906
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Predictors of adherence to screening guidelines for chronic diseases of lifestyle, cancers, and HIV in a health-insured population in South Africa

, &
Article: 23807 | Received 12 Jan 2014, Accepted 22 Feb 2014, Published online: 14 Mar 2014

References

  • Zapka JG, Lemon SC. Interventions for patients, providers, and health care organizations. Cancer. 2004; 101(5 Suppl): 1165–87.
  • Lopez-de-Andre A, Martin-Lopez R, Hernandez-Barrera V, Garrido-Carrasco P, Gil-de-Miguel A, Esteban y Pena MM, etal. Predictors of breast and cervical cancer screening in a Spanish metropolitan area. J Womens Health. 2010; 19: 1675–1681
  • Rigal L, Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Falcoff H, Bouyer J, Ringa V. Do social inequalities in cervical cancer screening persist among patients who use primary care? The Paris Prevention in General Practice survey. Prev Med. 2001; 53: 199–202.
  • Bang JY, Yadegarfar G, Soljak M, Majeed A. Primary care factors associated with cervical screening coverage in England. J Public Health. 2012; 34: 532–8.
  • Akinyemiju TF, Soliman AS, Yassine M, Banerjee M, Schwartz K, Merajver S. Healthcare access and mammography screening in Michigan: a multilevel cross-sectional study. Int J Equity Health. 2012; 11: 16.
  • Zhao D, Zhang Z, Rao K. Health insurance and household Income associated with mammography utilization among American women, 2000–2008. Chin Med J. 2011; 124: 3320–6.
  • Dimitrakaki C, Boulamatsis D, Mariolis A, Kontodimopoulos N, Niakas D, Tountas Y. Use of cancer screening services in Greece and associated social factors: results from the nation-wide Hellas Health I survey. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2009; 18: 248–57.
  • Wilf-Miron R, Peled R, Yaari E, Vainer A, Porath A, Kokia E. The association between sociodemographic characteristics and adherence to breast and colorectal cancer screening: analysis of large sub populations. BMC Cancer. 2011; 11: 376.
  • Adonis L, An R, Luiz J, Mehrotra A, Patel D, Basu D, etal. Provincial screening rates for chronic diseases of lifestyle, cancers and HIV in a health-insured population. S Afr Med J. 2013; 103: 309–12.
  • Long JA, Chang VW, Ibrahim SA, Asch DA. Update on the health disparities literature. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 141: 805–12.
  • Biesheuvel C, Weigela S, Heindela C. Mammography screening: evidence, history and current practice in Germany and other European countries. Breast Care. 2011; 6: 104–9.
  • Chu LL, Weinstein S, Yee J. Colorectal cancer screening in women: an underutilized lifesaver. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001; 196: 303–10.
  • Sabatino SA, Habarta N, Baron RC, Coates RJ, Rimer BK, Kerner J, etal. Interventions to increase recommendation and delivery of screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers by healthcare providers. Systematic reviews of provider assessment and feedback and provider incentives. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 35(1 Suppl): S67–74.
  • Weller DP, Patnick J, McIntosh HM, Dietrich AJ. Uptake in cancer screening programmes. Lancet Oncol. 2009; 10: 693–9.
  • Damiani G, Federico B, Basso D, Ronconi A, Bianchi CB, Anzelotti GM, etal. Socioeconomic disparities in the uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening in Italy: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12: 99.
  • Garrido-Cumbrera M, Borrell C, Palència L, Espelt A, Rodriguez-Sanz M, Pasarin MI, etal. Social class inequalities in the utilization of health care and preventive services in Spain: a country with a national health system. Int J Health Serv. 2010; 40: 525–42.
  • Olesen SC, Butterworth P, Jacomb P, Tait RJ. Personal factors influence use of cervical cancer screening services: epidemiological survey and linked administrative data address the limitations of previous research. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012; 12: 34.
  • Lofters AK, Moineddin R, Hwang SW, Glazier RH. Predictors of low cervical cancer screening among immigrant women in Ontario, Canada. BMC Women's Health. 2011; 211: 20.
  • Elit L, Krzyzanowska M, Saskin R, Barbera L, Razzaq A, Lofters A, etal. Sociodemographic factors associated with cervical cancer screening and follow-up of abnormal results. Can Fam Physician. 2012; 58: e22–31.
  • Dailey AB, Kasl SV, Holford TR, Calvocoressi L, Jones BA. Neighborhood-level plan predictors of non-adherence to mammography screening guidelines. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007; 16: 2293–303.
  • Bosch A, Rossouw J, Claassens T, du Plessis B. A second look at measuring inequality in South Africa: a modified Gini coefficient. 2010. School of Development Studies Working Paper No; Available from: http://www.sds.ukzn.ac.za/files/WP%2058%20web.pdf [cited 11 November 2012]..
  • Ataguba JE, Akazili J, McIntyre D. Socioeconomic-related health inequality in South Africa: evidence from general household surveys. Int J Equity Health. 2010; 10: 48.
  • Coovadia H, Jewkes R, Barron P, Sanders D, McIntyre D. The health and health system of South Africa: historical roots of current public health challenges. Lancet. 2009; 374: 817–34.
  • National Department of Health. National guidelines for cervical cancer screening programme. 2000; Pretoria: Department of Health.
  • Moodley J, Kawonga M, Bradley J, Hoffman M. Challenges in implementing a cervical screening program in South Africa. Cancer Detect Prev. 2006; 30: 361–8.
  • Mobley LR, Kuo TM, Clayton LJ, Evans WD. Mammography facilities are accessible, so why is utilization so low?. Canc Causes Contr. 2009; 20: 1017–28.
  • DuBard CA, Schmid D, Yow A, Rogers AB, Lawrence WW. Recommendation for and receipt of cancer screenings among Medicaid recipients 50 years and older. Arch Intern Med. 2008; 168: 2014–21.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Use of selected clinical preventive services among adults—United States, 2007–2010. MMWR. 2012; 61
  • Volpp KG, Gurmankin Levy A, Asch DA, Berlin JA, Murphy JJ, Gomez A, etal. A randomized controlled trial of financial incentives for smoking cessation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006; 15: 12–18.
  • Fernald LCH, Hou X, Gertler PJ. Oportunidades program participation and body mass index, blood pressure, and self reported health in Mexican adults. Prev Chronic Dis. 2008; 5: 1–12
  • Voigt K. Incentives, health promotion and equality: health economics, policy and law. 2010; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Stone EG, Morton SC, Hulscher MC, Maglione MA, Roth EA, Grimshaw JM, etal. Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 136: 641–51.
  • Kane RL, Johnson PE, Town RJ, Butler M. Economic incentives for preventive care. 2012; Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
  • Ortiz AP, Hebl S, Serrano R, Fernandez ME, Suárez E, Tortolero-Luna G. Factors associated with cervical cancer screening in Puerto Rico. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010; 7: 1–10
  • Richardson H, Aronson KJ, James A, McGregor SE, Bryant H. Factors related to use of prostate cancer screening: the Alberta Tomorrow Project. Open Med. 2007; 1: e3–e12.
  • Schumacher MC, Slattery ML, Lanier AP, Ma K, Edwards S, Ferucci ED, etal. Prevalence and predictors of cancer screening among American Indian and Alaska native people: the EARTH study. Canc Causes Contr. 2008; 19: 725–37.
  • South African National Cancer Registry. 2004. Available from: http://www.cansa.org.za/files/2012/05/Cancer_Registry_2004.pdf [cited 12 January 2012]..
  • Robertson LM, Douglas F, Ludbrook A, Reid G, van Teijlingen E. What works with men? A systematic review of health promoting interventions targeting men. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008; 8: 141.
  • Bradshaw D, Laubscher NNR, Groenewald P, Joubert J, Nojilana B, Norman R, etal. South African National Burden of Diseases Study 2000. Estimates of Provincial Mortality. Summary Report. 2006. Pretoria, South Africa: Burden of Disease Research Unit, Medical Research Council of South Africa.
  • Holden DJ, Jonas DE, Porterfield DS, Reuland D, Harris R. Systematic review: enhancing the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 152: 668–76.
  • Chou R, Croswell JM, Dana T, Bougatsos C, Blazina I, Fu R, etal. Screening for prostate cancer: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155: 762–71.
  • U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. 2008; Screening for lipid disordersin adults: U.S. Available from: http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf08/lipid/lipidrs.htm [cited 16 April 2013] .
  • Norris SL, Kansagara D, Bougatsos C, Fu R. Screening adults for type 2 diabetes: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008; 148: 855–68.
  • Nelson HD, Haney EM, Dana T, Bougatsos C, Chou R. Screening for osteoporosis: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 153: 356–364