Providing Classroom-Based Intervention to At-Risk Students to Support Their Academic Engagement and Interactions With Peers

References

• Battistich, V., Solomon, D., & Delucchi, K. (1993). Interaction processes and student outcomes in cooperative learning groups. Elementary School Journal, 94(1), 19-32.
   Google Scholar
• Bovey, T., & Strain P. (2003). Using classroom activities and routines as opportunities to support peer interaction: What works briefs (Report No. 5). Champaign, IL: Center on the Social and Emotional Foundations for Early Learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED481993)
   Google Scholar
• Brendtro, L. K., & Longhurst, J. E. (2005). The resilient brain. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 14(1), 52-60.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex intervention in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
   Google Scholar
• Brown A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological learning theory and the design of innovative environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning and new environments for education (pp. 289-325). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 393-451). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Campione, J. C., Rutherford, M., Gordon, A., Walker, J., & Brown, A. L. (1994). "Now I'm a real boy." Zones of proximal development for those at risk. In N. C. Jordan & J. Goldsmith-Phillips (Eds.) Learning disabilities: New directions for assessment and intervention (pp. 245-274). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, M. J., & Dover, J. G. (1993). The RISK screening test: Using kindergarten teachers' rating to predict future placement in resource classrooms. Exceptional Children, 59, 468-477.
   Google Scholar
• Corsaro, W. A. (1981). Friendship in the nursery school: School organization in a peer environment. In S. R. Asher & J. M. Gottman (Eds.), The development of children's friendships (pp. 207-241). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, H. K., & Washington, J. A. (1993). Access behaviors of children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 322-337.
   Google Scholar
• DiPerna, J. C., Volpe, R. J., & Ellliott, S. N. (2002). A model of academic enablers and elementary reading/language arts achievement. School Psychology Review, 31, 298-312.
   Google Scholar
• Dunst, C. J. (1993). Implications of risk and opportunity factors for assessment and intervention practices. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 13, 143-153.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 2, 256-273.
   Google Scholar
• Education Data Partnership (2005). Retrieved October 6, 2005, from http://www.ed-data.k12.ca.us/Navigation/fsTwoPanel.asp?bottom=%2Fprofile%2Easp%3Flevel%3D05%26reportNumber%3D16
   Google Scholar
• Gay, G. (1988). Redesigning relevant curricula for diverse learners. Education and Urban Society, 2, 327-340.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, L., Haring, T., & Anderson, J. (1986). Educational Assessment of Social Interaction (EASI). San Francisco: San Francisco State University, Project REACH.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H., & Wickstrom, S. (1986). Peer intervention effects on communicative interaction among handicapped and nonhandicapped preschoolers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 209-214.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, C. R., Horton, B. T., & Utley, C. A. (2002). Academic engagement: Current perspectives in research and practice. School Psychology Review, 31, 328-349.
   Google Scholar
• Heward, W. L. (1996). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education (5th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall/Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, J. J., & Patton, J. R. (2004). Differentiating standards-based education for students with diverse needs. Remedial and Special Education, 25(2), 74-78.
   Google Scholar
• Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) of 2004. Pub. L. No. 108-446. (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, C. D., & Pullen, P. C. (2005). Students with learning disabilities (6th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Mulkerne, S. M. (1992). Emerging at-risk populations: Implications for special education reform. Preventing School Failure, 36(4), 20-24.
   Google Scholar
• Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
   Google Scholar
• Poling, A., & Fuqua, R. W. (1986). Research methods in applied behavior analysis. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putallaz, M., & Gottman, J. M. (1981). An interactional model of children's entry into peer groups. Child Development, 52, 986-994.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, M., McCaul, E., & Barnes, K. (1993). Who becomes an "at-risk" student? The predictive value of a kindergarten screening battery. Exceptional Children, 59, 348-358.
   Google Scholar
• Schuler, A. L., & Perez, L. (1987). The role of social interaction in the development of thinking skills. Focus on Exceptional Children, 19(7), 1-11.
   Google Scholar
• Schumm, J. S., & Vaughn, S. (1997). Are they getting it? How to monitor student understanding in inclusive classrooms. Intervention in School and Clinic, 32, 168-171.
   Google Scholar
• Seifert, T. (2004). Understanding student motivation, Educational Researcher, 46, 137-149.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, D., Watson, M., Battistich, V., Schaps, E., & Delucchi, K. (1992). Creating a caring community: Educational practices that promote children's prosocial development. In F. K. Oser, A. Dick, & J. Patry (Eds.), Effective and responsible teaching: The new synthesis (pp. 383-395). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, K. S., Alder, N., & Gunter, P. L. (2003). The effect of varying rates of opportunities to respond to academic requests on the classroom behavior of students with EBD, Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 239-248.
   Google Scholar
• Tabak, I., & Baumgartner, E. (2004). The teacher as partner: Exploring participant structures, symmetry, and identity work in scaffolding. Cognition and Instruction, 22(4), 393-429.
   Google Scholar
• Tawney, J. W., & Gast, D. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K. (1982). The learning disabled child as an inactive learner: Educational implications. In B. Y. L. Wong (Ed.), Metacognition and learning disabilities: Topics in learning and learning disabilities, 2, 45-52.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. V., & Barber, W. H. (1992). The relationship of locus of control and learned helplessness in special education students. Journal of Special Education, 16(1), 1-12.
   Google Scholar
• Wine, J. D. (1981). From defect to competence models. In J. D. Wine & M. D. Smye (Eds.), Social competence (pp. 3-31). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar