When the form stands in the way of content – a study of student teachers’ reading practices

References

• Ax J., Ponte P. Moral issues in educational praxis: a perspective from pedagogiek and didactiek as human sciences in continental Europe. Pedagogy, Culture & Society. (2010); 18: 29–42. [PubMedAbstract] [PubMedCentralFullText].
   Google Scholar
• Biggs J. B., Tang C. Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does. 2011; Open University Press: Berkshire.
   Google Scholar
• Britzman D. P. Practice makes practice: a critical study of learning to teach. 2003; N.Y., State University of New York Press: Albany.
   Google Scholar
• Catterall M., Maclaran P. Focus group data and qualitative analysis programs: coding the moving picture as well as the snapshots. Sociological Research Online. 1997; 2: 53–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith M., Zeichner K. M. Studying teacher education: the report of the AERA Panel on research and teacher education. 2005; Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Diseth A. Validation of a Norwegian version of the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST): application of structural equation modeling. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 2001; 45: 381–395.
   Google Scholar
• Diseth A., Martinsen O. Approaches to learning, cognitive style, and motives as predictors of academic achievement. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology. 2003; 23: 195–207.
   Google Scholar
• Diseth Å Students’ evaluation of teaching, approaches to learning, and academic achievement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 2007; 51: 185–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund-myrskog G. Students’ ideas of learning. Conceptions, approaches and outcomes in different educational contexts. 1996; Åbo Academy University Press: Åbo.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle N. Teaching for understanding at university: deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking. 2009; Palgrave: Basingstoke.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle N. J., Peterson E. R. Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: relationships with study behaviour and influences of learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research. 2004; 41: 407–428.
   Google Scholar
• Floden R. E., Meniketti M. Research on the effects of coursework in the arts and sciences and in the foundations of education. Studying Teacher Education: The Report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education. 2005; Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Francis H., Hallam S. Genre effects on higher education students’ text reading for understanding. Higher Education. 2000; 39: 279–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman P., Mcdonald M. Back to the future: directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal. 2008; 45: 184–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundem B., Hopmann S. Didaktik and/or Curriculum - and international dialogue. 1998; Peter Lang: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Haggis T. Constructing images of ourselves? A critical investigation into ‘approaches to learning’ research in higher education. British Educational Research Journal. 2003; 29: 89–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallam S., Francis H. Is my understanding yours? A study of higher education students’ reading for understanding and the effects of different texts. Learning and Instruction. 1998; 8: 83–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh H.-F., Shannon S. E. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research. 2005; 15: 1277–1288. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Kember D., Jamieson Q., Pomfret M., Wong E. T. Learning approaches, study time and academic performance. Higher Education. 1995; 29: 329–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember D., Leung D. Y. Influences upon students’ perceptions of workload. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology. 1998; 18: 293–307.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger J. Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal. 1995; 311: 299–302. [PubMed Abstract] [PubMed CentralFull Text].
   Google Scholar
• Laurillard D. Rethinking university teaching: a conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. 2002; Routledge/Falmer: London.
   Google Scholar
• Lawless C., Richardson J. 2004. Monitoring the experiences of graduates in distance education. Customer Services for Taylor & Francis Group Journals, 325 Chestnut Street, Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106.
   Google Scholar
• Lea M. R., Street B. Lea M. R., Stierer B. Student writing and staff feedback in higher education: an academic literacies approach. Student Writing in Higher Education: New Contexts. 2000; Guildford: The Society. 32–46.
   Google Scholar
• Lizzio A., Wilson K., Simons R. University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education. 2002; 27: 27–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughran J. Developing a pedagogy of teacher education: understanding teaching and learning about teaching. 2006; London, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marton F., Carlsson M. A., Halasz L. Differences in understanding and the use of reflective variation in reading. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 1992; 62: 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton F., Hounsell D., Entwistle N. The experience of learning: implications for teaching and studying in higher education. 1997; Edinburgh, Scottish Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marton F., Säljö R. On qualitative differences in learning: I – outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 1976; 46: 4–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton F., Säljö R. Marton F., Hounsell D, Entwistle N. Approaches to learning. The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education. 1997; Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press. 39–58. (eds.), 2nd ed..
   Google Scholar
• Marton F., Wenestam C.-G, Gruneberg M., Morris P. E., Sykes R. N. Qualitative differences in retention when a text is read several times. Practical Aspects of Memory: Current Research and Issues. 1988; New York: Wiley. 633–643.
   Google Scholar
• Mclean M. Can we relate conceptions of learning to student academic achievement?. Teaching in Higher Education. 2001; 6: 399–413.
   Google Scholar
• Niemi H. Active learning: a cultural change needed in teacher education and schools. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2002; 18: 763–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersen R. C. Studenters opplevelse og evaluering av undervisning og læringsmiljø: Presentasjon av Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) – og validering av tre norske versjoner, Erfaringer med studiet (EMS) [Students’ experience and evaluation of teaching and learning environment: presentation of the Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) - and validation of three Norwegian versions (EMS). 2007; Halden: Høgskolen i Østfold.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersen R. C. Validation of approaches to studying inventories in a Norwegian context: in search of ‘quick-and-easy’ and short versions of the ASI. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 2010; 54: 239–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosser M., Trigwell K. Understanding learning and teaching. 1999; Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press: Buckingham.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden P. A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: the Course Experience Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education. 1991; 16: 129–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson J. T. Approaches to studying, conceptions of learning and learning styles in higher education. Learning and Individual Differences. 2011; 21: 288–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson J. T. E. Researching student learning: approaches to studying in campus-based and distance education. 2000; Society for Research into Higher Education: Buckingham.
   Google Scholar
• Roness D. Still motivated? The motivation for teaching during the second year in the profession. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2011; 27: 628–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadlo G., Richardson J. T. E. Approaches to studying and perceptions of the academic environment in students following problem-based and subject-based curricula. Higher Education Research and Development. 2003; 22: 253–274.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 2009; Los Angeles, Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sjølie E. The role of theory in teacher education - reconsidered from a student teacher perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 2014; 46: 729–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjølie E., Østern A. L. Forthcoming. Student teachers’ learning within the practice architectures of teacher education.
   Google Scholar
• Tait H., Entwistle N., Mccune V, RUST C. ASSIST: A reconceptualisation of the Approaches to Studying Inventory. Improving Students as Learners. 1998; Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff & Learning Development. 262–271.
   Google Scholar
• Trigwell K., Prosser M. Improving the quality of student learning: the influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education. 1991; 22: 251–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermunt J. D. Relations between student learning patterns and personal and contextual factors and academic performance. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning. 2005; 49: 205–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volet S. E., Chalmers D. Investigation of qualitative differences in university students’ learning goals, based on an unfolding model of stage development. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 1992; 62: 17–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb G. Deconstructing deep and surface: towards a critique of phenomenography. Higher Education. 1997; 33: 195–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar