References
- Jain S, Arora I, Azar DT: Success of monovision in presbyopes: Review of literature and potential applications to refractive surgery. Surv Ophthalmol 1996; 40: 491–499.
- Johannsdottir KR, Stelmach LB: Monovision: A review of the scientific literature. Optom Vis Sci 2001; 78: 646–651.
- Evans BJ: Monovision: A review. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2007; 27: 417–439.
- Jain S, Ou R, Azar DT: Monovision outcome in presbyopic individuals after refractive surgery. Ophthalmology 2001; 108: 1430–1433.
- Handa T, Mukuno K, Uozato H, Niida T, Shoji N, Minei R, Nitta M, Shimizu K: Ocular dominance and patient satisfaction after monovision induced by intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 769–774.
- Nitta M, Shimizu K, Niida T: The influence of ocular dominance on monovision: The interaction between binocular visual functions and the state of dominant eye's correction. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi (Japanese) 2007; 111: 435–440.
- Ito M, Shimizu K, Amano R, Handa T: Assessment of visual performance in pseudophakic monovision. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37: 2001–2005.
- Iida Y, Shimizu K, Ito M: Pseudophakic monovision using monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses: Hybrid monovision. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35: 710–714.
- Walls GL: A theory of ocular dominance. Arch Ophthalmol 1951; 50: 283–292.
- Lederer J: Brainedness, handedness and eyedness. Aust J Optom 1970; 53: 323–347.
- Schor C, Landsman L, Erickson P. Ocular dominance and interocular suppression of blur in monovision. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987; 64: 723–730.
- Robboy MW, Cox IG, Erickson P: Effects of sighting and sensory dominance on monovision high and low contrast visual acuity. CLAO J 1990; 16: 299–301.
- Ooi TL, He ZJ: Sensory eye dominance. Optometry 2001; 72: 168–178.
- Seijas O, Gómez de Liaño P, Gómez de Liaño R, Roberts CJ, Piedrahita E, Diaz E: Ocular dominance diagnosis and its influence in monovision. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 144: 209–216.
- Suttle C, Alexander J, Liu M, Ng S, Poon J, Tran T: Sensory ocular dominance based on resolution acuity, contrast sensitivity, and alignment sensitivity. Clin Exp Optom 2009; 92: 2–8.
- Liu L, Tyler CW, Schor CM: Failure of rivalry at low contrast: Evidence of a suprathreshold binocular summation process. Vision Res 1992; 32: 1471–1479.
- Levelt WJM. On Binocular Rivalry. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton; 1968.
- Handa T, Mukuno K, Uozato H, Niida T, Shoji N, Shimizu K: Effects of dominant and nondominant eyes in binocular rivalry. Optom Vis Sci 2004; 81: 377–382.
- McGraw KO, Wong SP: Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Meth 1996; 1: 30–46.
- Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall; 2000.
- Porac C, Coren S: Sighting dominance and binocular rivalry. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1978; 55: 208–213.
- Blake R, Camisa J: On the inhibitory nature of binocular rivalry suppression. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1979; 5: 315–323.
- Kommerell G, Schmitt C, Kromeier M, Bach M: Ocular prevalence versus ocular dominance. Vision Res 2003; 43: 1397–1403.
- Handa T, Uozato H, Higa R, Nitta M, Kawamorita T, Ishikawa H, Shoji N, Shimizu K: Quantitative measurement of ocular dominance using binocular rivalry induced by retinometers. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32: 831–836.
- Wright KW, Guemes A, Kapadia MS, Wilson SE: Binocular function and patient satisfaction after monovision induced by myopic photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 25: 177–182.