Does the Janani Suraksha Yojana cash transfer programme to promote facility births in India ensure skilled birth attendance? A qualitative study of intrapartum care in Madhya Pradesh

References

• Tuncalp O, Were WM, MacLennan C, Oladapo OT, Gulmezoglu AM, Rahl R, etal. Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns – the WHO vision. BJOG. 2015; 122(8): 1045–9. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Registrar General of India. Special bulletin of maternal mortality in India 2010–12. 2013; New Delhi: Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Janani Suraksha Yojana: revised guidelines for implementation 2006. 2006; New Delhi: Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• Lim SS, Dandona L, Hoisington JA, James SL, Hogan MC, Gakidou E. India’s Janani Suraksha Yojana, a conditional cash transfer programme to increase births in health facilities: an impact evaluation. Lancet. 2010; 375: 2009–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randive B, Diwan V, De Costa A. India’s conditional cash transfer program (the JSY) to promote institutional birth: is there an association between institutional birth proportion and maternal mortality?. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e67452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. Making pregnancy safer: the critical role of the skilled attendant: a joint statement by WHO, ICM and FIGO. 2004; Geneva: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Statistics Division. Rural Health Statistics in India 2011. Available from: https://nrhm-mis.nic.in/UI/RHS/RHS 2011/RHS -March 2011- Tables- Final 9.4.2012.pdf [cited 2 May 2014].
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Care in normal birth: a practical guide/report of a technical working group. 1996; Geneva: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Skilled birth attendance-a handbook for auxiliary nurse midwives/lady health visitors and staff nurses 2010. 2010; New Delhi: Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res. 1999; 34: 1189–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie J, Spencer L, O’Connor W.Ritchie J, Lewis J. Carrying out qualitative analysis. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. 2003; London: Sage. 219–62.
   Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi S, Upadhyay S, De Costa A. Competence of nurse birth attendants in India’s JSY conditional cash transfer program to promote institutional births: an assessment using case vignettes in Madhya Pradesh province. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14: 174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam MT, Haque YA, Waxman R, Bhuiyan AB. Implementation of emergency obstetric care training in Bangladesh: lessons learned. Reprod Health Matters. 2006; 14: 61–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koblinsky M, Matthews Z, Hussein J, Mavalankar D, Mridha MK, Anwar I, etal. Going to scale with professional skilled care. Lancet. 2006; 368: 1377–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham WJ, Bell JS, Bullough CH.De Brouwere V, Van Lerberghe W. Can skilled attendance at delivery reduce maternal mortality in developing countries?. Safe motherhood strategies: a review of the evidence; Studies in Health Services Organisation and Policy, No. 17. 2001; Antwerp: ITG Press. 97–130.
   Google Scholar
• Miller S, Cordero M, Coleman AL, Figueroa S, Brito-Anderson S, Dabagh R, etal. Quality of care in institutionalized deliveries: the paradox of the Dominican Republic. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003; 82: 89–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delvaux T, Aké-Tano O, Gohou-Kouassi V, Bosso P, Collin S, Ronsmans S. Quality of normaldelivery care in Cote d’Ivoire. Afr J Repro Health. 2007; 11: 22–32.
   Google Scholar
• Duysburg E. Quality of antenatal and childbirth care in selected rural health facilities in Burkina Faso, Ghana and Tanzania. Trop Med Int Health. 2013; 18: 34–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil K. Routines in facility based delivery care: evidence from Arabic region. BJOG. 2005; 112: 1270–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pathmanathan I, Liljestrand J, Martins J, Rajapaksa L, Lissner C, De Silva A, etal. Investing in maternal health: learning from Malaysia and Sri Lanka. Health, Nutrition and Population Series. 2003; Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Souza JP, Tunçalp Ö, Vogel JP, Bohren M, Widmer M, Oladapo OT, etal. Obstetric transition: the pathway towards ending preventable maternal deaths. BJOG. 2014; 121(Suppl 1): 1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowser D, Hill K. Exploring evidence for disrespect and abuse in facility-based childbirth. 2010. Boston: USAID-TRAction Project, Harvard School of Public Health.
   Google Scholar
• International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Macro International. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–06: India, Volume I. 2007; Mumbai: International Institute of Population Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Mumtaz ZA, Levay A, Bhatti S, Salway S. Good on paper: the gap between programme theory and real-world context in Pakistan’s Community Midwife programme. BJOG. 2015; 122: 249–58. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon SA, George AS, Chabet JJ, Mosha IH, Mpembemi RNM, Witch PJ. Experiences of and responses to disrespectful maternity care and abuse during childbirth; a qualitative study with women and men in Morogoro Region, Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14: 268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulton LA, Matthews Z, Stone RW. A framework for the evaluation of quality of care in maternity services. 2000; Southampton: University of Southampton.
   Google Scholar
• Donnabedian A. Quality assurance in health care: consumers’ role. Quality Health Care. 1992; 1: 47–51.
   Google Scholar
• Mumtaz Z, Salway S, Bhatti A, McIntyre L. Addressing invisibility, inferiority, and powerlessness to achieve gains in maternal health for ultra-poor women. Lancet. 2014; 383: 1095–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber SL, Gertler PJ. Empowering women: how Mexico’s conditional cash transfer programme raised prenatal care quality and birth weight. J Dev Effect. 2010; 2: 51–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair M, Yoshida S, Lambrechts T, Boshi-Pinto C, Bose K, Mary Mason E, Mathai M. Facilitators and barriers to quality of care in maternal, newborn and child health: a global situation analysis through Meta review. BMJ. 2014; 4e: 004749.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth: WHO statement. 2014. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/134588 [cited 16 January 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch. No tally of the anguish: accountability in maternal health care in India. 2009; New York: Human Rights Watch.
   Google Scholar
• Raven J, Hofman J, Adegoke A, van den Broek N. Methodology and tools for quality improvement in maternal and newborn health care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011; 114: 4–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe AK, de Savigny D, Lanata CF, Victora CG. How can we achieve and maintain high-quality performance of health workers in low-resource settings?. Lancet. 2005; 366: 1026–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaarder MM, Glassman A, Todd JE. Conditional cash transfers and health: unpacking the causal chain. J Dev Effect. 2010; 2: 6–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group. Available from: http://pregnancy.cochrane.org/our-reviews [cited 16 January 2015].
   Google Scholar