"I Like It the Way It Is!": Peer-Revision Writing Strategies for Students With Emotional and Behavioral Disorders

References

• Alber, S., & Heward, W. (1996). Gotcha! Twenty-five behavior traps guaranteed to extend your students' academic and social skills. Intervention in School and Clinic, 31, 285-289.
   Google Scholar
• Bardine, B. A., Bardine, M. S., & Deegen, E. F. (2000). Beyond the red pen: Clarifying our role in the response process. English Journal, September, 93-101.
   Google Scholar
• Benware, L., & Deci, S. (1984). Quality of learning with an active versus passive motivational set. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 755-765.
   Google Scholar
• Berninger, V., & Hooper, S. (1993). Preventing and remediating writing disabilities: Interdisciplinary frameworks for assessment, consultation, and intervention. School Psychology Review, 22, 590-598.
   Google Scholar
• Calkins, L. (1980). Children's rewriting strategies. Research in the Teaching of English, 14, 197-222.
   Google Scholar
• Chalk, J., Hagan-Burke, S., & Burke, M. (2005). The effects of self-regulated strategy development on the writing process for high school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 28, 75-87.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, J. (1998). Strategies for struggling writers. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, K. (2003). Ability profiling and school failure: One child's struggle to be seen as competent. New York: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Culham, R. (2002). Advanced 6+1 traits of writing assessment and instruction. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Library.
   Google Scholar
• De La Paz, S. (2001). Stop and dare: A persuasive writing strategy. Intervention in School and Clinic, 36, 234-243.
   Google Scholar
• De La Paz, S., & Graham, S. (2002). Explicitly teaching strategies, skills, and knowledge: Writing instruction in middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 687-698.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, C., & Sanchez, R. (1994). Giving students control over writing assessment. English Journal, April, 47-53.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, R., Brewer, D., Gamoran, A. & Wilms, J. (2001). Class size and student achievement. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(1), 1-30.
   Google Scholar
• Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., Anderson, L., Anthony, H., Stevens, D., & Fear, K. (1991). Making strategies and self-talk visible: Writing instruction in regular and special education classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 337-372.
   Google Scholar
• Espen, C., Weissenburger, J., & Benson, B. (2004). Assessing the writing performance of students in special education. Exceptionality, 12, 55-66.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J., & Stamm, C. (1990). Effects of group conferences on first graders' revision in writing. Written Communication, 7(1), 96-135.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzsimmons-Hughes, A., & Adera, B. (2006). Education and day treatment opportunities in schools: Strategies that work. Preventing School Failure, 51, 26-30.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. (1997). It can be taught, but does not develop naturally: Myths and realities in writing instruction. School Psychology Review, 26, 414-424. Retrieved September 16, 2007, from Wilson Web database.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. (1999). Assessment and intervention in overcoming writing difficulties: An illustration from the self-regulated writing strategy development model. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 30, 255-264.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. (2006). Writing better. Baltimore: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K., MacArthur, C. & Schwartz, S. (1991). Writing and writing instruction with students with learning disabilities: A review of a program of research. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 89-114.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., MacArthur, C., & Schwartz, S. (1995). Effects of goal setting and procedural facilitation on the revising behavior and writing performance of students with writing and learning problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2). Retrieved October 2, 2007, from EBSCOhost database.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, D. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Hallenbeck, M. (2002). Taking charge: Adolescents and learning disabilities assume responsibility for their own writing. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22(4), 1-17.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K., & Graham, S. (1999). Programmatic intervention research: Illustrations from the evolution of self regulated strategy development. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22(4), 1-17.
   Google Scholar
• James, L., & Abbott, M. (2001). How Adam became a writer. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(3), 30-38.
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. (1982). Single-case research design: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K., Harris, K., Graham, S., Weisenbach, J., Brindle, M., & Morphy, P. (2008). The effects of self-regulated strategy development on the writing performance of second-grade students with behavioral and writing difficulties. Journal of Special Education, 41, 234-253.
   Google Scholar
• Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Education and Policy Analysis, 24(1), 37-62.
   Google Scholar
• Lensmire, T. (1994). When children write: Critical revisions of the writing workshop. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, M. (2002). The myth of laziness. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, D. (1996). Teaching analytical writing: Help for general education middle school teachers. Intervention in School and Clinic, 32(2), 95-103.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A., & Cross, L. (2001, April). Moving from I to us: The power of action research to improve students' writing performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Monroe, B., & Troia, G. (2006). Teaching writing strategies to middle school students with disabilities. The Journal of Educational Research, 100, 21-33.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Excellence in Education (NCEE). (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Retrieved January 3, 2004, from http://www.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Olson-Brakel, V. (1990). The revising process of sixth-grade writers with and without peer feedback. The Journal of Educational Research, 84, 22-29.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, R. (2001). A framework for understanding poverty (2nd ed.). New York: Aha! Process.
   Google Scholar
• Pemberton, J., Rademacher, J., Tyler-Wood, T., & Cereijo, M. (2006). Aligning assessment with state curriculum standards and teaching strategies. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41, 283-289.
   Google Scholar
• Scardmalia, C., & Bereiter, M. (1986). Fostering the development of self-regulation in children's knowledge processing. In S. F. Chipman, J. W. Segel, & R. Glasser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills (Vol. 2, pp. 91-102). New York: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Schrimer, B., & Bailey, J. (2000). Writing assessment rubric. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33, 52-58.
   Google Scholar
• Schumaker, J., & Deshler, D. (2003). Effective instruction for struggling secondary students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26(2), 129-141.
   Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, A. (1994). Teaching to the test: Sometimes a good practice. English Journal, April, 54-58.
   Google Scholar
• Strickland, D., Bodhino, K., Jones, K., Nelson, A., & Rosen, M. (2001). Teaching writing in a time of reform. Elementary School Journal, 101, 385-396.
   Google Scholar
• Troia, G., & Graham, S. (2002). The effectiveness of a highly explicit, teacher directed strategy instruction routine: Changing the writing performance of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 290-305.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2002). No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Act Legislation and Policies Web site. Retrieved October 24, 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/accountability/ayp/testingforresults.html
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2003). 23rd annual report to Congress: Part II. Student Characteristics, 27-40. Retrieved October 25, 2007, from http://www.nydoe.com
   Google Scholar