Conditions of Contact, Common In-Group Identity, and In-Group Bias Toward Contingent Workers

References

• Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, T. E., & Billings, R. S. (1993). Profiles of commitment: An empirical test. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 177-190.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, L. M., Graham J. W., & Flaherty, B. P. (1998). An alternative framework for defining mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 295-312.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. (2002). Full-time versus part-time employees: Understanding the links between work status, the psychological contract, and attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 279-301.
   Google Scholar
• Darden, W. R., McKee, D., & Hampton, R. (1993). Salesperson employment status as a moderator in the job satisfaction model: A frame of reference perspective. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 13, 1-15.
   Google Scholar
• Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Isen, A. M., & Lowrance, R. (1995). Group representations and intergroup bias: Positive affect, similarity, and group size. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 856-865.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, D. C. (1995). Managing part-time and temporary employment relationships: Individual needs and organizational demands. In M. London (Ed.), Employees, careers, and job creation (pp. 121-141). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common in-group identity model. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common in-group identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 2-26.
   Google Scholar
• Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., & Bachman, B. A. (1996). Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The induction of a common ingroup identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 271-290.
   Google Scholar
• Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Mann, J. A., Murrell, A. J., & Pomare, M. (1990). How does cooperation reduce intergroup bias? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 692-704.
   Google Scholar
• Gaertner, S. L., Rust, M., Dovidio, J. F., Bachman, B. A., & Anastasio, P. A. (1994). The contact hypothesis: The role of a common in-group identity on reducing intergroup bias. Small Group Research, 25, 224-249.
   Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hinkle, S., & Brown, R. (1990). Intragroup identification and intergroup differentiation. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 48-70). New York: Harvester/Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121-140.
   Google Scholar
• Houlette, M. A., Gaertner, S. L., Johnson, K. M., Banker, B. S., Riek, B. M., & Dovidio, J. F. (2004). Developing a more inclusive social identity: An elementary School intervention. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 35-55.
   Google Scholar
• Intoxicants Statistical Yearbook. (2001). Helsinki, Finland: STAKES.
   Google Scholar
• Levanoni, E., & Sales, C. A. (1990). Differences in job attitudes between full-time and part-time Canadian employees. The Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 231-237.
   Google Scholar
• Lipponen, J., Helkama, K., & Juslin, M. (2003). Subgroup identification, superordinate identification and intergroup bias between the subgroups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 239-250.
   Google Scholar
• Lipponen, J., Olkkonen, M.-E., & Moilanen, M. (2004). Perceived procedural justice and employee responses to an organizational merger. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13, 391-413.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83-104.
   Google Scholar
• Mael, F. A., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123.
   Google Scholar
• Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: Integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122.
   Google Scholar
• Mummenday, A., & Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158-174.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Baron, J. (1988). Taking the workers back out: Recent trends in the structuring of employment. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 257-303.
   Google Scholar
• Pusila, J. (1995). The shipyards in local labour market. In H. Leimu & J. Pusila (Eds.), A change of production paradigm in Finnish shipbuilding (pp. 30-67; Discussion and Working Papers, 4). Turku, Finland: Turku School of Economics and Business Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, S. P. (1996). Organizational behavior (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and non-experimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Terry, D. J., Carey, C. J., & Callan, V. J. (2001). Employee adjustment to an organizational merger: An intergroup perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 267-280.
   Google Scholar
• Terry, D. J., & O'Brien, A. T. (2001). Status, legitimacy, and in-group bias in the context of an organizational merger. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4, 271-289.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C. (1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 6-34). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J, Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, D., Van Knippenberg, B., Monden, L., & de Lima, F. (2002). Organizational identification after a merger: A social identity approach. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 233-252.
   Google Scholar
• Waldzus, S., Mummenday, A., Wenzel, M., & Boettcher, F. (2004). Of bikers, teachers and Germans: Groups' diverging views about their prototypicality. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 385-400.
   Google Scholar
• Wittig, M. A., & Molina, L. (2000). Moderators and mediators of prejudice reduction in multicultural education. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 295-318). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar