Health workers’ knowledge of and attitudes towards computer applications in rural African health facilities

References

• Bates DW, Gawande AA. Improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 2526–34.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E, etal. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 2006; 144: 742–52.
   Google Scholar
• Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. Brit Med J. 2005; 330: 765.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasi E, Facchini LA, Maia MF. Health information technology in primary health care in developing countries: a literature review. Bull World Health Organ. 2004; 82: 867–74. [PubMed Abstract] [PubMed CentralFull Text].
   Google Scholar
• Bates DW, Cohen M, Leape LL, Overhage JM, Shabot MM, Sheridan T. Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001; 8: 299–308.
   Google Scholar
• Bright TJ, Wong A, Dhurjati R, Bristow E, Bastian L, Coeytaux RR, etal. Effect of clinical decision-support systems: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2012; 157: 29–43.
   Google Scholar
• Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, Rosas-Arellano MP, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J, etal. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Am Med Assoc. 2005; 293: 1223–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163: 1409–16.
   Google Scholar
• Asah F. Computer usage among nurses in rural health-care facilities in South Africa: obstacles and challenges. J Nurs Manag. 2011; 21: 499–510.
   Google Scholar
• Peters DH, Kohli M, Mascarenhas M, Rao K. Can computers improve patient care by primary health care workers in India?. Int J Qual Health Care. 2006; 18: 437–45.
   Google Scholar
• Huryk LA. Factors influencing nurses’ attitudes towards healthcare information technology. J Nurs Manag. 2010; 18: 606–12.
   Google Scholar
• Ruxwana NL, Herselman ME, Conradie DP. ICT applications as e-health solutions in rural healthcare in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Health Inf Manag. 2010; 39: 17–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stronge JH, Brodt A. Assessment of nurses’ attitudes toward computerization. Comput Nurs. 1985; 3: 154–8. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Trivedi MH, Kern JK, Marcee A, Grannemann B, Kleiber B, Bettinger T, etal. Development and implementation of computerized clinical guidelines: barriers and solutions. Methods Inf Med. 2002; 41: 435–42. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Raja EE, Mahal R, Masih VB. An exploratory study to assess the computer knowledge, attitude and skill among nurses in health care setting of a selected hospital in Ludhiana, Punjab, India. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004; 107: 1304–7. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Sicotte C, Pare G, Moreault MP, Lemay A, Valiquette L, Barkun J. Replacing an inpatient electronic medical record. Lessons learned from user satisfaction with the former system. Methods Inf Med. 2009; 48: 92–100. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Kamadjeu RM, Tapang EM, Moluh RN. Designing and implementing an electronic health record system in primary care practice in sub-Saharan Africa: a case study from Cameroon. Inform Prim Care. 2005; 13: 179–86. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Moody LE, Slocumb E, Berg B, Jackson D. Electronic health records documentation in nursing: nurses’ perceptions, attitudes, and preferences. Comput Inform Nurs. 2004; 22: 337–44.
   Google Scholar
• Trivedi MH, Daly EJ, Kern JK, Grannemann BD, Sunderajan P, Claassen CA. Barriers to implementation of a computerized decision support system for depression: an observational report on lessons learned in “real world” clinical settings. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009; 9: 6.
   Google Scholar
• Brumini G, Kovic I, Zombori D, Lulic I, Petrovecki M. Nurses’ attitudes towards computers: cross sectional questionnaire study. Croat Med J. 2005; 46: 101–4. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Littlejohns P, Wyatt JC, Garvican L. Evaluating computerised health information systems: hard lessons still to be learnt. Brit Med J. 2003; 326: 860–3.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford GD, Blaya JA, Hall-Clifford R, Fraser HS. Medical information systems: a foundation for healthcare technologies in developing countries. Biomed Eng Online. 2008; 7: 18.
   Google Scholar
• Courtney KL, Alexander GL, Demiris G. Information technology from novice to expert: implementation implications. J Nurs Manag. 2008; 16: 692–9.
   Google Scholar
• Moxey A, Robertson J, Newby D, Hains I, Williamson M, Pearson SA. Computerized clinical decision support for prescribing: provision does not guarantee uptake. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010; 17: 25–33.
   Google Scholar
• Toth-Pal E, Wardh I, Strender LE, Nilsson G. Implementing a clinical decision-support system in practice: a qualitative analysis of influencing attitudes and characteristics among general practitioners. Inform Health Soc Care. 2008; 33: 39–54.
   Google Scholar
• Ward R, Stevens C, Brentnall P, Briddon J. The attitudes of health care staff to information technology: a comprehensive review of the research literature. Health Info Libr J. 2008; 25: 81–97.
   Google Scholar
• Omary Z, Lupiana D, Mtenzi F, Wu B. Analysis of the challenges affecting e-healthcare adoption in developing countries: a case of Tanzania. Int J Inf Stud. 2010; 2: 38–50.
   Google Scholar
• Ouma S, Herselman ME. E-health in rural areas: case of developing countries. Int J Biol Life Sci. 2008; 4: 194–200.
   Google Scholar
• Blank A, Prytherch H, Kaltschmidt J, Krings A, Sukums F, Mensah N, etal. “Quality of prenatal and maternal care: bridging the know-do gap” (QUALMAT study): an electronic clinical decision support system for rural Sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013; 13: 44.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas GP, Gadabu OJ, Joukes S, Mumba S, McKay MV, Ben-Smith A, etal. Using touchscreen electronic medical record systems to support and monitor national scale-up of antiretroviral therapy in Malawi. PLoS Med. 2010; 7: e1000319.
   Google Scholar
• Alquraini H, Alhashem AM, Shah MA, Chowdhury RI. Factors influencing nurses’ attitudes towards the use of computerized health information systems in Kuwaiti hospitals. J Adv Nurs. 2007; 57: 375–81.
   Google Scholar
• Boonstra A, Broekhuis M. Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010; 10: 231.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammed E, Andargie G, Meseret S, Girma E. Knowledge and utilization of computer among health workers in Addis Ababa hospitals, Ethiopia: computer literacy in the health sector. BMC Res Notes. 2013; 6: 106.
   Google Scholar
• Sauerborn R. Health care intervention research – improving pre-natal and maternal care; EU funded project: HEALTH-2007-3.5-4. Grant agreement 22982. 2009. Submitted to the European Union Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Kaya N. Factors affecting nurses’ attitudes toward computers in healthcare. Comput Inform Nurs. 2011; 29: 121–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kivuti-Bitok LW. What do nurse managers want computerized? Needs based assessment study of middle and functional level nurse managers at Kenyatta National Hospital, Kenya. J Health Inform Dev Ctries. 2009; 3: 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Clissett P. Evaluating qualitative research. J Ort Nurs. 2008; 12: 99–105.
   Google Scholar
• Fossum M, Ehnfors M, Fruhling A, Ehrenberg A. An evaluation of the usability of a computerized decision support system for nursing homes. Appl Clin Inform. 2011; 2: 420–36.
   Google Scholar
• Bello IS, Arogundade FA, Sanusi AA, Ezeoma IT, Abioye-Kuteyi EA, Akinsola A. Knowledge and utilization of information technology among health care professionals and students in Ile-Ife, Nigeria: a case study of a university teaching hospital. J Med Internet Res. 2004; 6: e45.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell M, Lesh N, Cranmer H, Fraser H, Haivas I, Wolf K. Improving care – improving access: the use of electronic decision support with AIDS patients in South Africa. Int J Healthc Tech Manag. 2009; 10: 156–68.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis E, Hicks P, Redmond R. Nursing students experience and attitudes to computers: a survey of a cohort of students on a Bachelor in Nursing Studies course. Inform Technol Nurs. 2002; 14: 7–17.
   Google Scholar
• Son J-B, Robb T, Charismiadji I. Computer literacy and competency: a survey of Indonesian teachers of English as a foreign language. CALL-EJ. 2011; 12: 26–42.
   Google Scholar
• Oluoch T, Santas X, Kwaro D, Were M, Biondich P, Bailey C, etal. The effect of electronic medical record-based clinical decision support on HIV care in resource-constrained settings: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2012; 81: e83–92.
   Google Scholar
• Ammenwerth E, Mansmann U, Iller C, Eichstadter R. Factors affecting and affected by user acceptance of computer-based nursing documentation: results of a two-year study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003; 10: 69–84.
   Google Scholar
• Murff HJ, Kannry J. Physician satisfaction with two order entry systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001; 8: 499–509.
   Google Scholar