The Compared Predictive Value of Brückner, Acuity, and Strabismus from Pediatric Referrals

References

• Calonge N, USPSTF: Screening for visual impairment in children younger than 5 years: Recommendation statement. Ann Fam Med 2004; 2: 263–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson J, Junger G. Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1968. Public Health Paper No. 34.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold RW, Armitage MD, Gionet EG, et al: The cost and yield of photoscreening: Impact of photoscreening on overall pediatric ophthalmic costs. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2005; 42: 103–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheiman M, Amos C, Ciner E, Marsh-Tootle W, Moore B, Rouse M. Pediatric Eye and Vision Examination: Reference Guide for Clinicians. St. Louis: American Optometric Association; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr N, Arnold R: Vision screening for children: Current trends, technology and legislative issues. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2004; 15: 454–459.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tongue A, Cibis G: Brückner test. Ophthalmology 1981; 88: 1041–1044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe LD, Guyton DL: The light that leaks: Brückner and the red reflex. Surv Ophthalmol 1984; 28: 665–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller JM, Hall HL, Greivenkamp JE, Guyton DL: Quantification of the Brückner test for strabismus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995; 36: 897–905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson J: Eye examination in infants, children and young adults by pediatricians: AAP Policy Statement. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 860–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broderick P: Pediatric vision screening for the family physician. Am Fam Physician 1998; 5: 691–700.
   Google Scholar
• Kothari M, Turakhia J, Vijayalakshmi P, Karthika A, Nirmalan P: Can the Brückner Test be used as a rapid screening test to detect amblyogenic factors in developing countries? Am Orthopt J 2003; 53: 121–126.
   Google Scholar
• Valavil PK, Dhananjayan C: Effectiveness of the Brückner Test performed by nonmedical volunteers as a screening method for strabismus and anisometropia. Poster presented at Chicago, Illinois: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 10/16/05.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold RW: Vision screening in Alaska: Experience with Enhanced Brückner Test. Alaska Med 1993; 35: 204–208.
   Google Scholar
• Donahue SP, Arnold RW, Granet D, Wagner R: Pediatric photoscreening: Eye to eye. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2004; 41: 72–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson JT: Use of photoscreening for children's vision screening. Pediatrics 2002; 109: 524–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howland H, Howland B: Photorefraction: A technique for study of refractive state at a distance. J Opt Soc Am 1974; 64: 240–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paysse EA, Williams GC, Coats DK, Williams EA: Detection of red reflex asymmetry by pediatric residents using the Brückner reflex versus the MTI photoscreener. Pediatrics 2001; 108: e74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosner J, Rosner J: Parents as screeners for strabismus in their children. J Visual Impair Blindness 1988; 82: 193–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvarnstrom G, Jakobsson P, Lennerstrand G: Screening for visual and ocular disorders in children: Evaluation of the system in Sweden. Acta Paediatr 1998; 87: 1173–1179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salcido AA, Bradley J, Donahue SP: Predictive value of photoscreening and traditional screening of preschool children. J AAPOS 2005; 9: 114–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salcido AA, Johnson T, Bradley J, Donahue SP: Predictive value of photoscreening and traditional screening of preschool children. Paper presented at AAPOS Annual Meeting; 3/24/03; Waikoloa, Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• Leman RE, Armitage MD, Arnold RW: The receiver-operator curve for flip-card surround HOTV in younger school children. Am Orthopt J 2005; 55: 128–135.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold RW: Highly specific photoscreening at the Alaska State Fair: Valid Alaska Blind Child Discovery photoscreening and interpretation. Alaska Med 2003; 45: 34–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnold RW, Gionet E, Jastrzebski A, Kovtoun T, Armitage M, Coon L: The Alaska Blind Child Discovery project: Rationale, methods and results of 4000 screenings. Alaska Med 2000; 42: 58–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donahue S, Arnold R, Ruben JB: Preschool vision screening: What should we be detecting and how should we report it? Uniform guidelines for reporting results from studies of preschool vision screening. J AAPOS 2003; 7: 314–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold RW, Arnold AW, Stark L, Arnold KK, Leman RE, Armitage MD: Amblyopia detection by camera (ADBC): Gateway to portable, inexpensive, vision screening. Alaska Med 2004; 46: 63–72.
   Google Scholar
• Paysse EA, Camejo L, Hussein MA, Coats DK: Parent-administered visual acuity testing: Is it reliable and can it improve office efficiency? J AAPOS 2004; 8: 332–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson AC, Donahue SP: Review of results of preschool vision screening. Poster presented at Chicago, Illinois: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 10/16/05.
   Google Scholar
• PVIPS: Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the vision in preschoolers study. Ophthalmology 2004; 111: 637–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VIPS, Dobson V, Quinn G, et al: Preschool vision screening tests administered by nurse screeners compared with lay screeners in the Vision in Preschoolers Study. IOVS 2005; 46: 2639–2648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaba JN, Johnson RA, Reynolds WT: Vision examinations for all children entering public school: The new Kentucky law. Optometry 2003; 74: 149–158.
   Google Scholar