Using Progress-Monitoring Data to Improve Instructional Decision Making

References

• Baker, S. K., & Good, R. H., III. (1995). Curriculum-based measurement of English reading with bilingual Hispanic students: A validation study with second-grade students. School Psychology Review, 24, 561-578.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, T. W., & Lembke, E. S. (2005). Progress monitoring in reading using the CBM maze procedure. Arlington, VA: Division for Learning Disabilities, Council for Exceptional Children.
   Google Scholar
• Christ, T. J., & Vining, O. (2006). Curriculum-based measurement procedures to develop multiple-skill mathematics computation probes: Evaluation of random stimulus-set arrangements. School Psychology Review, 35, 387-400.
   Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
   Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L. (1992). The nature and development of curriculum-based measurement. Preventing School Failure, 36(2), 5-10.
   Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. Journal of Special Education, 37, 184-192.
   Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P. K., & Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49, 36-45.
   Google Scholar
• Espin, C. A., Wallace, T., Lembke, E. S., & Campbell, H. (2004). Preparing secondary students for state standards tests: Monitoring reading with curriculum-based measures. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Council for Exceptional Children, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Etscheidt, S. K. (2006). Progress monitoring: Legal issues and recommendations for IEP teams. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(3), 56-60.
   Google Scholar
• Foegen, A., Espin, C., Allinder, R., & Markell, M. (2001). Translating research into practice: Preservice teachers' beliefs about curriculum-based measurement. Journal of Special Education, 34, 226-236.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2005). Responsiveness-to-intervention: A blueprint for practitioners, policymakers, and parents. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(1), 57-61.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1994). Must instructionally useful performance assessment be based in the curriculum? Exceptional Children, 61, 15-24.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1992). Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress. School Psychology Review, 21, 45-58.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2007). A model for implementing responsiveness to intervention. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(5), 14-20.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Ferguson, C. (1992). Effects of expert system consultation within curriculum-based measurement using a reading maze task. Exceptional Children, 58, 436-451.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Stecker, P. M. (1990). The role of skills analysis in curriculum-based measurement in math. School Psychology Review, 19, 6-22.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22, 27-48.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral-reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239-256.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Maxwell, S. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9(2), 20-28.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Hamlett, C. L., & Fuchs, D. (1997). Monitoring basic skills progress: Basic reading (2nd ed.) [Computer software and manual]. Austin, TX: PRO-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Gable, R. A., Arllen, N. L., Evans, W. H., & Whinnery, K. W. (1997). Strategies for evaluating collaborative mainstream instruction: "Let the data be our guide." Preventing School Failure, 41(4), 153-158.
   Google Scholar
• Gansle, K., Noell, G., VanDerHeyden, A., Naquin, G., & Slider, N. (2002). Moving beyond total words written: The reliability, criterion validity, and time cost of alternative measures for curriculum-based measurement in writing. School Psychology Review, 31, 477-497.
   Google Scholar
• Gansle, K., VanDerHeyden, A., Noell, G., Resetar, J., & Williams, K. (2006). The technical adequacy of curriculum-based and rating-based measures of written expression for elementary school students. School Psychology Review, 35, 435-450.
   Google Scholar
• Good, R. H., III, & Kaminski, R. A. (2003). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (6th ed.). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
   Google Scholar
• Good, R. H., III, Simmons, D. C., & Kame'enui, E. J. (2001). The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third grade high-stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 257-288.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, A. J., VanDerHeyden, A. M., Parson, L. B., & Burns, M. K. (2006). Practical-applications of response-to-intervention research. Assessment for Effective Instruction, 32(1), 50-57.
   Google Scholar
• Hagan-Burke, S., & Jefferson, G. L. (2002). Using data to promote academic benefit for included students with mild disabilities. Preventing School Failure, 46(3), 112-118.
   Google Scholar
• Hosp, M., & Hosp, J. (2003). Curriculum-based measurement for reading, spelling, and math: How to do it and why. Preventing School Failure, 48(1), 10-17.
   Google Scholar
• Hosp, M. K., Hosp, J. L., & Howell, K. W. (2007). The ABCs of CBM: A practical guide to curriculum-based measurement. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. R., Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K. (1979). Measuring pupil progress toward the least restrictive environment. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2, 81-92.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. R., & Jewell, M. (1993). Examining the validity of two measures for formative teaching: Reading aloud and maze. Exceptional Children, 59, 421-432.
   Google Scholar
• Lembke, E. S., & Busch, T. W. (2004). Curriculum-based measurement in reading: Oral fluency. Arlington, VA: Division for Learning Disabilities, Council for Exceptional Children.
   Google Scholar
• McGlinchey, M. T., & Hixson, M. D. (2004). Using curriculum-based measurement to predict performance on state assessments in reading. School Psychology Review, 33, 193-203.
   Google Scholar
• No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001. 20 U.S.C. §6301 et seq. (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, R., & Shapiro, E. (2006). Curriculum-based measurement and the evaluation of reading skills of Spanish-speaking English language learners in bilingual education classrooms. School Psychology Review, 35, 356-369.
   Google Scholar
• Rock, M. L., Thead, B. K., & Gable, R. A. (with Hardman, M. L., & Van Acker, R.). (2006). In pursuit of excellence: The past as prologue to a brighter future for special education. Focus on Exceptional Children, 38(8), 1-18.
   Google Scholar
• Schulte, A. C., Villwock, D. N., Whichard, M., & Stallings, C. F. (2001). High stakes testing and expected progress standards for students with learning disabilities: A five-year study of one district. School Psychology Review, 30, 487-506.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, V. G., & Weishaar, M. (2003). Curriculum-based measurement for reading progress. Intervention in School and Clinic, 38, 153-159.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, J., Deno, S. L., & Espin, C. (2000). Technical adequacy of the maze task for curriculum based measurement of reading growth. Journal of Special Education, 34, 164-172.
   Google Scholar
• Shinn, M. R. (Ed.). (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assesing special children. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shinn, M. R. (Ed.). (1998). Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shinn, M. R., Knutson, N., Collins, V. L., Good, R. H., III, & Tilly, W. D., III. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement of oral-reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading. School Psychology Review, 21, 459-479.
   Google Scholar
• Stage, S. A., & Jacobsen, M. D. (2001). Predicting student success on a state-mandated performance-based assessment using oral-reading fluency. School Psychology Review, 30, 407-419.
   Google Scholar
• Stecker, P. M., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 795-819.
   Google Scholar
• Stecker, P., Saenz, L., & Lemons, C. (2007). Introduction to using curriculum-based measurement for progress monitoring in reading [PowerPoint presentation]. Retrieved November 9, 2007, from http://www.studentprogress.org/summer_institute/default.asp#reading
   Google Scholar
• Yell, M. L., & Stecker, P. M. (2003). Developing legally correct and educationally meaningful IEPs using curriculum-based measurement. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 28(4), 73-88.
   Google Scholar