Publication Cover
Transportation Letters
The International Journal of Transportation Research
Volume 2, 2010 - Issue 1
218
Views
52
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original

Using incentives as traffic management tool: empirical results of the "peak avoidance" experiment

Pages 39-51 | Published online: 07 Sep 2013

REFERENCES

  • Arentze, T. and H. Timmermans (2007), Congestion pric-ing scenarios and change of job or residential location: Results of a stated adaptation experiment, Journal of Transport Geography, 15, 56–61.
  • Ben-Elia, E., D. Ettema (2009), Carrots versus sticks: Rewarding commuters for avoiding the rush-hour-a study of willingness to participate, Transport policy, 16, 68–76.
  • Bonsall, P., J. Shires, J. Maule, B. Matthews and J. Beale (2007), Responses to complex pricing signals: Theory, evi-dence and implications for road pricing, Transportation Research A, 41, 672–683.
  • Church, A.H. (1993), Estimating the effect of incentives on mail survey response rates: A meta-analysis, The Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 62–79.
  • CPB (2005) Economische Analyse van Verschillende Vormen van Prijsbeleid voor het Wegverkeer, Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, Den Haag.
  • Ettema, D. and E. Verhoef (2006), Using rewards as a traffic management tool: Behavioural effects of reward strategies, paper presented at IATBR Conference, Kyoto.
  • Gärling T. and S. Fujii (2006), Travel Behavior Modification: Theories, Methods, and Programs, paper presented to 11th IATBR conference, Kyoto, Japan.
  • Geller, S. (2001), Sustaining participation in a safety pro-cess: 10 relevant principles from behavioral science, Professional Safety, September 2001, 24–29.
  • Guyll, M., R. Spoth and C. Redmond (2003), The effects of incentives and research requirements of participation rates for a community-based preventive intervention research study, The Journal of Primary Prevention, 24, 25–41.
  • Harland, J., M. White, C. Drinkwater, D. Chinn, L. Farr and D. Howel (1999), The Newcastle exercise project: A ran-domised controlled trial of methods to promote physical activity in primary care, British Medical Journal, 319, 828–832.
  • Haq, G., J. Whitelegg, S. Cinderby, A. Owen (2008), The use of personalised social marketing to foster voluntary behavioral change for sustainable travel and lifestyles, Local Environment, 13, 549–569.
  • Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1979), Prospect theory: An anal-ysis of decision under risk Econometrica, 47, 263–292.
  • Knockaert, J., M. Bliemer, D. Ettema, D. Joksimovic, A. Mulder, J. Rouwendal, D. van Amelsfort (2007), Experimental design and modelling Spitsmijden, Bureau Spitsmijden, The Hague.
  • Moses, S. H., T.J. Clark (2004), Effect of prize draw incentive on the response rate to a postal survey of obstetricians and gynaecologists: A randomised controlled trial, BMC Health Services Research, 4, 14–16.
  • Porter, S.R., M.E. Whitcomb (2003),The impact of lottery incentives on student survey response rates, Research in Higher Education, 44, 389–407.
  • Rouwendal, J. and E.T. Verhoef (2006), Basic economic principles of road pricing: From theory to applications, Transport Policy, 2, 106–114.
  • Sansgiry, S.S., S. Chanda, T. Lemke and J.E. Szilagyi (2006), Effect of incentives on student performance on Milemarker examinations, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 70, 1–5.
  • Schwanen, T. and D. Ettema (2007), Coping with unreliable transportation when collecting children. Examining parents' behavior with cumulative prospect theory, paper presented to TRB Annual meeting, Washington D.C.
  • Spitsmijden (2007), Effecten van belonen, Spitsmijden Group.
  • Tillema, T., D. Ettema and B. van Wee (2010), Road pricing and relocation decisions of households, accepted for publication in Urban Studies.
  • Verhoef, E.T., M. Bliemer, L. Steg and G.P. van Wee (2008) Pricing in Road Transport: A Multi-Disciplinary Perspective, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (forthcoming).
  • Willimack, D.K., H. Schuman, B. Pennell, J.M. Lepkowski (1995), Effects of a Prepaid Nonmonetary Incentive on Response Rates and Response Quality in a Face-to-Face Survey, The Public Opinion Quarterly, 59, 78–92.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.