Framework for the development of the Agent-based Dynamic Activity Planning and Travel Scheduling (ADAPTS) model

REFERENCES

• Arentze, T. and H. Timmemans (2000). ALBATROSS — A Learning Based Transportation Oriented Simulation System. European Institute of Retailing and Services Studies (EIRASS), Technical University of Eindhoven.
   Google Scholar
• Arentze, T., H. Timmermans, D. Janssens, and G. Wets (2006). Modeling Short-term Dynamics in Activity-Travel Patterns: From Aurora to Feathers. Paper presented at the Innovations in Travel Modeling Conference Austin, TX, May 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Auld, J.A., A. Mohammadian and S.T. Doherty (2008). Analysis of Activity Conflict Resolution Strategies. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2054, 10–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auld, J.A., A. Mohammadian and K. Wies (2009a). Population Synthesis with Region-Level Control Variable Aggregation. Forthcoming in the Journal of Transportation Engineering (Available online March 9, 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Auld, J. A., A. Mohammadian and M. Roorda (2009b). Implementation of a Scheduling Conflict Resolution Model in an Activity Scheduling System. Forthcoming in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Auld, J. A., C. Williams, A. Mohammadian and P. Nelson (2009c). An automated GPS-based prompted recall sur-vey with learning algorithms. Transportation Letters: The International Journal of Transportation Research, (1), 1, 59–79.
   Google Scholar
• Bhat, C.R., J.Y. Guo, S. Srinivasan and A. Sivakumar (2004). Comprehensive Econometric Microsimulator for Daily Activity-Travel Patterns. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1894, 57–66.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A.F. and S.T. Doherty (2008). Examining the Nature and Extent of the Activity-travel Preplanning Decision Process. Proceedings of the 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, January 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, S. T. (2005). How far in advance are activi-ties planned? Measurement challenges and anal-ysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1926, 41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, S. T. and A. Mohammadian (2003). Application of Artificial Neural Network Models to Activity Scheduling Time Horizon. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1854, 43–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, S. T., E. Nemeth, M. Roorda and E. J. Miller (2004). Design and Assessment ofthe Toronto Area Computerized Household Activity Scheduling Survey. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1894, 140–149.
   Google Scholar
• Ettema, D.F. and H.J.P. Timmermans (1997). Theories and Models of Activity Patterns. Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis. Elsevier, pp 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Garling, T., M.-P. Kwan and R.G. Golledge (1994). Computational-process modeling of household travel activity scheduling. Transportation Research B. 25, 355–364.
   Google Scholar
• Golledge, R.G., M.-P. Kwan and T. Garling (1994). Computational-Process Modelling of Household Travel Decisions Using a Geographical Information System. Working Paper, UCTC No. 218, The University of California Transportation Center, University of California at Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes-Roth, B. and F. Hayes-Roth (1979). A cognitive model of planning. Cognitive Science. 3, 275–310.
   Google Scholar
• Joh, C-H. (2004). Measuring and Predicting Adaptation in Multidimensional Activity-Travel Patterns. Ph.D.Thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Faculteit Bouwkunde, Capaciteitsgroep Stedebouw, Eindhoven University Press Facilities.
   Google Scholar
• Joh, C-H., T. Arentze and H. J.P Timmermans (2002). Modeling Individuals' Activity-Travel Rescheduling Heuristics: Theory and Numerical Experiments. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1807, 16–25.
   Google Scholar
• Joh, C-H., S.T. Doherty and J.W. Polak (2005). Analysis of Factors Affecting the Frequency and Type of Activity Schedule Modification. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1926, 19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Lee,M.S. and McNally,M.G. (2001). Experiments with A Computerized Self-Administered Activity Survey, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1752, 91–99.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. and M.G. McNally (2006). An empirical investiga-tion on the dynamic processes of activity scheduling and trip chaining. Transportation: Planning, Policy, Research, Practice, Vol. 33 No. 6, pp 553–565.
   Google Scholar
• Litwin, M. (2005). Dynamic Household Activity Scheduling Processes. Ph.D. Thesis., Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Litwin, M. and E.J. Miller (2004). Event-Driven Time-Series Based Dynamic Model of Decision Making Processes: Philosophical Background and Conceptual Framework. Proceedings of the 83th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, January 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, E.J. (2005), Propositions for Modelling Household Decision-Making, in Integrated Land-use and Transportation Models: Behavioural Foundations, M. Lee-Gosselin and S.T. Doherty (eds), Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 21–60.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadian, A . and S.T. Doherty (2005), Mixed Logit Model of Activity Scheduling Time Horizon Incorp-orating Spatial-Temporal Flexibility Variables, Transportation Research Record : Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1926, 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadian, A. and S.T. Doherty (2006). Modeling Activity Scheduling Time Horizon: Duration of Time between Planning and Execution of Pre-Planned Activities, Transportation Research Part A, Volume 40, Issue 6, Elsevier, pp. 475–490.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A., and H.A. Simon (1972). Human Problem Solving. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Roorda, M.J., S.T. Doherty and E.J. Miller (2005). Operationalising Household Activity Scheduling Models: Addressing Assumptions and the Use of New Sources of Behavioral Data. Integrated Land-use and Transportation Models: Behavioural Foundations, M. Lee-Gosselin and S.T. Doherty (eds), Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 61–85.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz, T. and H. Timmermans (2006). Changing the Timing of Activities in Resolving Scheduling Conflicts. Transportation. 33, 429–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz, T. and Roorda, M.J. (2008). Analysis of Planning Decisions During the Activity-Scheduling Process. Proceedings of the 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, January 21–5, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, J. and R. Golledge (2007). Real-time tracking of activ-ity scheduling/schedule execution within a unified data collection framework Transportation Research Part A, Volume 41, Elsevier, pp. 444–463.
   Google Scholar