- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author.
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
- American Council on Education. (1999). To touch the future: Transforming the way teachers are taught. Washington DC: Author.
- Bernstein, D. J. (1996). A departmental system for balancing the development and evaluation of college teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 20, 241-248.
- Bolick, M. E. (1996). Socialization influences of the elementary environment on a beginning teacher prepared as a constructivist educator: An interpretive case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University, Manhattan.
- Burry-Stock, J. (1993). The expert science teaching educational evaluation model (ESTEEM) Manual. Kalamazoo, MI: Center for Research on Educational Accountability and Teacher Evaluation, Western Michigan University.
- Clinton, B. (1997). President Clinton's call to action for American education in the 21st century. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED468585)
- Cochran-Smith, M. (2006). Policy, practice, and politics in teacher education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
- Cooper, C. K. (1995). Qualitative analysis of preservice elementary teachers' scientific ways of thinking, attitudes, and perceptions during collaborative earth science field-based experiences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University, Manhattan.
- Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Solving the dilemmas of teacher supply, demand, and standards: How we can ensure a competent, caring, and qualified teacher for every child. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
- Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300-314.
- Eisenhower National Clearinghouse for Mathematics and Science Education. (1999). Ideas that work: Mathematics professional development. Columbus, OH: Author
- Goodlad, J. (1994). Educational renewal: Better teachers, better schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Govindarajan, G. (1993). Analysis of preservice elementary school teachers' collaborative problem solving in a constructivist-based interdisciplinary science course. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University, Manhattan.
- Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Holmes Group. (1986). Tomorrow's teachers. East Lansing, MI: Author.
- Holmes Group. (1990). Tomorrow's schools: Principles for design of professional development schools. East Lansing, MI: Author.
- Holmes Group. (1995). Tomorrow's schools of education. East Lansing, MI: Author.
- Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium. (1992). Model standards for beginning teacher licensing and development: A resource for state dialogue. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
- Kansas State Board of Education. (2002). Certification and teacher education regulations and teaching standards for Kansas certification and teacher education. Topeka, KS: Author.
- The Mathematical Association of America. (1991). A call for change: Recommendations for the mathematical preparation of teachers of mathematics. Washington, DC: Author
- Merrian, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (1999). What teachers should know and be able to do. Arlington, VA: Author.
- National Center for Improving Science Education. (1989). Science and technology education for the elementary years: Frameworks for curriculum and instruction. Andover, WA: The Network.
- National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York: Author.
- National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1998). Teaching for high standards: What policymakers need to know and be able to do. New York: Author.
- National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2001). Standards for professional development schools. Washington, DC: Author.
- National Council for the Social Studies. (1998). NCSS standards for social studies teachers. Washington, DC: Author.
- National Council of Teachers of English and International Reading Association. (1996). Standards for the English language arts. Newark, DE: NCTE.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
- National Research Council. (1988). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- National Research Council. (1996). National science standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- National Science Teachers' Association. (1988). Science education initiatives for the 1990s. Washington, DC: Author.
- Ramey-Gassert, L., Shroyer, G., & Staver, J. (1996). A qualitative study of factors influencing science teaching self-efficacy of elementary level teachers. Science Education, 80, 283-315.
- Shroyer, M. G., Ramey-Gassert, L., Hancock, M., Moore, P., & Walker, M. (1995). Math, science, technology after-school clubs and summer magnet school: Collaborative professional development opportunities for science educators. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 6, 112-119.
- Shroyer, M. G., & Wright, E. L. (1995, April). Expertise in preservice elementary teaching in science, mathematics, and technology: Evaluation of an innovative model. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco.
- Shroyer, M. G., & Wright, E. L. (1998, April). A longitudinal case study of organizational change. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. San Diego, CA.
- Shroyer, M. G., Wright, E. L., & Ramey-Gassert, L (1996). An innovative model for collaborative reform in elementary school science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 7, 151-168.
- Stalheim-Smith, A., & Scharmann, L. C. (1994). General biology: Creating a positive learning environment for elementary education majors. The American Biology Teacher, 56, 216-220.
- Teitel, L. (2001). How professional development schools make a difference: A review of research. Washington, DC: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education.
- U.S. Department of Education. (1998). Promising practices: New ways to improve teacher quality. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
- U.S. Department of Education. (1999). Teacher quality: A report on the preparation and qualifications of public school teachers. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
- U.S. Department of Education. (2000). Before it's too late: A report to the nation from The National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Education Publications Center.
- WestEd. (2000). Teachers who learn, kids who achieve: A look at schools with model professional development. San Francisco: Author.
- Willhite, K. T. (1995). Changes in elementary science teachers during their participation in a science, mathematics and technology teacher preparation project. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University, Manhattan.
- Wilson, J. (1996). An evaluation of the field experiences of the innovative model for the preparation of elementary school teachers for science, mathematics, and technology. Journal of Teacher Education, 47(1), 53-59.
- Zollman, D. (1994). Preparing future science teachers. Physics Education, 29, 271-275.
The Journal of Educational Research
Volume 100, 2007 - Issue 4