74
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Mathematics Instruction in Secondary Interim, Short- and Long-Term Alternative School Placements

&
Pages 39-47 | Published online: 07 Aug 2010

References

  • Algozzine, B., O'Shea, D. J., Crews, W. B., & Stoddard K. (1987). Analysis of mathematics competence of learning disabled adolescents. Journal of Special Education, 21, 97-107.
  • Armstrong, M., Grosser, R., & Palma, P. (1992). At the crossroads: Expanding community-based care for children and families (The New York State plan for children and families mental health services). New York: New York Office of Mental Health.
  • Aron, L. Y., & Zweig, J. M., (2003). Educational alternatives for vulnerable youth: Student needs, program types, and research directions. Retrieved January 14, 2005, from The Urban Institute Web site: http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=410898
  • Austin, J., Johnson, K. D., & Weitzer, R. (2005, September). Alternatives to the secure detention and confinement of juvenile offenders. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Retrieved May 10, 2006, from Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Web site: http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/208804.pdf
  • Bottge, B. A. (1999). Effects of contextualized math instruction on problem solving of average and below-average achieving students. Journal of Special Education, 33, 81-92.
  • Bottge, B. A. (2001). Reconceptualizing math problem solving for low-achieving students. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 102-112.
  • Bottge, B. A., & Hasselbring, T. S. (1993). A comparison of two approaches for teaching complex, authentic mathematics problems to adolescents in remedial math classes. Exceptional Children, 59, 556-566.
  • Bottge, B. A., Heinrichs, M., Chan, S., & Serlin, R. (2001). Anchoring adolescents' understanding of math concepts in rich problem solving environments. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 299-314.
  • Bottge, B. A., Heinrichs, M., Mehta, Z., & Hung, Y. (2002). Weighing the benefits of anchored math instruction for students with disabilities in general education classes. Journal of Special Education, 35, 186-200.
  • Bottge, B. A., Rueda, E., & Skivington, M. (2006). Situating math instruction in rich problem-solving contexts: Effects on adolescents with challenging behaviors. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
  • Brandt, F. J., & Ellsworth, N. J. (1996). Effects of cooperative learning on the academic achievement and self-esteem of urban adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities, 7, 9-13.
  • Coffey, O. D., & Gemignani, M. G. (1994). Effective practices in juvenile correctional education: A study of the literature and research, 1980-1992. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, The National Office for Social Responsibility.
  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt University. (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19(3), 2-10.
  • Davis, W. E., Brutsaert-Durant, L., & Lee, R. M. (2002). Alternative education programs in Maine: A further investigation of their impact upon serving students considered to be at risk and students with disabilities. Orono: The University of Maine, Institute for the Study of Students at Risk, College of Education and Human Development.
  • Doren, B., Bullis, M., & Benz, M. (1996). Predicting arrest status of adolescents with disabilities in transition. Journal of Special Education, 29, 363-380.
  • Duncan, B. B., Forness, S. R., & Hartsough, C. (1995). Students identified as seriously emotionally disturbed in school-based day treatment: Cognitive, psychiatric, and special education characteristics. Behavioral Disorders, 20, 238-252.
  • Fleischner, J. E., Nuzum, M., & Marzola, E. S. (1987). Devising an instructional program to teach arithmetic problem-solving skills to students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 214-217.
  • Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Mathematical problem-solving profiles of students with mathematics disabilities with and without comorbid reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 563-573.
  • Fulkerson, J. A., Harrison, P. A., & Hedger, S. A. (1998). Alternative schools and area learning centers: 1998 Minnesota student survey. St. Paul: Minnesota Department of Education.
  • Gagnon, J. C. (2006a). Juvenile correctional schools for committed youth: A national study of student characteristics and curriculum policies and practices. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Gagnon, J. C. (2006b). Secondary day treatment and residential schools: A national study of student characteristics and curriculum policies and practices. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Gagnon, J. C., & Leone, P. E. (2006). Day and residential schools for children with emotional and behavioral disorders: Characteristics of educators and students. Education and Treatment of Children, 29, 51-78.
  • Gagnon, J. C., & McLaughlin, M. J. (2004). Curriculum, assessment, and accountability in day treatment and residential schools. Exceptional Children, 70, 263-283.
  • Gagnon, J. C., Wehby, J., Strong, A., & Falk, K. B. (2005). Research-based reading and math interventions for youth with emotional disturbance. In L. M. Bullock, R. A. Gable, & K. J. Melloy (Eds.), Sixth CCBD mini-library series: Making a difference in the lives of children and youth with learning and behavioral problems-Proven practices for prevention/intervention in the school, home, and community. Arlington, VA: Council for Children with Behavioral Disorders.
  • Geary, D. C. (1993). Mathematical disabilities: Cognitive, neuropsychological, and genetic components. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 345-362.
  • Geary, D. C., Hamson, C. O., & Hoard, M. K. (2000). Numerical and arithmetical cognition: A longitudinal study of process and concept deficits in children with learning disability. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 236-263.
  • Glassberg, L. A., Hooper, S. R., & Mattison, R. E. (1999). Prevalence of learning disabilities at enrollment in special education students with behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 25, 9-21.
  • Goldman, S. R., Hasselbring, T. S., & the Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). Achieving meaningful mathematics literacy for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 198-208.
  • Gorney, D., & Yssledyke, J. E. (1993). Students with disabilities use of various options to access alternative schools and area learning centers. Special Services in the Schools, 7, 125-143.
  • Gottfredson, D. C., Gottfredson, G. D., & Skroban, S. (1996). A multi-modal school-based prevention demonstration. Journal of Adolescent Research, 11, 97-115.
  • Greenbaum, P. E., Dedrick, R. F., Friedman, R. M., Kutash, K., Brown, E. C., Lardieri, S. P., et al. (1996). National adolescent and child treatment study (NACTS): Outcomes for children with serious emotional and behavioral disturbance. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 130-146.
  • Huntington, D. J. (1994). Instruction in concrete, semi-concrete, and abstract representation as an aid to the solution of relational problems by adolescents with learning disabilities (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, 1994). Dissertation Abstracts International, 56/02, 512.
  • Hutchinson, N. L. (1993). Effects of cognitive strategy instruction on algebra problem solving of adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16, 34-63.
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act of 2004. Pub. L. No. 108-446.
  • Kauffman, J. M., & Smucker, K. (1995). The legacies of placement: A brief history of placement options and issues with commentary on their evolution. In J. M. Kauffman, J. W. Lloyd, D. P. Hallahan, & T. A. Astuto (Eds.), Issues in educational placement: Students with emotional and behavioral disorders. (pp. 21-44). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Learning Technology Center at Vanderbilt University. (1997). The new adventures of Jasper Woodbury [Videodisc]. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Lehr, C. A., Moreau, R. A., Lange, C. M., & Lanners, E. J. (2004). Alternative schools: Findings from a national survey of the states (Res. Rep. No. 2). Retrieved January 14, 2005, from Alternative Schools Research Project, Institute on Community Integration, University of Minnesota Web site: http://ici.umn.edu/alternativeschools/
  • Leone, P. E., & Meisel, S. (1997). Improving education services for students in detention and confinement facilities. Children's Legal Rights Journal, 71, 2-12.
  • Lesh, R. A., & Kelly, A. (2000). Multitiered teaching experiments. In A. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 197-230). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Maccini, P., & Hughes, C. (2000). The effects of an instructional strategy incorporating concrete representation on the introductory algebra performance of secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 10-21.
  • Maccini, P., & Ruhl, K. (2000). Effects of a graduated instructional sequence on the algebraic subtraction of integers by secondary students with learning disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 23, 465-489.
  • McClure, G., Ferguson, H. B., Boodoosingh, L., Turgay, A., & Stavrakaki, C. (1989). The frequency and severity of psychiatric disorders in special education in psychiatric programs. Behavioral Disorders, 14, 117-126.
  • Montague, M., Bos, C. S., & Doucette, M. (1991). Affective, cognitive, and metacognitive attributes of eight-grade mathematical problem solvers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 6, 145-151.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2005). Overview of principals and standards for school mathematics. Retrieved May 14, 2005, from http://www.nctm.org/standards/principles.htm
  • Newmann, F. M., Secada, W. G., & Wehlage, G. G. (1995). A guide to authentic instruction and assessment: Vision, standards, and scoring. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
  • No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
  • Quinn, M. M., Rutherford, R. B. Jr., & Leone, P. E. (2001). Students with disabilities in correctional facilities. (ERIC EC Digest #E621.)
  • Quinn, M. M., Rutherford, R. B. Jr., Leone, P. E., Osher, D. M., & Poirier, J. M. (2005). Youth with disabilities in juvenile corrections: A national survey. Exceptional Children, 71, 339-345.
  • Raywid, M. (1994). Alternative schools: State of the art. Educational Leadership, 52, 26-31.
  • Reid, R., Gonzalez, J. E., Nordness, P. D., Trout, A., & Epstein, M. H. (2004). A meta-analysis of the academic status of students with emotional/behavioral disturbance. Journal of Special Education, 38, 130-143.
  • Silver, S. E., Duchnowski, A. J., Kutash, K., Friedman, R. M., Eisen, M., Prange, M. E., et al. (1992). A comparison of children with serious emotional disturbances served in residential and school settings. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 1, 43-59.
  • Snyder, H. N., & Sickmund, M. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 national report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
  • Trout, A. T., Nordness, P. O., Pierce, C. D., & Epstein, M. H. (2003). Research on the academic status of children and youth with emotional and behavioral disorders: A review of the literature from 1961-2000. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 198-210.
  • Uchida, D., Cetron, M., & McKenzie, F. (1996). Preparing students for the 21st century. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
  • U.S. Department of Education. (1994a). Goals 2000: Educate America Act, 20 U.S.C. § 5801.
  • U.S. Department of Education. (1994b). Sixteenth annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. Jessup, MD: Education Publications Center.
  • U.S. Department of Education. (1999). Twenty-first annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
  • U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Twenty-fourth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. Jessup, MD: Education Publications Center.
  • U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Twenty-fifth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. Jessup, MD: Education Publications Center.
  • Wagner, M., Kutash, K., Duchnowski, A. J., Epstein, M. H., & Sumi, W. C. (2005). The children and youth we serve: A national picture of the characteristics of students with emotional disturbances receiving special education. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 13, 79-96.
  • Wolford, B. I. (2000). Juvenile justice education: Who is educating the youth? Richmond: Eastern Kentucky University, Training Resource Center.
  • Zabel, R. H., & Nigro, F. A. (2001). The influence of special education experience and gender of juvenile offenders and academic achievement scores in reading, language, and mathematics. Behavioral Disorders, 26, 164-172.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.