The Dynamic Change of Self-Efficacy in Information Searching on the Internet: Influence of Valence of Experience and Prior Self-Efficacy

References

• Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly, 16, 227-247.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. H. (1965). Averaging versus adding as a stimulus-combination rule in impression information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 1-9.
   Google Scholar
• Aronson, E. (1969). Some antecedents of interpersonal attraction. In W. J. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 143-173). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aronson, E., & Linder, D. (1965). Gain and loss of esteem as determinants of interpersonal attractiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 151-171.
   Google Scholar
• Averill, J. R. (1980). On the paucity of positive emotions. In K. Blankstein, P. Pliner, & J. Polivy (Eds.), Advances in the study of communication and affect: Assessment and modification of emotional behavior (Vol. 6, pp. 7-45). New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175-1184.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 87-99.
   Google Scholar
• Barbeite, F. G., & Weiss, E. M. (2004). Computer self-efficacy and anxiety scales for an Internet sample: Testing measurement equivalence of existing measures and development of new scales. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 1-15.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C. (2007). Health-care product advertising: The influences of message framing and perceived product characteristics. Psychology and Marketing, 24, 143-170.
   Google Scholar
• Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995a). Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Information System Research, 6, 118-143.
   Google Scholar
• Compeau, R. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995b). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19, 189-211.
   Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K. W., & McCusker, C. (1997). Gain-loss frames and cooperation in two-person social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1093-1106.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, A. L., & Schertzer, S. M. B. (2005). Bouncing back: How salesperson optimism and self-efficacy influence attributions and behaviors following failure. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 25, 361-370.
   Google Scholar
• Eiser, A. H., Fazio, R. H., Stafford, T., & Prescott, T. J. (2003). Connectionist stimulation of attitude learning: Asymmetries in the acquisition of positive and negative evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1221-1235.
   Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, P., & Smith, C. A. (1988). Shades of joy: Patterns of appraisal differentiating pleasing emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 2, 301-331.
   Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H., Eiser, J. R., & Shook, N. J. (2004). Attitude formation through exploration: Valence asymmetries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 293-311.
   Google Scholar
• Fosterling, F. (2001). Attribution: An introduction to theories, research and applications. Oxford, England: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, B. (2003). The influence of specific computer experiences on computer self-efficacy beliefs. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 443-450.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, T., & Smith, N. D. (1987). Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 307-313.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. T., & Chen, C. C. (2005). The effect of audit outcomes on evaluators' perceptions. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20, 5-18.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, F.Y., & Chu, T.H. (2001, June). A study of web searching behaviors: Comparing the effort-accuracy tradeoff model with the social cognitive theory. Paper presented at the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Seoul, South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luszczynska, A., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). The general self-efficacy scal0e: Multicultural validation studies. The Journal of Psychology, 139, 439-457.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, R. J. (1975). Changing brand attributes through modification of cognitive structure. Journal of Consumer Research, 1, 49-59.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, S. T. (1985). Computer aversion. Computers in Human Behavior, 1, 171-179.
   Google Scholar
• Mizerski, R. W. (1982). An attribution explanation of the disproportionate influence of unfavorable information. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 301-310.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., & Miller, M. D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 193-203.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. A., & Merino, M. C. (2003). Consumer information search behavior and the Internet. Psychology and Marketing, 20, 99-121.
   Google Scholar
• Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296-320.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and achievement behaviors. Educational Psychology Review, 81, 173-208.
   Google Scholar
• Shiv, B., Edell, J. A., & Payne, J. W. (1997). Factors affecting the impact of negatively and positively framed ad messages. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 285-294.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, W. S., Mitchell, T. R., & Gist, M. E. (1995). Responses to successful and unsuccessful performance: The moderating effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between performance and attributions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 286-299.
   Google Scholar
• Thatcher, J. B., & Perrewe, L. P. (2002). An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. MIS Quarterly, 26, 381-397.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039-1062.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (1985). Attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, T., Clarke, V., & Borland, R. (2001). Effects of message framing on breast-cancer-related beliefs and behaviors: The role of mediating factors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 925-950.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. K., Wallston, K. A., & King, J. E. (1990). Effects of contract framing, motivation to quit, and self-efficacy on smoking reduction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 531-547.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 407-415.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, P. (1974). The harassed decision maker: Time pressures, distractions, and the use of evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 555-561.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, W.H., Wan, J.S., & Kao, B. (2001). The study of computer trainer based goal commitment of cognitive and behavior. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Management (pp. 18-19). Taipei: National Taiwan University.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, Z., & Boyd, M. P. (2000). Behavioral and cognitive correlates of exercise self-schemata. The Journal of Psychology, 134, 269-282.
   Google Scholar
• Zanden, J. W. V., Crandell, T. L., Crandell, T., Crandell, C. H., & Crandell, C. (2002). Human development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59.
   Google Scholar