3,365
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Thematic Section

Teacher ambivalence towards school evaluation: promoting and ruining teacher professionalism

&
Article: 30200 | Published online: 01 Sep 2016

References

  • Ball S. The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy. 2003; 18(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 215–228.
  • Ball S., Maguire M., Braun A., Hoskins K., Perryman J. How schools do policy: policy enactments in secondary schools. 2012; London and New York: Routledge.
  • Bergh A. Local quality work in an age of accountability – between autonomy and control. Journal of Education Policy. 2015; 30(4): 590–607. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2015.1017612.
  • Biesta G. Gewirtz S., Mahony P., Hextall I., Cribb A. Values and ideals in teachers’ professional judgement. Changing Teacher Professionalism: International Trends, Challenges and Ways Forward. 2009; London: Routledge. 184–194.
  • Biesta G. Good education in an age of measurement: ethics, politics, democracy. 2010; Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
  • Dahler-Larsen P. Ozga J., Dahler-Larsen P., Segerholm C., Simola H. Afterword: Evaluation as a field and as a source of reflection: comments on how QAE restructures education now and in the future. Fabricating Quality in Education: Data and Governance in Europe. 2011; London and New York: Routledge. 150–159.
  • Dahler-Larsen P. The evaluation society. 2012; Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Dahler-Larsen P. Constitutive effects of performance indicators: getting beyond unintended consequences. Public Management Review. 2014; 16(7Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 969–986.
  • Day C. School reform and transitions in teacher professionalism and identity. International Journal of Educational Research. 2002; 37(8Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 677–692.
  • Englund T., Solbrekke T. D. Om innebörder i lärarprofessionalism. [On meanings of teacher professionalism. In Swedish]. Pedagogisk Forskning i Sverige. [Pedagogical Research in Sweden]. 2015; 20(3–4Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 168–194.
  • Evetts J. A new professionalism? Challenges and opportunities. Current Sociology. 2011; 59(4Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 406–422.
  • Evetts J. Professionalism: value and ideology. Current Sociology. 2013; 61(5-6Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 778–796.
  • Fitzgerald T. The continuing politics of mistrust: performance management and the erosion of professional work. Journal of Educational Administration and History. 2008; 40(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 113–128.
  • Green J. Education, professionalism and the quest for accountability: hitting the target but missing the point. 2011; New York: Routledge.
  • Hanberger A., Gisselberg K. IFAD's, EuropeAid's and Sida's management response system: a comparison of the systems’ design and practice. 2008; Umeå, Sweden: Umeå University, Umeå Centre for Evaluation Research. Evaluation reports No. 23.
  • Hargreaves A. Changing teachers, changing times: teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. 1994; Trowbridge, UK: Redwood Books.
  • Hargreaves A. Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice. 2000; 6(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 151–182.
  • Helgoy I., Homme A. Towards a new professionalism in school? A comparative study of teacher autonomy in Norway and Sweden. European Educational Research Journal. 2007; 6(3Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 132–149.
  • Hodkinson H. Gewirtz S., Mahony P., Hextall I., Cribb A. Improving schoolteachers’ workplace learning. Changing Teacher Professionalism: International Trends, Challenges and Ways Forward. 2009; London: Routledge. 184–194.
  • Hult A., Lundström U., Edström C. Balancing managerial and professional demands: school principals as evaluation brokers. Education Inquiry. 2016; 7(3): 29960, doi: 10.3402/edui.v7.29960.
  • Hultqvist E. Om lärarnas förändrade yrkesvillkor [About teachers’ changed working conditions]. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige. 2011; 16(3Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 203–213.
  • Lindgren L. Nya utvärderingsmonstret: om kvalitetsmätning i den offentliga sektorn. 2:a reviderade upplagan. [The new evaluation monster: on quality measurement in the public sector]. 2nd revised edition . 2014; Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
  • Lundström U. Systematic quality work in Swedish schools. Intensions and dilemmas. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration. 2015; 19(1Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 3–23.
  • Mark M. M., Henry T. G. The mechanisms and outcomes of evaluation influence. Evaluation. 2004; 10(1Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 35–57.
  • Mausethagen S. Accountable for what and to whom? Changing representations and new legitimation discourse among teachers under increased external control. Journal of Educational Change. 2013a; 14(4Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 423–444.
  • Mausethagen S. A research review of the impact of accountability policies on teachers’ workplace relations. Educational Research Review. 2013b; 9: 16–33.
  • Ozga J. Busher H., Saran R. Deskilling a profession: professionalism, deprofessionalisation and the new managerialism. Managing Teachers as Professionals in Schools. 1995; London: Kogan Page. 21–37.
  • Ozga J. Policy research in educational settings: contested terrain. 2000; Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
  • Power M. The audit society: rituals of verification. 1997; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Power M. 2013. Organizations and audit trails. Paper presented at the Swedish Evaluation Society (SVUF) conference in Stockholm, 13–15 November 2013.
  • Polanyi M. The tacit dimension. 1966; New York: Doubleday.
  • Rönnberg L., Lindgren J., Segerholm C. In the public eye: inspection and local newspapers: exploring the audit–media relationship. Journal of Education Policy. 2013; 28(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 178–197.
  • SFS 2010:800. Skollag. Stockholm: Skolverket. [Education Act. In Swedish.].
  • Skolinspektionen. 2016. http://skolinspektionen.se/sv/Statistik/Statistik-om-anmalningar/anmalningar-och-beslut-2015/ [Statistics of complaints and decisions 2015. In Swedish]. (Accessed 2016-02-19).
  • Solbrekke T. D., Englund T. Bringing professional responsibility back in. Studies in Higher Education. 2011; 36(7Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 847–861.
  • Svensson L. G., Evetts J. Sociology of professions: continental and Anglo-Saxon traditions. 2010; Gothenburg, Sweden: Daidalos.
  • Troman G. Teacher stress in the low-trust society. British Journal of Sociology of Education. 2000; 21(3Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 321–353.
  • Vedung E. Utvärdering i politik och förvaltning [Evaluation in politics and administration] . 1998; Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratu.