Behavioral-Progress Monitoring Using the Electronic Daily Behavioral Report Card (e-DBRC) System

References

• Albin, R. W., Lucyshyn, J. M., Horner, R. H., & Flannery, K. B. (1996). Contextual fit for behavior support plans: A model for a goodness of fit. In L. K. Koegel, R. L. Koegel, & G. Dunlap (Eds.), Positive behavior support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community (pp. 81-98). Baltimore: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (Eds.). (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benazzi, L., Horner, R., & Good, R. (2006). Effects of behavior support team composition on the technical adequacy and contextual fit of behavior support plans. Journal of Special Education, 40, 160-170.
   Google Scholar
• Carnine, D. (1995). Trustworthiness, usability, and accessibility of educational research. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 251-258.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, R. A. (1979). Goal-attainment scaling as a useful tool for evaluating progress in special education. Exceptional Children, 46, 88-95.
   Google Scholar
• Chafouleas, S. M., McDougal, J. L., Riley-Tillman, T. C., Panahon, C. J., & Hilt, A. M. (2005). What do Daily Behavior Report Cards (DBRCs) measure? An initial comparison of DBRCs with direct observation for off-task behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 669-676.
   Google Scholar
• Chafouleas, S. M., Riley-Tillman, T. C., & McDougal, J. L. (2002). Good, bad, or in-between: How does the daily behavior report card rate? Psychology in the Schools, 39, 157-169.
   Google Scholar
• Chafouleas, S. M., Riley-Tillman, T. C., & Sassu, K. A. (2006). Acceptability and reported use of daily behavior report cards among teachers. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8, 174-182.
   Google Scholar
• Chafouleas, S, M., Riley-Tillman, T. C., & Sugai, G. (in press). School-based behavioral assessment: Informing instruction and intervention. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Crone, D. A., Horner, R. H., & Hawken, L. S. (2004). Responding to problem behavior in schools: The behavior education program. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, T. L., Martens, B. K., & DiGennaro, F. D. (2005). Increasing the accuracy of functional assessment methods: Describing antecedent-behavior-consequence relations using conditional probabilities. School Psychology Review, 34, 520-528.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbanks, S., Sugai, G., Guardino, D., & Lathrop, M. (2007). Response to intervention: Examining classroom behavior support in second grade. Exceptional Children, 73, 288.
   Google Scholar
• Gresham, F. M. (1999). Noncategorical approaches to K-12 emotional and behavioral difficulties. In D. Reschly, W. D. Tilly, & J. Grimes (Eds.), Special education in transition: Functional assessment and noncategorical programming (pp. 107-138). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
   Google Scholar
• Gresham, F. M. (2004). Current status and future directions of school-based behavioral interventions. School Psychology Review, 33, 326-343.
   Google Scholar
• Gresham, F. M. (2005). Response to intervention: An alternative means of identifying students as emotionally disturbed. Education and Treatment of Children, 28, 328-344.
   Google Scholar
• Gresham, F. M., & Lopez, M. F. (1996). Social validation: A unifying concept for school-based consultation research and practice. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 204-227.
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, P. L., Callicott, K., Denny, K. R., & Gerber, B. L. (2003). Finding a place for data collection in classrooms for students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Preventing School Failure, 48(1), 4-8.
   Google Scholar
• Hawken, L. S. (2002). Evaluation of a targeted group intervention within a schoolwide] system of behavior support. Unpublished dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.
   Google Scholar
• Hintze, J. M. (2005). Psychometrics of direct observation. School Psychology Review, 34, 507-519.
   Google Scholar
• Hintze, J. M., & Matthews, W. J. (2004). The generalizability of systematic direct observations across time and setting: A preliminary investigation of the psychometrics of behavioral observation. School Psychology Review, 33, 258-270.
   Google Scholar
• Hosp, J. L., Howell, K. W., & Hosp, M. K. (2003). Characteristics of behavior rating scales: Implications for practice in assessment and behavior support. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 4, 201-208.
   Google Scholar
• Kiresuk, T. J., & Sherman, R. E. (1968). Goal-attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating community mental health programs. Community Mental Health Journal, 4, 443-453.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., Wehby, J., Menzies, H. M., Doukas, G. L., Munton, S. M., & Gregg, R. M. (2003). Social-skills instruction for students at risk for antisocial behavior: The effects of small-group instruction. Behavioral Disorders, 28, 229-248.
   Google Scholar
• Leff, S. S., & Lakin, R. (2005). Playground-based observational systems: A review and implications for practitioners and researchers. School Psychology Review, 34, 474-488.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, T. J., & Sugai, G. (1999). Effective behavior support: A systems approach to proactive school-wide management. Effective School Practices, 17, 47-53.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, T. J. Sugai, G., & Colvin, G. (1998). Reducing problem behavior through a school-side system of effective behavioral support: Investigation of a school-wide social skills training program and contextual interventions. School Psychology Review, 27, 446-459.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, C. A. (1983). Goal attainment scaling: A method for evaluating special education services. Exceptional Children, 49, 529-536.
   Google Scholar
• March, R. E., & Horner, R. H. (2002). Feasibility and contributions of functional behavioral assessment in schools. Journal of Emotional and Behavior Disorders, 10, 158-170.
   Google Scholar
• Roach, A. T., & Elliott, S. N. (2005). Goal-attainment scaling: An efficient and effective approach to monitoring student progress. Teaching Exceptional Children, 37, 8-17.
   Google Scholar
• Severson, H. H., Walker, H. M., Hope-Doolittle, J., Kratochwill, T. M., & Gresham, F. (2007). Proactive, early screening to detect behaviorally at-risk students: Issues, approaches, emerging innovations, and professional practices. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 193-223.
   Google Scholar
• Steege, M. W., Davin, T., & Hathaway, M. (2001). Reliability and accuracy of a performance-based behavioral recording procedure. School Psychology Review, 30, 252-261.
   Google Scholar
• Sugai, G., Lewis-Palmer, T., & Hagan-Burke, S. (2000). Overview of the functional assessment process. Exceptionality, 8, 149-160.
   Google Scholar
• Vannest, K., Burke, M., & Adiguzel, T. (2006). Electronic Daily Behavior Report Card (e-DBRC): A Web-based system for progress monitoring (beta version) [Web-based application]. College Station: Texas A&M University. Retrieved April 21, 2008, from http://e-dbrc.tamu.edu
   Google Scholar
• Volpe, R. J., DiPerna, J. C., Hintze, J. M., & Shapiro, E. S. (2005). Observing students in classroom settings: A review of seven coding schemes. School Psychology Review, 34, 454-473.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, H. M., & Severson, H. H. (1990). Systematic screening for behavior disorders (SSBD). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, H. M., Severson, H. H., Todis, B. J., Block-Pedego, A. E., Williams, G. J., Haring, N. G., et al. (1990). Systematic screening for behavior disorders (SSBD): Further validation, replication, and normative data. Remedial and Special Education, 11, 32-46.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. S., & Reschly, D. J. (1996). Assessment in school psychology training and practice. School Psychology Review, 25, 9-23.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203-214.
   Google Scholar