Juvenile Structured Day Programs for Suspended and Expelled Youth: An Evaluation of Process and Impact

References

• Alpert, G., & Dunham, R. (1986). Keeping academically marginal youths in school: A prediction model. Youth and Society, 17, 346-361.
   Google Scholar
• American Teacher (1997). Order in the classroom: Why alternative placements are crucial to giving all our students the chance to learn. American Teacher, 81, 8.
   Google Scholar
• Boss, S. (1998). Learning from the margins. Northwest Education Magazine, 3, 3-11.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, D., Blackwelder, S., Aragon, A. T., Langmeyer, D., & Cobb, C. (1998). Alternative learning programs evaluation: 1997-98. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Department of Public Instruction.
   Google Scholar
• Cantelon, S., & LeBoeuf, D. (1997). Keeping young people in school: Community programs that work. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• Castleberry, S., & Enger, J. M. (1998). Alternative school students' concepts of success. NASSP Bulletin, 82, 105-111.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, S. M. (1999). An assessment of an alternative education program for at-risk delinquent youth. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36, 323-336.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, S. M., Davidson, W. S., & Bynum, T. S. (1995). A meta-analytic assessment of delinquency-related outcomes of alternative education programs. Crime & Delinquency, 41, 219-234.
   Google Scholar
• Dugger, J. M., & Dugger, C.W. (1998). An evaluation of a successful alternative high school. High School Journal, 81, 218-228.
   Google Scholar
• Fix, S. (2000). Alternative schools offer second chance for education. Retrieved June 21, 2002, from http://www.charleston.net/news/education/altern0430.htm
   Google Scholar
• Hadderman, M. (2000). Trends and issues: School choice: Alternative schools. Retrieved May 7, 2007, from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2/content_storage_01/0000000b/80/28/27/ee.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hawes, J., Dillard, L., Brewer, D., Cobb, C., & Neenan, P. (2000). Case studies of best practices: Alternative schools and programs: 1998-99. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Department of Public Instruction.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, L. (1997). Alternative schools boast of their role in education. Retrieved June 25, 2002, from http://www.counseling.org/ctonline/archives/ct1197/alt.htm
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, B. J., & Wetherill, K. S. (1998). HSJ special issue introduction alternative schooling. High School Journal, 81, 177-182.
   Google Scholar
• King, L., Silvey, M., Holliday, R., & Johnston, B. (1998). Reinventing the alternative school: From juvenile detention to academic alternative. High School Journal, 81, 229-243.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, C., Litynsky, M., & D'Lugoff, B. (1982). Day school intervention for truant and delinquent youth. In D. J. Safer (Ed.), School programs for disruptive adolescents (pp. 177-192). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, D. W., & Gold, M. (1981). Alternative schools for disruptive secondary students: Testing a theory of school processes, students' responses and outcome behaviors. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education, United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, J. D., & Steffy, B. E. (1999). An evaluation of success in an alternative learning program: Motivational impact versus completion rate. Educational Review, 51, 207-219.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, J. D., & Utesch, W. E. (1998). An alternative learning program: Effects on student motivation and self-esteem. Journal of Educational Research, 91, 272-278.
   Google Scholar
• North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (1998). Alternative learning programs evaluation: 1997-1998. Raleigh, NC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (1999). Alternative education for suspended and expelled students for 1997-1998. Raleigh, NC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (2001). 2000-2001 Facts and figures. Retrieved June 27, 2002, from http://www.ncpublicschools.org/fbs/FactsFigs00_01.htm
   Google Scholar
• North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (2002). Annual study of suspensions and expulsions: 2000-2001. Retrieved July 29, 2002, from http://www.ncpublicschools.org/SBE_meetings/0203/0203_SS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• North Carolina General Statute §7B-2506(16). (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, J., & Zeigler, S. (1988). Suspension, alternatives to suspension and other approaches to discipline. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Toronto Board of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Paglin, C., & Fager, J. (1997). Alternative schools: Approaches for students at risk. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Sowell, T. (2000). Success of alternative schools ignored. Retrieved June 16, 2002, from http://www.austinreview.com/articles/92.htm
   Google Scholar
• Turpin, R., & Hinton, D. (2000). Academic success of at-risk students in an alternative school setting: An examination of students' academic success out of the mainstream school environment. Unpublished master's thesis, Campbellsville University, Campbellsville, KY. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. RC022409)
   Google Scholar