1,225
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Thematic Section

Navigating the Evaluation Web: Evaluation in Swedish Local School Governance

, &
Article: 29913 | Published online: 01 Sep 2016

References

  • Act. Skollag. 2010:800. [Education act].
  • Andersen V. N., Dahler-Larsen P., Strömbæk Pedersen C. Quality assurance and evaluation in Denmark. Journal of Education Policy. 2009; 24(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 135–147.
  • Argyris C., Schön D. Organizational learning II: theory, method and practice. 1996; Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Askim J. The demand side of performance measurement: explaining councillors’ utilization of performance information in policymaking. International Public Management Journal. 2008; 12(1Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 24–47.
  • Boswell C. The political uses of expert knowledge: immigration policy and social research. 2009; Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Contandriopoulos D., Lemire M., Denis J.-L., Tremblay É. Knowledge exchange processes in organizations and policy arenas: a narrative systematic review of the literature. Milbank Quarterly. 2010; 88(4Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 444–483.
  • Cousins J. B., Leithwood K. A. Current empirical research in evaluation utilization. Review of Educational Research. 1986; 56(3Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 331–364.
  • Dahler-Larsen P. Surviving the routinization of evaluation: the administrative use of evaluations in Danish municipalities. Administration and Society. 2000; 32(1Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 70–92.
  • Dahler-Larsen P. Kushner S., Norris N. Constitutive effects of performance indicator systems. Dilemmas of Engagement: Evaluation and the New Public Management. 2007; Amsterdam, Elsevier. 17–35.
  • Dahler-Larsen P. The evaluation society. 2012a; Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.
  • Dahler-Larsen P. Evaluation as a situational or universal good? Why evaluability assessment for evaluation systems is a good idea, what it might look in practice, and why it is fashionable. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration. 2012b; 16(3Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 29–46.
  • Dahler-Larsen P. Constitutive effects of performance indicators: getting beyond unintended consequences. Public Management Review. 2013; 16(7Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 969–986.
  • de Wolf I. F., Janssens F. J. G. Effects and side effects of inspections and accountability in education: an overview of empirical studies. Oxford Review of Education. 2007; 33(3Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 379–396.
  • East. Economic and organizational steering in municipal school production. Audit report 3/2012. 2012; East municipality: Sweden.
  • East. Minutes of Education Committee meeting, 16 May 2013. 2013; East municipality: Sweden.
  • Elstad E. Schools which are named, blamed and shamed by the media: school accountability in Norway, Educational Assessment. , Evaluation and Accountability. 2009; 21(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 173–189.
  • Ehren M. C. M., Altrichter H., McNamara G., O'Hara J. O. Impact of school inspections on improvement of schools: describing assumptions on causal mechanisms in six European countries, Educational Assessment. , Evaluation and Accountability. 2013; 25(1Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 3–43.
  • Elmore R. F. Fuhrman S. H., Elmore R. F. Conclusion: the problem of stakes in performance-based accountability systems. Redesigning Accountability Systems for Education. 2004; New York: Teachers College Press. 274–296.
  • Hanberger A. The real functions of evaluation and response systems. Evaluation. 2011; 17(4Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 327–349.
  • Hanberger A. Framework for exploring the interplay of governance and evaluation. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration. 2013; 16(3Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 9–28.
  • Hanberger A. What PISA intends to and can possibly achieve: a critical programme theory analysis. European Educational Research Journal. 2014; 13(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 167–180.
  • Hanberger A. Evaluation in local school governance: a framework of analysis. Education Inquiry. 2016. in this issue.
  • Hansen M., Lander R. Om statens verktyg för skoljämförelser. Vem vill dansa SALSA? [The state's tools for school comparisons. Who wants to dance the Salsa?]. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige. 2009; 14(1Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 1–21.
  • Jacobson C., Carter R. W., Hockings M., Kelman J. Maximizing conservation evaluation utilization. Evaluation. 2011; 17(1Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 53–71.
  • Keddie A. Thriving amid the performative demands of the contemporary audit culture: a matter of school context. Journal of Education Policy. 2013; 28(6Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 750–766.
  • Koretz D. Measuring up: what educational testing really tells us. 2009; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Leeuw F. Reconstructing program theories: methods available and problems to be solved. American Journal of Evaluation. 2003; 24(1Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 5–20.
  • Leeuw F., Furubo J.-E. Evaluation systems: what are they and why study them?. Evaluation. 2008; 14(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 157–169.
  • Levin B. Governments and education reform: some lessons from the last 50 years. Journal of Education Policy. 2010; 25(6Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 739–747.
  • Lingard B., Sellar S. “Catalyst data”: perverse systemic effects of audit and accountability in Australian schooling. Journal of Education Policy. 2013; 28(5Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 634–656.
  • Lindgren L., Hanberger A., Lundström U. Evaluation systems in a crowded policy space: implications for local school governance. Education Inquiry. 2016. this issue.
  • Liverani A., Lundgren H. Evaluation systems in development aid agencies: an analysis of DAC peer reviews, 1996–2004. Evaluation. 2007; 13(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 241–256.
  • Merki K. M. Special issue: accountability systems and their effects on school processes and student learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 2011; 37(4Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 177–179.
  • Mintrop H., Trujillo T. The practical relevance of accountability systems for school improvement: a descriptive analysis of California schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 2007; 29(4Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 319–352.
  • Nilsson M. The role of assessments and institutions for policy learning: a study on Swedish climate and nuclear policy formation. Policy Sciences. 2005; 38(4Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 225–249.
  • OECD. OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education, SWEDEN. 2011; Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Power M. The audit society: rituals of verification. 1997; Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Ravitch D. The death and life of the great American school system: how testing and choice are undermining education. 2010; New York: Basic Books.
  • Schillemans T., Bovens M. Dubnick M. J., Frederickson H. G. The challenge of multiple accountability: does redundancy lead to overload?. Accountable Governance: Problems and Promises. 2011; Armonk: ME Sharpe. 3–21.
  • Shulha L., Cousins J. B. Evaluation use: theory, research and practice since 1986. Evaluation Practice. 1997; 18(3Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 195–207.
  • Smith P., Abbott I. Local responses to national policy: the contrasting experiences of two Midlands cities to the Academies Act 2010. Educational Management Administration and Leadership. 2014; 42(3Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 341–354.
  • Trujillo Tina M. The disproportionate erosion of local control: urban school boards, high-stakes accountability, and democracy. Educational Policy. 2012; 27(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 334–359.
  • Weiss C. H., Bucuvalas M. Weiss C. H. The challenge of social research to decision making. Using Social Research in Public Policy Making. 1977; Lexington,, MA: Lexington Books. 213–234.
  • Whitby K. School inspection: recent experiences in high performing education –systems - literature review. 2010; Reading, UK: CfBT Education Trust.
  • Wiliam D. What is assessment for learning?. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 2011; 37(1Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 3–14.
  • Yanow D. Conducting interpretive policy analysis. 2000; Newbury Park, CA: Sage.