Choice set generation in spatial contexts: a review

REFERENCES

• Aldskogius, H. (1977) A conceptual framework and a Swedish case study of recreational behavior and environmental cognition, Economic Geography, 53, pp.163–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arentze, T.A. and Timmermans, H.J.P. (2000) Albatross (Eindhoven: EIRASS).
   Google Scholar
• Arentze, T.A. and Timmermans, H.J.P. (2004) A learning-based transportation oriented simulation system, Transportation Research Part B, 38, pp. 613–633.
   Google Scholar
• Arentze, T.A. and Timmermans, H.J.P. (2005) Albatross 2.0 (Eindhoven:. EIRASS).
   Google Scholar
• Arentze, T.A. and Timmermans, H.J.P. (2005a) Information gain, novelty seeking and travel: A model of dynamic activity-travel behavior under conditions of uncertainty, Transportation Research A, 39, pp. 125–145.
   Google Scholar
• Arentze, T.A. and Timmermans, H.J.P. (2005b) Representing mental maps and cognitive learning in micro-simulation models of activity-travel choice dynamics, Transportation, 32, pp. 321–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekhor, S., Ben-Akiva, M. E. And Ramming, M.S. (2006) Evaluation of choice set generation algorithms for route choice models, Annals of Operations Research, 144, 235–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva, M., Bergman, M. J., Daly, A. J. and Ramaswamy, R. (1984) Modeling Inter Urban Route Choice Behaviour. In J. Volmuller and R. Hamerslag (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, VNU Press, Utrecht, pp. 299–330.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva, M., Gunn G.H. and Silman, L. (1985) Disaggregate trip distribution models. Paper presented at the Japanese Society of Civil Engineers, Tokyo.
   Google Scholar
• Ben Akiva M. and Lerman, S. (1985) Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva, M. E. and Boccara, B. (1995) Discrete choice models with latent choice sets. International, Journal of Research in Marketing, 12, pp. 9–24.
   Google Scholar
• Black, W. C. (1984) Choice set definition in patronage modeling, Journal of Retailing, 60, pp. 63–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgers, A. W. J. and Timmermans, H. J. P. (1985) Effects of spatial arrangement and similarity on spatial choice behavior. Proceedings of the Fourth European Colloquium on Theoretical and Quantitative Geography, Veldhoven.
   Google Scholar
• Borgers, A.W.J. and Timmermans, H.J.P. (1987) Choice model specification, substitution and spatial structure effects: A simulation experiment, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 17, pp. 29 47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgers, A.W.J. and Timmermans, H.J.P. (1988) A context sensitive model of spatial choice behavior, in R.G Golledge. and H.J.P. Timmermans (Eds), Behavioural Modeling Approaches in Geography and Urban Planning, pp 159 179 (Kent: Croom Helm, Beckenham).
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, J.L. and Ben-Akiva, M. (2001) Activity-based disaggregate travel demand model system with activity schedules, Transportation Research A, 35, pp. 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Cantillo, V. and Ortuzar, J. de D. (2006) Implications of thresholds in discrete choice modeling. Transport Reviews, 26, pp. 667–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascetta, E. (2001) Transportation Systems Engineering: Theory and Methods (Boston: Kluwer Academic Publisher).
   Google Scholar
• Cascetta, E. (2008) Transportation Systems Analysis: Models and Applications (New York: Springer) forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Cascetta, E. and Papola, A. (2001) Random utility models with implicit availability/perception of choice alternatives for the simulation of travel demand. Transportation Research C, 9, pp. 249–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascetta, E. and Papola, A. (2005) Dominance among alternatives in random utility models: a general framework and an application to destination choice. Proceedings of the European Transport Conference, October, Strasbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Cascetta, E., Pagliara, F. and Axhausen K. W. (2007) The use of dominance variables in spatial choice set generation. Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Transport Research, Berkeley, 24–28 June.
   Google Scholar
• Dai, J. (1998) Calibration and test of a discrete choice model with endogenous choice sets, Geographical Analysis, 30, pp. 95–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, A. (1982) Applicability of disaggregate models of behavior: a question of methodology, Transportation Research A, 16, pp. 363–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Barra, T., B. Perez, and J. Anez (1993) Multidimensional Path Search and Assignment. Proceedings of the 21st PTRC Summer Meeting, pp. 307–319.
   Google Scholar
• Fotheringham, A.S. (1983) A new set of spatial interaction models: the theory of competing destination, Environment and Planning A, 15, pp. 15–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotheringham, A.S. (1988) Consumer store choice and choice set definition, Marketing Science, 7, pp. 299–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frejinger, E. and Bierlaire, M. (2007) Capturing correlation with subnetworks in route choice models, Transportation Research B, 41, pp. 363–378.
   Google Scholar
• Gaudry, M. J. I. and Dagenais, M. G. (1979) The Dogit model, Transportation Research B, 13, pp. 105–111.
   Google Scholar
• Gautschi, D.A. (1981) Specification of patronage models for retail center choice, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, pp. 162–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillbride, T. and Allenby, G. (2004) A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive and compensatory screening rules, Marketing Science, 23, pp. 391–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golledge, R.G. and Timmermans, H.J.P. (1990) Applications of behavioral research on spatial problems I. Cognition, Progress in Human Geography, 14, pp 57 99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han Q., Arentze T.A., Timmermans, H.J.P, Janssens D. and Wets G. (2007) Modeling the dynamic formation of activity location choice-sets. Paper to be presented at the 11th World Conference on Transport Research, Berekeley, 24–28 June.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, J. L. and Louviere, J. J. (1990) The external validity of choice models based on laboratory choice experiments. In Fisher, M. M., Nijkamp, P. and Papageorgoiu, Y. Y. (Eds), Spatial choices and processes, (Amsterdam: North-Holland).
   Google Scholar
• Kitamura, R. and Lam, T. N. (1984) A model of constrained binary choice. In Volmuller, J. and Hamerslag, R. (Eds), Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Utrecht: VNU Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koppelman F. and Sethi, V. (2000) Closed form discrete- choice models, in D. A. Hensher and K. J. Button (Eds) Handbook of transport modeling, Volume 1, of Handbook in Transport, pp. 211–222 (Oxford: Pergamon Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, M.P. (1997) GISICAS: An activity-based travel decision support system using a GIS-interfaced computational process model, in D. F. Ettema H.J.P and Timmermans (Eds), Activity-based approaches to activity analysis, pp. 263–282 (Oxford: Pergamon Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, M. P. and Hong, X. D. (1998) Network-based constraints-oriented choice set formation using GIS, Geographical Systems, 5, pp. 139–162.
   Google Scholar
• Lerman, S. R. and Louviere, J. J. (1978) The use of functional measurement to identify the form of utility functions in travel demand models, Transportation Research Record 673, pp. 78–85.
   Google Scholar
• Lerman, S. R. (1984) Recent advances in disaggregate demand modeling, in M. Florian (Ed.), Transportation Planning Models, (Amsterdam: North-Holland).
   Google Scholar
• Manski, C. (1977) The structure of random utility models, Theory and Decision, 8, pp. 229–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. (1978) Modeling the choice of residential location, in A. Karlqvist, L. Lundqvist, F. Snickars and J. W. Weibull (Eds), Spatial interaction theory and residential location, pp. 75–96 (Amsterdam: North-Holland).
   Google Scholar
• Miller, E.J. and O’Kelly, M.E. (1983) Estimating shopping destination models from travel diary data, Professional Geographer, 35, pp. 440–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morikawa, T. (1995) Correcting state dependence and serial correlation in the RP/SP combined estimation method, Transportation, 21, pp. 153–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedugadi P. (1987) Formation and use of a consideration set: implications for marketing and research on consumer choice. PhD dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, O., Daly, A. and Frederiksen, R. (2002) A stochastic route choice model for car travelers in the Copenhagen region, Networks and Spatial Economics, 2, pp. 327–346.
   Google Scholar
• Ortuzar, J. de D. and Willumsen, L.G. (2001) Modeling Transport (New York: John Wiley & Sons).
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, G.R. and Hauber, A.B. (1998) Spatial boundaries and choice set definition in a random utility model of recreation demand, Land Economics, 74, pp. 32–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellegrini, P. A., Fotheringham, S. and Lin, G. (1997) An empirical evaluation of parameter sensitivity to choice set definition in shopping destination choice models, Papers in Regional Science, 76, pp. 257–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellegrini, P.A. and Fotheringham A.S. (2002) Modeling spatial choice: a review and synthesis in a migration context, Progress in Human Geography, 26, pp. 487–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, A. J. (1982) Search models and choice set generation, Transportation Research A, 16, pp. 403–419.
   Google Scholar
• Rushton, G. (1969) Analysis of spatial behavior by revealed space preferences, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 59, pp. 391–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shocker A.D., Ben-Akiva M. E., Boccara B. and Nedugadi P. (1991) Consideration set influences on consumer decision-making and choice: issues, models and suggestions, Marketing Letters, 2, pp. 181–197.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, D. M. (2006) Constrained destination choice set generation: a comparison of GIS-based approaches. Proceedings of the 85th annual meeting on Transportation Research Board, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Scrogin D., Hofler R., Boyle K and Milon J. W. (2004) An efficiency approach to choice set generation. University of Central Florida, working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Southworth, F. (1981) Calibration of multinomial logit models of mode and destination choice, Transportation Research Part A, 15, pp. 315–325.
   Google Scholar
• Swait, J. and Ben-Akiva, M. E. (1986) Constraints on individual travel behavior in a Brazilian city, Transportation Research Record, 1085, pp. 75–85.
   Google Scholar
• Swait, J. and Ben-Akiva, M. E. (1987) Incorporating random constraints in discrete models of choice set generation, Transportation Research B, 21, pp. 91–102.
   Google Scholar
• Swait, J. (2001) Choice set generation with the generalized extreme value family of discrete choice models, Transportation Research B, 35, pp. 643–666.
   Google Scholar
• Termansen, M., Mcclean, C.J., and Skov-Petersen, H. (2004) Recreational site choice modeling using high-resolution spatial data, Environment and Planning A, 36, pp. 1085–1099.
   Google Scholar
• Thill, J.C. (1992) Choice set formation for destination choice modeling, Progress in Human Geography, 16, pp. 361–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, H.J.P. (1979) A spatial preference model of regional shopping behavior, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 70, pp. 45 48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, H.J.P., Arentze, T.A. and Joh, C.-H. (2002) Analyzing space-time behavior: new approaches to old problems, Progress in Human Geography, 26, pp. 175–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, H.J.P., Borgers, A.W.J. and Veldhuisen, K.J. (1986) A hybrid compensatory noncompensatory model of residential preference structures. Journal of Housing and Environmental Research, 1, pp. 227 233.
   Google Scholar
• Train, K. (2003) Discrete choice methods with simulation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J. and Ben-Akiva, M. (2002) Generalized random Utility Model, Mathematical Social Sciences, 3, pp. 303–343.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, H. C. W. L. (1977) On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of user benefit, Environment and Planning A, 9, pp. 285–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, H. C. W. L. and Ortuzar, J. de D. (1982) Behavioral theories of dispersion and the mis-specification of travel demand models, Transportation Research B, 16, pp. 167–219.
   Google Scholar
• Willumsen, L. G. and Ortuzar, J de D. (2001) Modeling Transport (New York: John Wiley & Sons).
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A.G. (1970) Entropy in urban and regional modeling (London: Pion Press).
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, J. and Guo, J.Y. (2008) A destination choice model incorporating choice set formation, TRB 87th Annual Meeting cd-rom, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar