References
- von Noorden GK. Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility. St. Louis: CV Mosby Co.; 2002. p. 222–241.
- Simons K. Early Visual Development: Normal and Abnormal. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993. p. 201–213.
- Sirenteanu R, Fronius M: Different patterns of retinal correspondence in the central and peripheral visual field of strabismics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989; 30: 2020–2033.
- Herzau V: How useful is anomalous correspondence. Eye 1996; 10: 266–269.
- Jennings J: Anomalous retinal correspondence—A review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1985; 5: 357–368.
- Boeder P. Eighth Annual Richard G. Scobee Memorial Lecture. “Response shift” vs. anomalous retinal correspondence. Am Orthopt J 1978; 28: 44–53.
- Wright K. Pediatric Ophthalmol Strabismus. St. Louis: Mosby Co.; 1999. p. 119–137.
- Katsumi O, Tanaka Y, Uemura Y: Anomalous retinal correspondence in esotropia. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1982; 26: 166–174.
- Arnoldi KA: Monfixation with eso-, exo-, or hypertropia. Is there a difference? Am Orthopt J 2001; 51: 55–66.
- Ansons AM, Davis H. Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Motility Disorders, 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd.; 2001. p. 311.
- Lambert SJ, Murray JM, Ryan JB: Effect of target size on anomalous sensory responses in bagolini striated lens test. Am J Optom Physiol Optics [now Optom Vis Sci] 1987; 64: 179–185.