Lane changing models: a critical review

REFERENCES

• Adelakun, A. and Cherry, C. 2009. Exploring Truck Driver Perceptions and Preferences: Congestion and Conflict, Managed Lanes, and Tolls. Proceeding of the 88th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, CD-ROM.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, K. I., Ben-Akiva, M., Koutsopoulos, H. N. and Mishalani, R. G. 1996. Models of Freeway Lane Changing and Gap Acceptance Behavior. Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on the Theory of Traffic Flow and Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, K. I. 1999. Modeling Drivers' Acceleration and Lane Changing Behavior. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Master of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Alexiadis, V., Gettman and Hranac, R. 2004. Next Generation Simulation (NGSIM): Identification and Prioritization of Core Algorithm Categories, Department ofTransportation Federal HighWay Administration (FHWA).
   Google Scholar
• Al-Kaisy, A. F., Hall, F. L. and Reisman, E. S. 2002. Developing passenger car equivalents for heavy vehicles on freeways during queue discharge flow. Transportation Research A 36(8): 725–742.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Kaisy, A. and Hall, F. 2003. Guidelines for Estimating Capacity at Freeway Reconstruction Zones. Journal of Transportation Engineering 129(5): 572–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Kaisy, A. and Jung, Y. 2005. Examining the Effect of Heavy Vehicles on Traffic Flow during Congestion. Proceedings of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Annual Meeting, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Kaisy, A., Jung, Y. and Rakha, H. 2005. Developing Passenger Car Equivalency Factors for Heavy Vehicles during Congestion. Journal of Transportation Engineering 131(7): 514–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, J. H., Amin, M. R., Cassidy, M. and Chung, K. 2003. Validation of Daganzo's Behavioral Theory of Multi-lane Traffic Flow: Final Report. Institute of Transportation Studies California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways (PATH).
   Google Scholar
• Brackstone, M., McDonald, M. and Wu, J. 1998. Lane Changing on the Motorway: Factors Affecting Its Occurrence, and Their Implications. 9th International Conference on Road Transport Information and Control, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Transportation Statistics. 2002. US Department of Transportation, National Transportation Statistics, BTS02-08, Washington DC, US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, M. J. and Bertini, R. L. 1999. Observations at a Freeway Bottleneck. International Symposium of Transportation and Traffic Theory. Amsterdam, Netherlands: 107–124.
   Google Scholar
• Cate, M. A. and Urbanik II, T. 2003. Another View of Truck Lane Restrictions. Proceeding of the 82th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting. Washington, DC., CD-ROM.
   Google Scholar
• Champion, A., Espié, S. and Auberlet, J. M. 2001. Behavioral Road Traffic Simulation with ARCHISIM. Summer Computer Simulation Conference, Orlando, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Champion, A., Zhang, M. Y., Auberlet, J. M. and Espié, S. 2002. Behavioral Simulation: Towards High-Density Network Traffic Studies. International Conference on Traffic and Transportation Studies, (Guilin China).
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W. Y., Huang, D. W., Huang, W. N. and Huang, W. L. 2004. Traffic Flow on a 3-Lane Highway. International Journal of Modern Physics B 18 (31-32): 4161–4171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhury, C. F., Ben-Akiva, M. E., Toledo, T., Lee, G. and Rao, A. 2007. Modeling Cooperative Lane Changing and Forced Merging Behavior. Proceeding of the 86th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting. Washington, DC., CD-ROM.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, K. 2005. Pacific Highway Upgrade-F3 to Raymond Terrace Route (Consultancy Report). Maunsell Australia Pty Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Daganzo, C. F. 2002. A Behavioral Theory of Multi-lane Traffic Flow, Part II: Merges and the Onset of Congestion. Transportation Research B 36: 159–169.
   Google Scholar
• Daganzo, C. F., Cassidy, M. J. and Bertini, R. L. 1999. Possible Explanations of Phase Transitions in Highway Traffic. Transportation Research A 33(5): 365–379.
