Evaluation in Local School Governance: A Framework for Analysis

References

• Andersen V. N., Dahler-Larsen P., Strömbæk Pedersen C. Quality assurance and evaluation in Denmark. Journal of Education Policy. 2009; 24(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 135–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson A., Burgess S., Croxsonc B., Gregg P., Propper C., Slater H., Wilson D. Evaluating the impact of performance-related pay for teachers in England. Labour Economics. 2009; 16(3Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 251–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball S. The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy. 2003; 18(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 215–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behn R. Rethinking democratic accountability. 2001; Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bouckaert G., Halligan J. Peters G., Pierre J. Performance and performance management. Handbook of Public Policy. 2006; London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Breakspear S. The policy impact of PISA: an exploration of the normative effects of international benchmarking in school system performance. OECD Education Working Papers. 2012; Paris: OECD Publishing. No. 71.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman A. Social research methods. 2012; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer F. Reframing public policy: discursive politics and deliberative practices. 2003; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho L. The fabrications and travels of a knowledge-policy instrument. European Educational Research Journal. 2012; 11(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 172–188.
   Google Scholar
• Creemers B., Reezigt G. School effectiveness and school improvement: sustaining links. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 1997; 8(4Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 396–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creemers B., Reezigt G. Linking school effectiveness and school improvement: the background and outline of the project. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 2005; 16(4Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 359–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahler-Larsen P. Surviving the routinization of evaluation: the administrative use of evaluations in Danish municipalities. Administration & Society. 2000; 32(1Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 70–92.
   Google Scholar
• Dahler-Larsen P. The evaluation society. 2012a; Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dahler-Larsen P. Evaluation as a situational or universal good? Why evaluability assessment for evaluation systems is a good idea, what it might look in practice, and why it is fashionable. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration. 2012b; 16(3Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 29–46.
   Google Scholar
• Dahler-Larsen P. Constitutive effects of performance indicators: getting beyond unintended consequences. Public Management Review. 2013; 16(7Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 969–986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day C. School reform and transitions in teacher professionalism and identity. International Journal of Educational Research. 2002; 37(8Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 677–692.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek J. S. Democracy in capitalist times: ideals, limits, and struggles. 1996; New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ehren M., Leeuw F. L., Scheerens J. On the impact of the Dutch Educational Supervision Act. American Journal of Evaluation. 2005; 26(1Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 60–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehren M. C. M., Altrichter H., McNamara G., O'Hara J. O. Impact of school inspections on improvement of schools: describing assumptions on causal mechanisms in six European countries. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability. 2013; 25(1Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 3–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elstad E. Schools which are named, blamed and shamed by the media: school accountability in Norway. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability. 2009; 21(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 173–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evetts J. A new professionalism? Challenges and opportunities. Current Sociology. 2011; 59(4Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 406–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss Hansen H. Systemic evaluation governance: new logics in the development of organizational fields. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration. 2013; 16(3Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 47–64.
   Google Scholar
• Gottweis H. Peters G., Pierre J. Argumentative policy analysis. Handbook of Public Policy. 2006; London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Green J. Education, professionalism and the quest for accountability: hitting the target but missing the point. 2013; New York and Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer M., Wagenaar H. Deliberative policy analysis: understanding governance in the network society. 2003; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger P, Heck R., Murphy J. Teacher evaluation and school improvement: an analysis of the evidence. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability. 2014; 26(1Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 5–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanberger A. Evaluation of and for democracy. Evaluation. 2006; 12(1Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 17–37.
   Google Scholar
• Hanberger A. Democratic accountability in decentralized governance. Scandinavian Political Studies. 2009; 32(1Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanberger A. The real functions of evaluation and response systems. Evaluation. 2011; 17(4Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 327–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanberger A. Framework for exploring the interplay of governance and evaluation. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration. 2013; 16(3Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 9–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hanberger A. What PISA intends to and can possibly achieve: a critical programme theory analysis. European Educational Research Journal. 2014; 13(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 167–180.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton L. S., Stecher B. M., Russell J. L., Marsh J. A., Miles J. Fuller B., Henne M. K., Hannum E. Accountability and teaching practices: school-level actions and teacher responses. Strong States, Weak Schools: The Benefits and Dilemmas of Centralized Accountability (Research in the Sociology of Education) . 2008; St. Louis, MO: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves A. Changing teachers, changing times: teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. 1994; Trowbridge, UK: Redwood Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie J. A. C. Visible learning: a synthesis of 800+ meta-analyses on achievement. 2009; London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman A. O. Exit, voice and loyalty: responses to decline in firms, organizations and states. 1970; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmgren M., Johansson O., Nihlfors E., Skott P. Local school governance in Sweden: boards, parents and democracy. Journal of School Public Relations. 2012; 33(1Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 8–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hood C. A public management for all seasons?. Public Administration. 1991; 69(1Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood C. Gaming in targetworld: the targets approach to managing British public services. Public Administration Review. 2006; 66(4Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 515–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood C. Public management by numbers as a performance-enhancing drug: two hypotheses. Public Administration Review. 2012; 72(s1Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): S85–S92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn E.-H. Governance and governance networks in Europe: an assessment of 10 years of research on the theme. Public Management Review. 2008; 10(4Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 505–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koretz D. Measuring up: what educational testing really tells us. 2009; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leeuw F., Furubo J.-E. Evaluation systems: what are they and why study them?. Evaluation. 2008; 14(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 157–169.
   Google Scholar
• Levin B. Governments and education reform: some lessons from the last 50 years. Journal of Education Policy. 2010; 25(6Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 739–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidström A. Multi-level governance: the case of Umeå. 2004; Umeå, Sweden: Umeå University, Department of Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard B. Policy as numbers: accounting for educational research. The Australian Educational Researcher. 2011; 38(4Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 355–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard B., Sellar S. “Catalyst data”: perverse systemic effects of audit and accountability in Australian schooling. Journal of Education Policy. 2013; 28(5Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 634–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren L., Hanberger A., Lundström U. Evaluation systems in a crowded policy space: implications for local school governance. 2016. Education Inquiry, 7(3), 30202, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/edui.v7.30202.
   Google Scholar
• Liverani A., Lundgren H. Evaluation systems in development aid agencies: an analysis of DAC peer reviews, 1996–2004. Evaluation. 2007; 13(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 241–256.
   Google Scholar
• Lubienski C. Do quasi-markets foster innovation in education? A comparative perspective. OECD Education Working Papers. 2009. No. 25. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Marcussen M., Torfing J. Democratic network governance in Europe. 2007; Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mausethagen S. Accountable for what and to whom? Changing representations and new legitimation discourse among teachers under increased external control. Journal of Educational Change. 2013a; 14(4Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 423–444.
   Google Scholar
• Mausethagen S. A research review of the impact of accountability policies on teachers’ workplace relations. Educational Research Review. 2013b; 9: 16–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merki K. M. Special issue: accountability systems and their effects on school processes and student learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 2011; 37(4Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 177–179.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrop H., Trujillo T. The practical relevance of accountability systems for school improvement: a descriptive analysis of California schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 2007; 29(4Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 319–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montin S. Moderna kommuner. 2007; Malmö, Sweden: Liber. [Modern municipalities] (3rd ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan R. Accountability’: an ever-expanding concept?. Public Administration. 2000; 78(3Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 555–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musset P. School choice and equity: current policies in OECD countries and a literature review. OECD Education Working Papers. 2012; Paris: OECD Publishing. No. 66.
   Google Scholar
• National Agency for Education (NAE). Skolverkets allmänna råd med kommentarer. Systematiskt kvalitetsarbete – för skolväsendet. 2012; Stockholm: Skolverket. [The National Agency for Education's recommendations for systematic quality work for compulsory schools].
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). PISA 2009 results: what students know and can do. Student performance in reading, mathematics and science. 2009; Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education, SWEDEN. 2011; Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Synergies for better learning: an international perspective on evaluation and assessment. 2013; Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ozga J. Governing education through data in England: from regulation to self-evaluation. Journal of Education Policy. 2009; 24(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 149–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierre J., Peters G. Governance, politics and the state. 2000; New York-Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt C., Bouckaert G. Public management reform: a comparative analysis – new public management, governance, and the neo-Weberian state. 2011; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power M. The audit society: rituals of verification. 1997; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Propper C., Wilson D. The use and usefulness of performance measures in the public sector. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 2003; 19(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 250–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravitch D. The death and life of the great American school system: how testing and choice are undermining education. 2010; New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds D., Sammons P., De Fraine B., Van Damme J., Townsend T., Teddlie C., Stringfield S. Educational effectiveness research (EER): a state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 2014; 25(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 197–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rist R. C. Rist R. C., Stame N. The “E” in monitoring and evaluation: using evaluative knowledge to support a result-based management system. From Studies to Streams: Managing Evaluative Systems. 2006; New Brunswick,, NJ: Transaction Publishers. 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Rist R. C., Stame N. From studies to streams: managing evaluative systems. 2006; New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rönnberg L. Exploring the intersection between marketisation and central state control through school inspection. Education Inquiry. 2011; 2(4Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 689–707.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. Kommunalt huvudmannaskap i praktiken: en kvalitativ studie [Municipal responsibility in practice: a qualitative study] . 2011; Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Smith P., Abbott I. Local responses to national policy: the contrasting experiences of two Midlands cities to the Academies Act 2010. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 2014; 42(3Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 341–354.
   Google Scholar
• SOU. 22. Rektorn och styrkedjan. Betänkande av Utredningen om rektorernas arbetssituation inom skolväsendet [The principal and the chain of command. Investigation of principals’ work situation in compulsory education]. 2015; Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Stame N. Rist R. C., Stame N. Introduction: streams of evaluative knowledge. From Studies to Streams: Managing Evaluative Systems, vii-xxi. 2006; New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Supovitz J., Taylor B. Systemic education evaluation. Evaluating the impact of systemwide reform in education. American Journal of Evaluation. 2005; 26(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 204–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trujillo Tina M. The disproportionate erosion of local control: urban school boards, high-stakes accountability, and democracy. Educational Policy. 2012; 27(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 334–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber M. Basic concepts in sociology. 1962; London: Peter Owen.
   Google Scholar
• Yanow D. Conducting interpretive policy analysis. 2000; Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar