3,124
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Thematic Section

School evaluation in Sweden in a local perspective: A synthesis

, , , &
Article: 30115 | Published online: 01 Sep 2016

References

  • Argyris C., Schön D. Organizational learning II: theory, method and practice. 1996; Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Ball S.P., Maguire M., Braun A. How schools do policy. Policy enactments in secondary schools. 2012; London: Routledge.
  • Behn R. Rethinking democratic accountability. 2001; Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Carlbaum S. Customers, partners and rights-holders: school evaluations of websites. Education Inquiry. 2016; 7(3): 29971, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/edui.v7.29971.
  • Carvalho L. The fabrications and travels of a knowledge-policy instrument. European Educational Research Journal. 2012; 11(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 172–188.
  • Colebatch H.K. Governance as a conceptual development in the analysis of policy. Critical Policy Studies. 2009; 3(1Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 58–67.
  • Dahler-Larsen P. Surviving the routinization of evaluation: the administrative use of evaluations in Danish municipalities. Administration & Society. 2000; 32(1Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 70–92.
  • Dahler-Larsen P. The evaluation society. 2012a; Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.
  • Dahler-Larsen P. Evaluation as a situational or universal good? Why evaluability assessment for evaluation systems is a good idea, what it might look in practice, and why it is fashionable. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration. 2012b; 16(3Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 29–46.
  • Dahler-Larsen P. Constitutive effects of performance indicators: getting beyond unintended consequences. Public Management Review. 2013; 16(7Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 969–986.
  • Englund T. et al . Vadå likvärdighet?: studier i utbildningspolitisk språkanvändning. 2008; Göteborg: Daildalos.
  • Fazekas M., Burns T. Exploring the complex interaction between governance and knowledge in education. 2012. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 67, OECD Publishing.
  • Holmgren M., Johansson O., Nihlfors E., Skott P. Local school governance in Sweden: boards, parents and democracy. Journal of School Public Relations. 2012; 33(1Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 8–28.
  • Hoyle E., Wallace M. Gewirtz S., Mahony P., Cribb A. Leadership for professional practice. Changing Teacher Professionalism. International Trends, Challenges and Ways Forward. 2009; London; New York: Routledge. 67–80.
  • Hanberger A. Democratic accountability in decentralized governance. Scandinavian Political Studies. 2009; 32(1Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 1–22.
  • Hanberger A. The real functions of evaluation and response systems. Evaluation. 2011; 17(4Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 327–349.
  • Hanberger A. Framework for exploring the interplay of governance and evaluation. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration. 2013; 16(3Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 9–28.
  • Hanberger A. Evaluation in local school governance: a framework of analysis. Education Inquiry. 2016; 7(3): 29914, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/edui.v7.29914.
  • Hanberger A., Lindgren L., Lundström U. Navigating the evaluation web: evaluation in Swedish local school governance. Education Inquiry. 2016; 7(3): 29913, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/edui.v7.29913.
  • Hult A., Lundström U., Edström C. Balancing managerial and professional demands: school principals as evaluation brokers. Education Inquiry. 2016; 7(3): 29960, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/edui.v7.29960.
  • Hult A., Edström C. Teacher ambivalence towards school evaluation: promoting and ruining teacher professionalism. Education Inquiry. 2016; 7(3): 30200, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/edui.v7.30200.
  • Keddie A. Thriving amid the performative demands of the contemporary audit culture: a matter of school context. Journal of Education Policy. 2013; 28(6Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 750–766.
  • Larsson S. A pluralist view of generalization in qualitative research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2009; 32(1Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 25–38.
  • Lingard B. Policy as numbers: accounting for educational research. The Australian Educational Researcher. 2011; 38(4Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 355–382.
  • Lawn M. Standardizing the European education policy space. European Educational Research Journal. 2011; 10(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 259–272.
  • Lindgren L., Hanberger A., Lundström U. Evaluation systems in a crowded policy space: implications for local school governance. Education Inquiry. 2016; 7(3): 30202, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/edui.v7.30202.
  • Liverani A., Lundgren H. Evaluation systems in development aid agencies: an analysis of DAC peer reviews, 1996–2004. Evaluation. 2007; 13(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 241–256.
  • Lundahl Christian. Varför nationella prov? Framväxt, dilemman, möjligheter. 2009; Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Mangez E., Hilgers M. The field of knowledge and the policy field in education: PISA and the production of knowledge for policy. European Educational Research Journal. 2012; 11(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 189–205.
  • Mausethagen S. Accountable for what and to whom? Changing representations and new legitimation discourse among teachers under increased external control. Journal of Educational Change. 2013; 14(4Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 423–444.
  • Montin S. Moderna kommuner [Modern municipalities]. 2007; Malmö, Sweden: Liber. (3rd ed.).
  • Nilsson M. The role of assessments and institutions for policy learning: a study on Swedish climate and nuclear policy formation. Policy Sciences. 2005; 38(4Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 225–249.
  • OECD. OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education, SWEDEN. 2011; Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. Improving schools in Sweden: an OECD perspective. 2015; Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Ravitch D. The death and life of the great American school system: how testing and choice are undermining education. 2010; New York: Basic Books.
  • Reynolds D., Sammons P., De Fraine B., Van Damme J., Townsend T., Teddlie C., Stringfield S. Educational effectiveness research (EER): a state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 2014; 25(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 197–230.
  • Schillemans T., Bovens M. Dubnick M. J., Frederickson H. G. The challenge of multiple accountability: does redundancy lead to overload?. Accountable Governance. Problems and Promises. 2011; Armonk: ME Sharpe. 3–21.
  • Skolverket. Kommunalt huvudmannaskap i praktiken: en kvalitativ studie [Municipal responsibility in practice: a qualitative study]. 2011; Stockholm: Skolverket.
  • SOU 2015:22. Rektorn och styrkedjan. Betänkande av Utredningen om rektorernas arbetssituation inom skolväsendet [The principal and the chain of command. Investigation of principals’ work situation in compulsory education]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
  • Stehr N., Grundmann R. How does knowledge relate to political action?. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. 2012; 25(1Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 29–44.