   Google Scholar
• Das, S. and Bowles, B. A. 1999. Simulations of Highway Chaos Using Fuzzy Logic. 18th International Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society (NAFIPS), New York, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Das, S., Bowles, B. A., Houghland, C. R., Hunn, S. J. and Zhang, Y. 1999. Microscopic Simulations of Freeway Traffic Flow. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual Simulation Symposium IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Doshi, A. and Trivedi, M. 2008. A Comparative Exploration of Eye Gaze and Head Motion Cues for Lane Change Intent Prediction. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Eindhoven, Netherlands: 49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Eidehall, A., Pohl, J., Gustafsson, F. and Ekmark, J. 2007. Toward Autonomous Collision Avoidance by Steering. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 8(1): 84–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Hadouaj, S., Espié, S. and Drogoul, A. 2000. To Combine Reactivity and Anticipation: The Case of Conflicts Resolution In a Simulated Road Traffic. The Second International Workshop on Multi-Agent Based Simulation, Boston, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Espié, S., Saad, F., Schnetzler, B., Bourlier, F. and Djemame, N. 1994. Microscopic Traffic Simulation and Driver Behavior Modeling: The ARCHISIM Project. The Strategic Highway Research Program and Traffic Safety on Two continents, Lille, France.
   Google Scholar
• Gipps, P. G. 1981. A Behavioral Car-Following Model for Computer Simulation. Transportation Research B 15(2): 105–111.
   Google Scholar
• Gipps, P. G. 1986. A Model for the Structure of Lane-changing Decisions. Transportation Research B 20(5): 403–414.
   Google Scholar
• Hatipoglu, C., Ozguner, U., Redmill, K. A. 2003. Automated Lane Change Controller Design. IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems 4 (1): 13–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidas, P., 2002. Modelling Lane Changing and Merging in Microscopic Traffic Simulation. Transportation Research C 10(5-6): 351–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidas, P. 2005. Modelling Vehicle Interactions in Microscopic Simulation of Merging and Weaving. Transportation Research C 13(1): 37–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn, S. P. and Bovy, P. H. L. 2001. State-of-the-art of Vehicular Traffic Flow Modeling. Special Issue on Road Traffic Modelling and Control of the Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, 215(4): 283–303.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, W. L. 2010. A Kinematic Wave Theory of Lane-changing Vehicular Traffic. Transportation Research B 44(8-9):1001–1021.
   Google Scholar
• Knospe,W., Santen, L., Schadschneider, A. and Schreckenberg, M. 2002. A Realistic Two-lane Traffic Model for Highway Traffic. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 35(15): 3369–3388.
   Google Scholar
• Kiefer, R. J. and Hankey, J. M. 2008. Lane Change Behavior with a Side Blind Zone Alert System. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40(2): 683–690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li-sheng, J., Wen-ping, F., Ying-nan, Z., Shuang-bin, Y. and Hai-jing, H. 2009. Research on Safety Lane Change Model of Driver Assistant Aystem on Highway. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Shaanxi, China.
   Google Scholar
• Laval, J. A. and Daganzo, C. F. 2006. Lane Changing in Traffic Stream. Transportation Research B 40(3): 251–264.
   Google Scholar
• Lygeros, J., Godbole, D. N., Sastry, S. 1998. Verified Hybrid Controllers for Automated Vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 43(4): 522–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, X. 2004. Toward an Integrated Car-following and Lane-changing Model Based on Neural-fuzzy Approach. Helsinki summer workshop.
   Google Scholar
• Maerivoet, S., Moor, B. D. 2005. Cellular Automata Models of Road Traffic. Physics Reports 419(1): 1–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mar, J., Lin, H. T. 2005. The Car-following and Lane-changing Collision Prevention System Based on the Cascaded Fuzzy Inference System. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 54(3): 910–924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauch, M. and Cassidy, M. J. 2002. Freeway Traffic Oscillations: Observations and Predictions. Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Elsevier Science Ltd., Adelaide, Australia, 2002, 653–673
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, M., Wu, J. and Brackstone, M. 1997. Development of a Fuzzy Logic Based Microscopic Motorway Simulation Mode. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Boston, U.S.A.
   Google Scholar
• Moridpour, S., Rose, G. and Sarvi, M. 2009. Modelling the heavy vehicle drivers' lane changing decision under con-gested traffic conditions. Journal of Road and Transport Research, 18(4): 49–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moridpour, S., Rose, G. and Sarvi, M. 2010. The effect of sur-rounding traffic characteristics on lane changing behav-ior. Journal of Transportation Engineering ( In Press, ISSN 1943-5436-online).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel, K., Wolf, D. E., Wagner, P. and Simon, P. 1998. Two-lane Traffic Rules for Cellular Automata: A Systematic Approach. Physical Review E 58(2): 1425–1437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salyucci, D. D. and Mandalia, H. M. 2007. Lane-change detection using a computational driver model. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 49(3): 532–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarvi, M. and Kuwahara, M. 2009. Improving the efficiency of freight traffic at congested freeway merging sections. Transportation Letters Journal, Volume 1, Issue 4.
   Google Scholar
• Sasoh, A., Ohara, T. 2002. Shock Wave Relation Containing Lane Change Source Term for Two-Lane Traffic Flow. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 71(9): 2339–2347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlenoff, C., Madhavan, R. and Kootbally, Z. 2006. PRIDE: A Hierarchical, Integrated Prediction Framework for Autonomous On-Road Driving. Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Orlando, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Sukthankar, R., Baluja, S. and Hancock, J. 1997. Evolving an Intelligent Vehicle for Tactical Reasoning in Traffic. Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation, New Mexico, 519–524.
   Google Scholar
• Toledo, T. 2003. Integrated Driving Behavior Modeling. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Doctor of Philosophy.
   Google Scholar
• Toledo, T., Koutsopoulos, H. N. and Ben-Akiva, M. 2003. Modeling Integrated Lane-changing Behavior. Proceeding of the 82nd Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting. Washington, DC, Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Toledo, T., Koutsopoulos, H. N. and Ben-Akiva, M. 2009. Estimation of an Integrated Driving Behavior Model. Transportation Research C, 17(4): 365–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uddin, M. S., Ardekani, S. A., 2002. An Observational Study of Lane Changing on Basic Freeway Segment. Proceeding of the 81st Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, G. T. and Hounsell, N. B. 2005. Microscopic Modeling of Motorway Diverges. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 5(3): 139–158.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, N. A., Suzuki, T., Chung, E. and Kuwahara, M. 2007. Tactical Driver Lane Change Model Using Forward Search. Proceeding of the 86th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washingtonb DC.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, N. A., Suzuki, T. and Kuwahara, M. 2007. Driver Model for Traffic Simulation, with Tactical Lane Changing Behavior. Monthly journal of the Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo 59(3): 188–191.
   Google Scholar
• Wiedemann, R. and Reiter, U. 1992. Microscopic Traffic Simulation: the Simulation System Mission, Background and Actual State. CEC Project ICARUS (V1052), Final Report, vol. 2, Appendix A, Brussels: CEC.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. J. 2006. Review of Urban Congestion Trends, Impacts and Solutions (Consultancy Report). Traffic Management Systems for Australian Urban Freeways, Australian Road Research Board (ARRB) Consulting-Council of Australian Governments.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J., Brackstone, M. and McDonald, M. 2000. Fuzzy Sets and Systems for a Motorway Microscopic Simulation Model. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Special Issue on Fuzzy Sets in Traffic and Transport Systems 116(1): 65–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J. Brackstone, M. and McDonald, M. 2003. The Validation of a Microscopic Simulation Model: A Methodological Case Study. Transportation Research C 11(6): 463–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C. H. and Regan, A. C. 2009. Prioritization of Potential Alternative Truck Management Strategies using the Analytical Hierarchy Process. Proceeding of the 88th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting. Washington, DC, Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Q. and Koutsopoulos, H. N. 1996. A Microscopic Traffic Simulator for Evaluation of Dynamic Traffic Management Systems. Transportation Research C 4(3): 113–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar