REACH: A Framework for Differentiating Classroom Instruction

References

• Abell, M., Bauder, D., & Simmons, T. (2005). Access to the general curriculum: A curriculum and instruction perspective for educators. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41, 82-86.
   Google Scholar
• Access to the general curriculum: Questions and answers. (2001). Teaching Exceptional Children, 34, 84-85.
   Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1992). An examination of the etiology of the attitude-behavior relation for goal-directed behaviors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 601-634.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, C. R. (1973). Instructional pace differences and their effect on reading acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 9, 526-554.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, T., Lipowski, M., & Rush, C. (2003). Increasing reading achievement of primary and middle school students through differentiated instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Saint Xavier University, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, A. (2006). Valuing differentiated instruction. Education Digest, 72, 57-59.
   Google Scholar
• Berdine, W. (2003). The president's Commission on Excellence in Special Education: Implications for the special education practitioner. Preventing School Failure, 47(2), 92-95.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, R., & Castagnera, E. (2006). Peer supports and inclusive education. Theory Into Practice, 45, 224-229.
   Google Scholar
• Brimijoin, D., Marquissee, E., & Tomlinson, C. A. (2003). Using data to differentiate instruction. Educational Leadership, 60, 70-73.
   Google Scholar
• Brosvic, G., Dihoff, R., Epstein, M., & Cook, M. (2006). Feedback facilitates the acquisition and retention of numerical fact series by elementary school students with mathematics learning disabilities. Psychological Record, 56, 20-35.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, C., & King, R. (2005). Eleven practical ways to guide teachers toward differentiation (and an evaluation tool). Journal of Staff Development, 26(4), 20-25.
   Google Scholar
• Chard, D., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 386-406.
   Google Scholar
• Council for Exceptional Children. (1987). Standards and guidelines for curriculum excellence in personnel preparation programs in special education. Reston, VA: Author
   Google Scholar
• Dion, E., Morgan, P., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2004). The promise and limitations of reading instruction in the mainstream: The need for a multilevel approach. Exceptionality, 12, 163-173.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, M., & Keller, C. (2005). "I said that?" How to improve your instructional behavior in just 5 minutes per day through data-based self-evaluation. Teaching Exceptional Children, 37, 36-39.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, H. B. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Education of All Handicapped Children Act (EHCA) of 1975, Pub. L. No. 94-142, §2, 89 Stat. 77. (1975).
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, C., Carr, S., & Siegel, W. (2006). Influences of experiences and training on effective teaching practices to meet the needs of diverse learners in schools. Education, 124, 13.
   Google Scholar
• Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M., & Moody, S. (1999). Grouping practices and reading outcomes for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 65, 399-415.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, E. S., & Rock, M. L. (2001). Makes sense strategies: Connecting teaching, learning, and assessment. Tuscaloosa, AL: Masterminds.
   Google Scholar
• Fahey, J. (2000). Who wants to differentiate instruction? We did … Educational Leadership, 58, 70-72.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, K., & Denti, L. (2004). High-access instruction: Practical strategies to increase active learning in diverse classrooms. Focus on Exceptional Children, 36(7), 11.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2001). Access to the core curriculum: Critical ingredients for students. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 148-157.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., Frey, N., & Williams, D. (2003). It takes us all. Principal Leadership, 4(3), 41-44.
   Google Scholar
• Friend, M., & Bursick, W. (1999). Including students with special needs: A practical guide for classroom teachers (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L., Al Otaiba, S., Thompson, A., Yen, L., McMaster, K., et al. (2001). K-pals: Helping kindergartners with reading readiness: Teachers and researchers in partnerships. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33, 78-80.
   Google Scholar
• Gable, R. A., Hester, P. P., Rock, M. L., & Hughes, K. (2007). Another look at teacher use of classroom rules, praise, and ignoring. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Gamoran, A., & Weinstein, M. (1998). Differentiation and opportunity in restructured schools. American Journal of Education, 106, 385-415.
   Google Scholar
• Garderen, D., & Whittaker, C. (2006). Planning differentiated, multicultural instruction for secondary inclusive classrooms. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38, 12-20.
   Google Scholar
• George, P. (2005). A rationale for differentiating instruction in the regular classroom. Theory Into Practice, 44, 185-193.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, G., & Chapman, C. (2002). Differentiated instructional strategies: One size doesn't fit all. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. (2005). Mapping the road to proficiency. Journal of Educational Leadership, 63, 32-38.
   Google Scholar
• Haager, D., & Klingner, J. K. (2005). Differentiating instruction in inclusive classrooms. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Hastings, N., & Schwieso, J. (1995). The effects of seating arrangements on task engagement in primary classrooms. Educational Research, 37, 279-291.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrickson, M., & Gable, R. (1997). Collaborative assessment of students with diverse needs: Equitable, accountable, and effective grading. Preventing School Failure, 41(2), 159-163.
   Google Scholar
• Hertzog, N. (1998). Open-ended activities: Differentiation through learner responses. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 212-227.
   Google Scholar
• Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) of 2004, Pub. L. 108-446, 20 U.S.C. §1400 et. seq. (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Kavale, K., Hirshoren, A., & Forness, S. (1998). Meta-analytic validation of the Dunn-and-Dunn model of learning-style preferences: A critique of what was Dunn. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 75-80.
   Google Scholar
• Kendzierski, D. (1990). Decision making versus decision implementation: An action control approach to exercise adoption and adherence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20(1), 27-45.
   Google Scholar
• Lapkoff, S., & Li, R. (2007). Five trends for schools. Educational Leadership, 64, 8-15.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence-Brown, D. (2004). Differentiated instruction: Inclusive strategies for standards-based learning that benefit the whole class. American Secondary Education, 32, 34-62.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., & Batts, K. (2005). How to implement differentiated instruction? Adjust, adjust, adjust. Journal of Staff Development, 26(4), 26-31.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, D. (2005). Are we there yet? Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 156-158.
   Google Scholar
• Mastropieri, M., & Seruggs, T. (2000). The effectiveness of mnemonic instruction for students with learning and behavior problems: An update and research of synthesis. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 163-173.
   Google Scholar
• McLeskey, J., & Waldron, N. (2000). Inclusive schools in action: Making differences ordinary. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• McTighe, J., & Brown, J. (2005). Differentiated instruction and educational standards: Is détente possible? Theory Into Practice, 44, 234-244.
   Google Scholar
• McTighe, J., & O'Connor, K. (2005). Seven practices for effective learning. Educational Leadership, 63, 10-17.
   Google Scholar
• Munk, D., & Bursuck, W. (2003). Grading students with disabilities. Educational Leadership, 61, 38-43.
   Google Scholar
• Neill, M., Guisbond, L., & Schaeffer, B. (2004). Failing our children. The National Center for Fair and Open Testing. Retrieved November 19, 2007, from http://www.fairtest.org/Failing_Our_Children_Report.html
   Google Scholar
• Noble, T. (2004). Integrating the revised Bloom's taxonomy with multiple intelligences: A planning tool for curriculum differentiation. Teachers College Record, 106, 193-211.
   Google Scholar
• No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, §115, Stat. 1425-2094. (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Nordlund, M. (2003). Differentiated instruction: Meeting the educational needs of all students in your classroom. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.
   Google Scholar
• Odgers, S., Symons, A., & Mitchell, I. (2000). Differentiating the curriculum through the use of problem solving. Research in Science Education, 30, 289-300.
   Google Scholar
• Olenchak, R. (2001). Lessons learned from gifted children about differentiation. Teacher Educator, 36, 185-195.
   Google Scholar
• Orlich, D. C., Harder, R. J., Callahan, R. C., & Gibson, H. W. (2004). Teaching strategies. A guide to better instruction (6th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, C., & DeLucia, J. (2005). Decision making in the process of differentiation. Learning & Leading With Technology, 33, 8-10.
   Google Scholar
• Price, K. M., & Nelson, K. L. (2007). Planning effective instruction: Diversity responsive methods and management (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson.
   Google Scholar
• Quenemoen, R., Lehr, C., Thurlow, M., & Massanari, C. (2001). Students with disabilities in standards-based assessment and accountability systems: Emerging issues, strategies, and recommendations (Report No. H326G000001). Washington, DC: National Center on Educational Outcomes. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED452654)
   Google Scholar
• Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (2006). Questioning skills. InJ. Cooper (Ed.), Classroom teaching skills (8th ed.; pp. 1-398). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Sapon-Shevin, M. (2005). "Afterward" in the critical middle school reader. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schumm, J., & Vaughn, S. (1991). Making adaptations for mainstreamed students: General classroom teachers' perspectives. Remedial and Special Education, 12, 18-27.
   Google Scholar
• Schumm, J., & Vaughn, S. (1995). Meaningful professional development in accommodating students with disabilities: Lessons learned. Remedial and Special Education, 16, 344-353.
   Google Scholar
• Schumm, J., Vaughn, S., & Leavell, A. (1994). Planning pyramid: A framework for planning for diverse student needs during content area instruction. Reading Teacher, 47, 608-615.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R., & Zhang, Z. (2005). Styles of thinking as a basis of differentiated instruction. Theory Into Practice, 44, 245-253.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, K., & Wehby, J. (2001). Exploring the relationship between increased opportunities to respond to academic request and the academic and behavioral outcomes of students with emotional behavior disorders (EBD). Remedial and Special Education, 22, 113-121.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, L. (2001). Searching for the best model for instructing students with learning disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 34(2), 1-15.
   Google Scholar
• Thoureau, H. D. (1949). Walden. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Thurlow, M. (2002). Positive educational results for all students: The promise of standards-based reform. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 195-202.
   Google Scholar
• Thurlow, M. (2005). Educating students with disabilities: Do you pass the test? Principal Leadership, 6(4), 12-15.
   Google Scholar
• Thurlow, M., Moen, R., & Altman, J. (2006). Annual performance reports: 2003-2004 state assessment data. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
   Google Scholar
• Tieso, C. (2001). Curriculum: Broad brushstrokes or paint-by-the-numbers? Teacher Educator, 36, 199-213.
   Google Scholar
• Tieso, C. (2003). Ability grouping is not just tracking anymore. Roper Review, 26, 29-36.
   Google Scholar
• Tieso, C. (2005). The effects of grouping practices and curricular adjustments on achievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29, 60-89.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). Mapping a route toward differentiated instruction. Educational Leadership, 59, 12-16.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A. (2000a). Differentiated instruction: Can it work? Educational Digest, 65(5), 25-31.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A. (2000b). Reconcilable differences: Standards-based teaching and differentiation. Educational Leadership, 58, 6-11.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). Differentiated instruction in the regular classroom: What does it mean? How does it look? Understanding Our Gifted, 14(1), 3-6.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A. (2003). Teaching all students. Educational Leadership, 61, 6-87.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A. (2004) Sharing responsibility for differentiating instruction. Roper Review, 26, 188.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A. (2005a). Traveling the road to differentiation in staff development. National Staff Development Council, 26(4), 8-12.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A. (2005b). Differentiated Instruction. Theory Into Practice, 44, 185-273.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2005). Twenty-sixth annual report to congress on IDEA. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• VanSciver, J. (2005). Motherhood, apple pie, and differentiated instruction. Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 534-535.
   Google Scholar
• Voltz, D., & Fore, C. (2006). Urban special education in the context of standards-based reform. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 329-336.
   Google Scholar
• Voltz, D., Sims, M., Nelson, B., & Bivens, C. (2005). A framework for inclusion in the context of standards-based reform. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35, 14-19.
   Google Scholar
• Warshaw, P. R., Sheppard, B. H., & Hartwick, J. (1982). The intention and self-prediction of goals and behaviors (Working Paper No. 80-18, McGill University). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wormeli, R. (2005). Busting the myths about differentiated instruction. Principal Leadership, 5(7), 28-33.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J. (2005). Intervention ideas that really work. Principal, 85, 13-16.
   Google Scholar