. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 1171-1190.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., Carter, G., & Rua, M. J. (2000). Exploring the development of conceptual ecologies: Communities of concepts related to convention and heat. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 139-159.
   Google Scholar
• Keys, C. W. (1999). Revitalizing instruction in scientific genres: Connecting knowledge production with writing to learn in science. Science Education, 83, 115-130.
   Google Scholar
• Kinchin, I. M., Hay, D. B., & Adams, A. (2000). How a qualitative approach to concept map anlaysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development. Educational Research, 42(1), 43-57.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, J., Driver, P., Scott, P., & Wood-Robinson, C. (1996). Children's ideas about Ecology 2: Ideas found in children aged 5-16 about the cycling of matter. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 19-34.
   Google Scholar
• Liem, A. (2005). Promoting science literacy by engaging the public. PLoS Biology, 3, e427.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X. (2004). Using concept mapping for assessing and promoting relational conceptual change in science. Science Education, 88, 373-396.
   Google Scholar
• Louv, R. (2006). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L. (1998). Sharing cognition to construct scientific knowledge in school context: The role of oral and written discourse. Instructional Science, 26, 359-389.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, H. H., & Novak, J. D. (2000). Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view. San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Munson, B. H. (1994). Ecological misconceptions. The Journal of Environmental Education, 25(4), 30-34.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D., & Gowin, B. D. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oers, B. V., & Wardekker, W. (1999). On becoming an authentic learner: Semiotic activity in the early grades. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31, 229-249.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, D. W. (1989). Environmental education and ecological literacy. Holistic Education Review, II, 48-53.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, D. W. (1992). Ecological literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raloff, J. (2004a, June 5). Dead waters: Massive oxygen-starved zones are developing along the world's coasts. Science News, 165, 360-362.
   Google Scholar
• Raloff, J. (2004b, June 12). Limiting dead zones: How to curb river pollution and save the Gulf of Mexico. Science News, 165, 378-380.
   Google Scholar
• Rivard, L. P. (2004). Are language based activities in science effective for all students, including low achievers? Science Education, 88, 420-442.
   Google Scholar
• Rivard, L. P., & Straw, S. B. (2000). The effect of talk and writing on learning science: An exploratory study. Science Education, 84, 566-593.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, C. E. (1992). Environmental literacy: Its roots, evolution and direction in the 1990s. Columbus, OH: Clearinghouse for Science Mathematics and Environmental Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED348235)
   Google Scholar
• Saul, E. W. (2004). Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives in theory and practice. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, C. (2004). Better textbooks, better readers and writers. In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction (pp. 370-382). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R.E. (2003) Educational psychology: Theory and practice (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Slingsby, D. (2001). Perceptions of ecology: Bridging the gap between academia and public through education and communication. Bulletin of Ecological Society of America, 82(2), 142-148.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa, D. A. (2001). How the brain learns (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stamp, N. (2005). The problem with the messages of plant-herbivore interactions in ecology textbooks. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 86(1), 27-31.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. K., & Barlow, Z. (2005). Ecological literacy: Education our children for a sustainable world. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
   Google Scholar
• Summers, M., Kruger, C., Childs, A., & Mant, J. (2001). Understanding the science of environmental issues: Development of a subject knowledge guide for primary teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 33-53.
   Google Scholar
• Uno, G. E., & Bybee, R. W. (1994). Understanding the dimensions of biological literacy. Bioscience, 44, 553-557.
   Google Scholar
• van Weelie, D. (2002). Making biodiversity meaningful through environmental education. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 1143-1156.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, C. S., Hand, B., & Yang, E.-M. (2004). The science writing heuristic: Using writing as a tool for learning in the laboratory. In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction (pp. 355-368). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, L., & Law, N. (2001). Explorations in promoting conceptual change in electrical concepts via ontological category shift. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 111-149.
   Google Scholar