Development and Validation of the Cognitive Style Indicator

References

• Agor, W. H. (1985). Intuition as a brain skill in management. Public Personnel Management, 14, 15-25.
   Google Scholar
• Allinson, C. W., Chell, E., & Hayes, J. (2000). Intuition and entrepreneurial behavior. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9, 31-43.
   Google Scholar
• Allinson, C. W., & Hayes, J. (1996). The Cognitive Style Index: A measure of intuition-analysis for organizational research. Journal of Management Studies, 33, 119-135.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, S. J. (2000). The influence of cognitive style on performance in management education. Educational Psychology, 20, 323-339.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, S. J., & Priola, V. (2001). Individual differences in cognitive style and their effects on task and social orientations of self-managed work teams. Small Group Research, 32, 283-312.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beyler, J., & Schmeck, R. R. (1992). Assessment of individual differences in preferences for holistic-analytic strategies: Evaluation of some commonly available instruments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 709-719.
   Google Scholar
• Bokoros, M. A., Goldstein, M. B., & Sweeney, M. M. (1992). Common factors in five measures of cognitive style. Current Psychology: Research & Reviews, 11, 99-109.
   Google Scholar
• Bostic, J. Q., & Tallent-Runnels, M. K. (1991). Cognitive styles: A factor analysis of six dimensions with implications for consolidation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, 1299-1306.
   Google Scholar
• Bouckenooghe, D., Cools, E., Vanderheyden, K., & Van den Broeck, H. (2005). In search for the heffalump: An exploration of cognitive style profiles among Flemish entrepreneurs. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 10, 58-75.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, W. W., & Trahant, W. (2000). Business climate shifts: Profiles of change makers. Boston: Butterworth Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait, multi-method matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
   Google Scholar
• Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cascio, W. F. (1995). Whither industrial and organizational psychology in a changing world of work? American Psychologist, 50, 928-939.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, S. (2004). Learning styles: An overview of theories, models, and measures. Educational Psychology, 24, 419-444.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, D. (1996). Cognitive misfit of problem-solving style at work: A facet of person-organization fit. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 194-207.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309-319.
   Google Scholar
• Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review. London: Learning & Skills Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Conner, D. R. (1992). Managing at the speed of change: How resilient managers succeed and prosper where others fail. New York: Villard Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2003). Business research methods (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient α and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-335.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
   Google Scholar
• Desmedt, E., & Valcke, M. (2004). Mapping the learning styles jungle: An overview of the literature based on citation analysis. Educational Psychology, 24, 445-464.
   Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. A., Lanning, K., & Hooker, K. (2002). The MBTI and social information processing: An incremental validity study. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 432-450.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709-724.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 390-405.
   Google Scholar
• Federico, P. A., & Landis, D. B. (1984). Cognitive styles, abilities, and aptitudes: Are they dependent or independent? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 9, 146-161.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, J. K., MacCallum, R. C., & Tait, M. (1986). The application of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: A critical review and analysis. Personnel Psychology, 39, 291-314.
   Google Scholar
• Foxall, G. R. (1986). Managerial orientations of adaptors and innovators. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 1, 24-28.
   Google Scholar
• Foxall, G. R., & Hackett, P. M. W. (1992). The factor structure and construct validity of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 967-976.
   Google Scholar
• Furnham, A. (1995). The relationship of personality and intelligence to cognitive learning style and achievement. In D. H. Saklofske, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 397-413). New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallén, T. (1997). The cognitive style and strategic decisions of managers. Management Decision, 35, 541-551.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, W. L., & Martinko, M. J. (1996). Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator to study managers: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22, 45-83.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbing, D. W., & Hamilton, J. G. (1996). Viability of exploratory factor analysis as a precursor to confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 62-72.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, R. E. (1984). Personality characteristics associated with adaption-innovation. The Journal of Psychology, 117, 2, 159-165.
   Google Scholar
• Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). Thinking styles. In D. H. Saklofske, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 205-229). New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gryskiewicz, N. D., & Tullar, W. L. (1995). The relationship between personality type and creativity style among managers. Journal of Psychological Type, 32, 30-35.
   Google Scholar
• Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. F. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 265-275.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J., & Allinson, C. W. (1994). Cognitive style and its relevance for management practice. British Journal of Management, 5, 53-71.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J., Allinson, C. W., Hudson, R. S., & Keasey, K. (2003). Further reflections on the nature of intuition-analysis and the construct validity of the Cognitive Style Index. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 269-278.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7, 238-247.
   Google Scholar
• Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21, 967-988.
   Google Scholar
• Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 104-121.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson, G. P. (2003). The interface of cognitive and industrial, work and organizational psychology. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 1-25.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson, G. P., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2003). Complex or unitary? A critique and empirical reassessment of the Allinson-Hayes Cognitive Style Index. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 243-268.
   Google Scholar
• Hough, J. R., & Ogilvie, D. T. (2005). An empirical test of cognitive style and strategic decision outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 417-448.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, R. G., Krzystofiak, F. J., Meindl, J. R., & Yousry, A. M. (1989). Cognitive style and decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44, 436-453.
   Google Scholar
• Hurley, A. E., Scandura, T. A., Schriesheim, C. A., Brannick, M. T., Seers, A., Vandenberg, R. J., et al. (1997). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Guidelines, issues, and alternatives. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 667-683.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, S. G., & Puccio, G. J. (1988). Adaption-innovation and the Torrance test of creative thinking: The level-style issue revisited. Psychological Reports, 63, 659-670.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, C. M. (1993). Cognitive styles of creativity: Relations of scores on the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator among managers in the USA. Psychological Reports, 72, 1131-1138.
   Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski, P., & Searle, R. H. (2004). Harnessing diversity and collective action in the top management team. Long Range Planning, 37, 399-419.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151.
   Google Scholar
• Kemler-Nelson, D. G. (1984). The effect of intention on what concepts are acquired. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 734-759.
   Google Scholar
• Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. O., & Mueller, C. W. (1978). Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622-629.
   Google Scholar
• Kirton, M. J. (1994). A theory of cognitive styles. In M. J. Kirton (Ed.), Adaptors and innovators: Styles of creativity and problem solving (pp. 1-33). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kirton, M. J. (2003). Adaption-innovation in the context of diversity and change. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kirton, M. J., & de Ciantis, S. M. (1986). Cognitive style and personality: The Kirton Adaption-Innovation and Cattell's Sixteen Personality Factor Inventories. Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 141-146.
   Google Scholar
• Kirton, M. J., & de Ciantis, S. M. (1994). Cognitive style in organizational climate. In M. J. Kirton (Ed.), Adaptors and innovators: styles of creativity and problem solving (pp. 72-90). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurements, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1-49.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, N. H., Scholl, R. W., & Kowalski, K. B. (1999). Information processing style and decision making. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 407-420.
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. In S. T. Fiske, D. L. Schacter, & C. Zahn-Waxler (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (pp. 201-226). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indixes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410.
   Google Scholar
• Medsker, G. L., Williams, L. J., & Holohan, P. J. (1994). A review of current practices for evaluating causal models in organizational behavior and human resources management research. Journal of Management, 20, 439-464.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promises in educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 19, 59-74.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. (1987). Cognitive styles: An integrated model. Educational Psychology, 7, 251-268.
   Google Scholar
• Most, R. B., & Zeidner, M. (1995). Constructing personality and intelligence instruments: Methods and instruments. In D. H. Saklofse, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 475-503). New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudd, S. (1996). Kirton's A-I theory: evidence bearing on the style/level and factor composition issues. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 241-254.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, I. B., McCaulley, M. H., Quenk, N. L., & Hammer, A. L. (2003). MBTI manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, P. B., & Myers, K. D. (1998). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (European English ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R., Perkins, D., & Smith, E. (1985). The teaching of thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1998). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Pacini, R, & Epstein, S. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 972-987.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, M. G., West, M. A., Shackleton, V. J., Dawson, J. F., Lawthon, R., Maitlis, S., et al. (2005). Validating the organizational climate measure: Links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 379-408.
   Google Scholar
• Power, S. J., Kummerow, J. M., & Lundsten, L. L. (1999). A Herrmann Brain Dominance profile analysis of the sixteen MBTI types in a sample of MBA students. Journal of Psychological Type, 49, 27-36.
   Google Scholar
• Price, J. L. (1997). Handbook of organizational measurement. International Journal of Manpower, 18, 305-558.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, S., & Riding, R. J. (1997). Towards a categorization of cognitive styles and learning styles. Educational Psychology, 17, 5-27.
   Google Scholar
• Riding, R. J. (1997). On the nature of cognitive style. Educational Psychology, 17, 29-49.
   Google Scholar
• Riding, R. J. (2000a). Cognitive style: A review. In R. J. Riding, & S. G. Rayner (Eds.), International perspectives on individual differences. Vol. 1: Cognitive styles (pp. 315-344). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Riding, R. J. (2000b). Cognitive style: A strategic approach for advancement. In R. J. Riding, & S. G. Rayner (Eds.), International perspectives on individual differences. Vol. 1: Cognitive styles (pp. 365-377). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Riding, R., & Agrell, T. (1997). The effect of cognitive style and cognitive skills on school subject performance. Educational Studies, 23, 311-323.
   Google Scholar
• Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles: An overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11, 193-215.
   Google Scholar
• Riding, R., & Pearson, F. (1994). The relationship between cognitive style and intelligence. Educational Psychology, 14, 413-425.
   Google Scholar
• Riding, R., & Rayner, S. (1998). Cognitive styles and learning strategies: Understanding style differences in learning and behaviour. London: Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Riding, R. J., & Wigley, S. (1997). The relationship between cognitive style and personality in further education students. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 379-389.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1991). Criteria for scale selection and evaluation. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 1-16). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler-Smith, E. (1998). Cognitive style: Some human resource implications for managers. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9, 185-202.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler-Smith, E. (2004). Cognitive style and the management of small and medium-sized enterprises. Organization Studies, 25, 155-181.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler-Smith, E., & Badger, B. (1998). Cognitive style, learning and innovation. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10, 247-265.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, D. P. (1980). Construct validity in organizational behavior. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.). Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 3-43). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shipman, K. S., & Shipman, V. C. (1985). Cognitive styles: Some conceptual, methodological and applied issues. In E. E. Gordon (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 12, pp. 199-210). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Spicer, D. (2004). The impact of approaches to learning and cognition on academic performance in business and management. Working Paper Series, Bradford University School of Management, February 2004, Working Paper No 04/03.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1997). Are cognitive styles still in style? American Psychologist, 52, 700-712.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, W. G. K. (1989). The Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory: Should the subscales be orthogonal? Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 921-929.
   Google Scholar
• Tiedemann, J. (1989). Measures of cognitive styles: A critical review. Educational Psychologist, 24, 261-275.
   Google Scholar
• Tinajero, C., & Paramo, M. F. (1998). Field dependence-independence cognitive style and academic achievement: A review of research and theory. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 13, 227-253.
   Google Scholar
• Tullett, A. D. (1997). Cognitive style: Not culture's consequence. European Psychologist, 2, 258-267.
   Google Scholar
• Tullett, A. D., & Davies, G. B. (1997). Cognitive style and affect: A comparison of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation and Schutz's Fundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientation-Behaviour Inventories (KAI and FIRO-B). Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 479-485.
   Google Scholar
• Volkema, R. J., & Gorman, R. H. (1998). The influence of cognitive-based group composition on decision-making process and outcome. Journal of Management Studies, 35, 105-121.
   Google Scholar
• Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47, 1-64.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, S. A., & Hampson, S. E. (2005). Measuring the big five with single items using a bipolar response scale. European Journal of Personality, 19, 373-390.
   Google Scholar
• Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1982). Factors influencing four rules for determining the numbers of components to retain. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 17, 253-269.
   Google Scholar
• Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432-442.
   Google Scholar