Logics and ambivalence – professional dilemmas during implementation of an inclusive education practice

References

• Ainscow M. Clark C., Dyson A., Millward A. Would it work in theory? Arguments for practitioner research and theorizing in the special needs field. Theorizing Special Education. 1998; London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ahrne G. Social organizations. Interaction inside, outside and between organizations. 1994; London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson M., Kärreman D. Alvesson M., Svenningsson S. Processes in organizations. Processer i organisationer. Organizations, management and processes. Organisationer, ledning och processer. 2007; Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Booth T., Ainscow M. The index for inclusion. 2002; Bristol: Centre for Studies in Inclusive Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron D. L., Nilholm C., Persson B. School district administrators’ perspectives on special education policy and practice in Norway and Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research. 2012; 14(3): 212–231.
   Google Scholar
• Cassell C., Symon G. Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. 2004; London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clark C., Dyson A., Millward A. Clark C., Dyson A., Millward A. Theorizing special education. Time to move on?. Theorizing Special Education. 1998; London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska-Joerges B. Exploring complex organizations: a cultural perspective. 1992; Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P., Powell W. Powell W., DiMaggio P. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. 1991; Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ekström P. Makten att definiera. En studie av hur beslutsfattare formulerar villkor för specialpedagogisk verksamhet. (Göteborg Studies in Educational Sciences, 209) . 2004; Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Forlin C. Developing and implementing quality inclusive education in Hong Kong: implications for teacher education. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs. 2010; 10(1): 177–184.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan M. The new meaning of educational change. 1991; 3rd ed, London: Routledge/Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood R., Díaz A. M., Li S. X., Lorente J. C. The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science. 2010; 21(2): 521–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimshaw J., Thomas R., MacLennan G., Fraser C., Ramsay C. R., Vale L., Whitty P., Eccles M. P., Matowe L., Shirran L., Wensing M. J. P., Dijkstra R. F., Donaldson C. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technology Assessment. 2004; 8(6): iii–iv, 1–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göransson K., Magnússon G., Nilholm C. Barrow T., Östlund D. Inclusive education in Sweden – past, present and future issues. Bildning för alla! En pedagogisk utmaning. 2012; Kristianstad: Högskolan i Kristianstad.
   Google Scholar
• Göransson K., Nilholm C., Karlsson K. Inclusive education in Sweden? A critical analysis. International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2011; 15(5): 541–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugaard Jakobsen C., Hels T., McLaughlin W. J. Barriers and facilitators to integration among scientists in transdisciplinary landscape analyses: a cross-country comparison. Forest Policy and Economics. 2004; 6: 15–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausstätter R. S. In support of unfinished inclusion. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 2014; 58(4): 424–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotulainen R., Takala M. Parents’ views on the success of integration of students with special education needs. International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2014; 18(2): 140–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ineland J, Molin M., Sauer L. Discursive tensions in late modern society – on education and work for people with intellectual disabilities in Sweden. European Journal of Social Education. 2014. (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Leung C. H., Mak K. Y. Training, understanding, and the attitudes of primary school teachers regarding inclusive education in Hong Kong. The International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2010; 14(8): 829–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livesey E. A., Noon J. M. Implementing guidelines: what works?. Archives of Disease in Childhood – Education and Practice. 2007; 92(5): 129–134.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall C., Rossman G. B. Designing qualitative research. 2010; 5th ed, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer J., Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology. 1977; 83: 55–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer J. W., Scott R. Organizational environment: ritual and rationality. 1983; Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McLeskey J., Waldron N. Making differences ordinary in inclusive classrooms. Intervention in School and Clinic. 2007; 42(3): 162–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilholm C., Almqvist L., Göransson K., Lindqvist G. What is the problem? Explanations of school difficulties by eight occupational groups. International Journal of Special Education. 2013; 28(1): 161–172.
   Google Scholar
• Nilholm C. Special education, inclusion and democracy. European Journal of Special Needs Education. 2006; 21: 431–445.
   Google Scholar
• Nilholm C. Barn och elever i svårigheter: en pedagogisk utmaning. 2012; Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Nilholm C., Persson B., Hjerm M., Runesson S. Kommunernas arbete med elever i behov av stöd. 2007; Rapport 2007: 2. Högskolan i Jönköping.
   Google Scholar
• Norwich B. Dilemmas of difference, inclusion and disability: international perspectives on placement. European Journal of Special Needs Education. 2008; 23(4): 287–304.
   Google Scholar
• Novotna G. Competing institutional logics in the development and implementation of integrated treatment for concurrent disorders in Ontario: a case study. Journal of Social Work. 2014; 14(3): 260–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pache A.-C., Santos F. When worlds collide: the internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review. 2010; 35(3): 455–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters S., Reid D. K. Resistance and discursive practice: promoting advocacy in teacher undergraduate and graduate programs. 2006; San Francisco, CA: Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting. 7–11 April.
   Google Scholar
• Persson B. On other people's terms: schools’ encounters with disabled students. European Journal of Special Needs Education. 2008; 23(4): 337–347.
   Google Scholar
• Piekkari R., Welch C., Paavilainen E. The case study as disciplinary convention: evidence from international business journals. Organizational Research Methods. 2009; 12(3): 567–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott W. R. Institutions and organizations. 1995; Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shevlin M., Winter E., Flynn P. Developing inclusive practice: teacher perceptions of opportunities and constraints in the Republic of Ireland. International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2013; 17(10): 1119–1133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skidmore D. Inclusion: the dynamic of school development. 2004; Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton P. H., Ocasio W. Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: executive succession in the higher education publishing industry 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology. 1999; 105: 801–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. 1994; Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Vehmas S. Special needs: a philosophical analysis. International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2010; 14(1): 87–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin R. K. Case study research: design and methods. 2009; 4th ed, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar