References
- Bartlett, L. D., Weisenstein, G. R., & Etscheidt, S. (2002). Successful inclusion for educational leaders. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
- Bateman, B., & Linden, M. (1998). Better IEPs (3rd ed.). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
- Bateman, B. D., & Chard, D. (1995). Legal demands and constraints on placement decisions. In J. M. Kauffman (Ed.), Issues in educational placement: Students with emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 294-312). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Champaign, J. F. (1993). Decisions in sequence: How to make placements in the least restrictive environment. EdLaw Briefing Paper, 9 & 10, 1-16.
- Champan, I. (2002). Implement these methodologies in general education multilevel classrooms. The Special Educator, 77(21), 5.
- Clvde K. and Sheila K. v. Puyallup School District, 35 F3d 1396 (9th Cir. 1994).
- Crockett, J. B. (1999). The least restrictive environment and the 1997 amendments and federal regulations. The Journal of Law and Education, 28, 543-564.
- Crockett, J. B., & Kauffman, J. M. (1999). The least restrictive environment: Its origins and interpretations in special education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Doe v. Arlington County School Board, 30 IDELR 362 (E.D. Va. 1999).
- Etscheidt, S., & Bartlett, L. D. (1999). The IDEA Amendments: A four-step approach for determining supplementary aids and services. Exceptional Children, 65, 163-174.
- Gorn, S. (1998). What do I do when … The answer book on Section 504. Horsham, PA: LRP Publications.
- Gorn, S. (1999). What do I do when … The answer book on special education law (3rd ed.). Horsham, PA: LRP Publications.
- Hartmann v. Loudoun County Board of Education, 26 IDELR 167 (4th Cir. 1997).
- Hudson v. Bloomfield Hills School District, 23 IDELR 613 (E.D. Mich. 1995).
- Huefner, D. S. (2000). The risks and opportunities of the IEP requirements under IDEA 97. Journal of Special Education, 33, 194-206.
- Huefner, D. S. (2002). Getting comfortable with special education law: A framework for working with children with disabilities. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
- Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (1990).
- Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Regulations, 34 C.F.R. § 300 et seq. (1990).
- Letter to Anonymous, 30 IDELR 707 (OSEP 1998).
- Letter to Estavan, 25 IDELR 1211 (OSEP 1997).
- Letter to Gilchrist, 29 IDELR 977 (OSEP 1998).
- Letter to Goodling, 18 IDELR 213, (OSERS 1991).
- Letter to Hall, 21 IDELR 58 (OSEP 1998).
- Letter to Lott, 16 IDELR 84 (OSEP 1989).
- Letter to Sutler, 18 IDELR 307 (OSEP 1991).
- Letter to Trahan, 30 IDELR 403 (OSEP 1998).
- Letter to VanWart, 20 IDELR 1217 (OSEP 1993).
- Letter to Verguson, 17 IDELR 471 (OSERS 1991).
- Letter to Williams, 21 IDELR 73 (OSEP 1994).
- Oberti v. Board of Education of the Borough of Clementon School District, 995 F. 2d 1204 (3rd Cir. 1993).
- OSEP Memorandum, 95-9, 21 IDELR 1152 (OSEP 1994).
- Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq. (1973).
- Sharp, K. G., & Pitasky, V. M. (2002). The current legal status of inclusion. Horsham, PA: LRP Publications.
- Turnbull, H. R., & Turnbull, A. P. (2000). Free appropriate public education: The law and children with disabilities (6th ed.). Denver, CO: Love.
- Urban v. Jefferson County School District R-1, 21 IDELR 985 (D. Colo. 1994).
- Yell, M. L. (1998). The law and special education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.