944
Views
70
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Closing the Digital Divide: Update From the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study

, &
Pages 52-60 | Published online: 07 Aug 2010

  • Attowell, P. (2000 November). Beyond the digital divide (Working Paper No. 164). New York: Sage.
  • Becker, H. J. (2000). Who's wired and who's not: Children's access to and use of computer technology. The Future of Children: Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 44-75.
  • Brush, T.A., Armstrong, J., Barbrow, D., & Ulintz, L. (1999). Design and delivery of integrated learning systems: Their impact on student achievement and attitudes, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 21, 475-486.
  • CEO Forum. (2001, June). School technology and readiness report. Retrieved June 21, 2002. from http://www.ceoforum.org/downloads/report4.pdf
  • Coley, R., Cradler, J., & Engel, P. (1998). Computers and classrooms: The status of technology in U.S. schools. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  • DeBell, M., & Chapman, C. (2003). Computer and Internet use by children and adolescents in 2001). NCES 2004-014). U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
  • Fairlie, R. (2002). Race and the digital divide. Chicago: Joint Center for Poverty Research.
  • Judge, S., Puckett, K., & Cabuk, B. (2004). Digital equity: New findings from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(4), 383-396.
  • Kleiner, A., & Lewis, L. (2003). Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994-2002 (NCES 2004-011). U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
  • National Institute for Community Innovations. (2003). The five dimensions of digital equity. Retrieved August 29, 2003. from http://digitalequity.edreform.net/
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (National Reading Panel Report No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
  • Norris, C., Sullivan, T, Poirot, J., & Soloway, E. (2003). No access, no use, no impact: Snapshot surveys of educational technology in K-12. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 15-27.
  • O'Bannon, B., & Judge, S. (2004). Implementing partnerships across the curriculum with technology. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(2), 197-216.
  • President's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology. (1997). Report to the President on the use of technology to strengthen K-12 education in the United States. [Online version]. Washington, DC: U.S. Government, Office of Science and Technology Policy. Retrieved June 6, 2002. from http://www.ostp.gov/PCAST/k-12ed.html
  • Puma M., Chapin, D., & Pape, A. (2003). E-rate and the digital divide: A preliminary analysis from the integrated studies of educational technology. Washington DC: The Urban Institute.
  • Ringstaff, C., & Kelley, L. (2002). The learning return on our education technology investment: A review of findings from research. San Francisco: WestEd. Retrieved July 21, 2003. from www.WestEd.org/online_ppubs/learning_return.pdf
  • Schacter, J. (1999). The impact of education technology on student achievement: What the most current research has to say. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Education Technology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED430537)
  • Sivin-Kachala, J., & Bialo, E. R. (1999). 1999 research report on the effectiveness of technology in schools (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Software and Information Industry Association.
  • Smerdon, B., Cronen, S., Lanahan, L., Anderson, J., Iannotti, N., & Angeles J. (2000). Teachers' tools for the 21st century: A report on teachers' use of technology (NCES 2000-102). U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
  • Solomon, G. (2002). Digital equity: It's not just about access anymore. Technology & Learning, 22(9), 18-26.
  • Swain, C., & Pearson, T. (2002). Educators and technology standards: Influencing the digital divide. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(3), 326-336.
  • U.S. Department of Commerce. (2000 October). Falling through the net: Toward digital inclusion. Retrieved June 6, 2002, from http://search.ntia.doc.gov/pdf/fttnoo.pdf
  • U.S. Department of Education. (1999). Student computer use (Office of Educational Research and Improvement, NCES Publication 1999-011). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics (Policy information report. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services. Retrieved June 12, 2002, from http://ftp.ets.org/pub/res/technolog.pdf

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.