Indications for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and survival in old adults

References

• Volkert D, Berner YN, Berry E, Cederholm T, Coti Bertrand P, Milne Aet al.ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition: geriatrics. 2006; 25330-60. 10.3402/fnr.v55i0.6037
   Google Scholar
• Norton B, Homer-Ward M, Donnelly MT, Holmes GKT. A randomised prospective comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nasogastric tube feeding after acute dysphagic stroke. 1996; 31213-16
   Google Scholar
• Gauderer MWL, Ponsky JL, Izant RJ. Gastrostomy without laparotomy; a percutaneous endoscopic technique. 1980; 15872-5. 10.3402/fnr.v55i0.6037
   Google Scholar
• Skelly RH, Kupfer RM, Metcalfe ME, Allison SP, Holt M, Hull MAet al.Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): change in practice since 1988. 2002; 21389-94. 10.3402/fnr.v55i0.6037
   Google Scholar
• Callahan CM, Haag KM, Weinberger M, Tierney WM, Buchanan NN, Stump TEet al.Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy among older adults in a community setting. 2000; 481048-54
   Google Scholar
• Fisman DN, Levy AR, Gifford DR, Tamblyn R. Survival after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy among older residents of Quebec. 1999; 47349-53
   Google Scholar
• Abuksis G, Mor M, Segal N, Shemesh I, Plout S, Sulkes Jet al.Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: high mortality rates in hospitalized patients. 2000; 95128-32. 10.3402/fnr.v55i0.6037
   Google Scholar
• Ha L, Hauge T. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) for enteral nutrition in patients with stroke. 2003; 9962-6
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell SL, Tetroe JM. Survival after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement in older persons. 2000; 55M735-M739. 10.3402/fnr.v55i0.6037
   Google Scholar
• Blomberg J,Lagergren P,Martin L,Mattsson F,Lagergren J. Albumin and C-reactive protein levels predict short-term mortality after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in a prospective cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc 2010 Nov 11. 10.3402/fnr.v55i0.6037
   Google Scholar
• Sanders DS, Carter MJ, D'Silva JD, James G, Bolton RP, Bardhan KD. Survival analysis in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding: a worse outcome in patients with dementia. 2000; 951472-5. 10.3402/fnr.v55i0.6037
   Google Scholar
• James A, Kapur K, Hawthorne AB. Long-term outcome of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding in patients with dysphagic stroke. 1998; 27671-6. 10.3402/fnr.v55i0.6037
   Google Scholar
• FOOD Trial Collaboration. Effect of timing and method of enteral tube feeding for dysphagic stroke patients (FOOD): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. 2005; 365: 764–72.
   Google Scholar
• Smithard DG, O'Neill PA, England RE, Park CL, Wyatt R, Martin DFet al.The natural history of dysphagia following a stroke. 1997; 12188-93. 10.3402/fnr.v55i0.6037
   Google Scholar
• Gordon C, Hewer RL, Wade DT. Dysphagia in acute stroke. 1985; 295411-14
   Google Scholar
• Van Rosendaal GMA, Verhoef MJ, Kinsella TD. How are decisions made about the use of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for long-term nutritional support?. 1999; 943225-8. 10.3402/fnr.v55i0.6037
   Google Scholar
• Nair S, Hertan H, Pitchumoni CS. Hypoalbuminemia is a poor predictor of survival after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in elderly patients with dementia. 2000; 95133-6. 10.3402/fnr.v55i0.6037
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell SL, Kiely DK, Lipsitz LA. The risk factors and impact of survival of feeding tube placement in nursing home residents with severe cognitive impairment. 1997; 157327-32. 10.3402/fnr.v55i0.6037
   Google Scholar
• Murphy LM, Lipman TO. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy does not prolong survival in patients with dementia. 2003; 1631351-3. 10.3402/fnr.v55i0.6037
   Google Scholar
• Dharmarajan TS, Unnikrishnan D, Pitchumoni CS. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and outcome in dementia. 2001; 962556-63. 10.3402/fnr.v55i0.6037
   Google Scholar
• Sampson EL, Candy B, Jones L. Enteral tube feeding for older people with advanced dementia. 2009; Apr 152: D007209.
   Google Scholar
• Körner U, Bondolfi A, Bühler E, MacFie J, Meguid MM, Messing Bet al.Ethical and legal aspects of enteral nutrition. ESPEN guidelines. 2006; 25196-202. 10.3402/fnr.v55i0.6037
   Google Scholar
• Gillick MR. Rethinking the role of tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia. 2000; 342206-10. 10.3402/fnr.v55i0.6037
   Google Scholar
• Cortez-Pinto H, Correia AP, Camilo ME, Tavares L, De Moura MC. Long-term management of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy by a nutritional support team. 2002; 227-31. 10.3402/fnr.v55i0.6037
   Google Scholar
• Chiò A, Finocchiaro E, Meineri P, Bottacchi E, Schiffer D. Safety and factors related to survival after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in ALS. ALS Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Study Group. 1999; 531123-5
   Google Scholar
• Paillaud E,Bories PN,Merlier I,Richardet JP,Jeanfaivre V,Campillo B. Facteurs pronostiques de la survie à court et long terme après pose d'une gastrostomie percutanée endoscopique chez des malades âgés hospitalisés (full text in English on http://www.e2med.com/gcb). 2002; 26: 443–7.
   Google Scholar
• Kaw M, Sekas G. Long-term follow-up of consequences of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes in nursing home patients. 1994; 39738-43. 10.3402/fnr.v55i0.6037
   Google Scholar
• Weaver JP, Odell P, Nelson C. Evaluation of the benefits of gastric tube feeding in an elderly population. 1993; 2953-6. 10.3402/fnr.v55i0.6037
   Google Scholar
• Raha SK, Woodhouse K. The use of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in 161 consecutive elderly patients. 1994; 23162-3. 10.3402/fnr.v55i0.6037
   Google Scholar
• Löser C, Wolters S, Fölsch UR. Enteral long-term nutrition via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in 210 patients. 1998; 432549-57. 10.3402/fnr.v55i0.6037
   Google Scholar