The importance of considering the evidence in the MTP 2014 Amendment debate in India – unsubstantiated arguments should not impede improved access to safe abortion

References

• Sample Registration System. Maternal mortality in India: 1997–2003 – trends, causes and risk factors. 2006; New Delhi: SRS.
   Google Scholar
• Parliament of the Republic of India. The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, Act No. 34 of 1971, as amended by Act No. 64 of 2002. 2002; New Delhi: Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• Stillman M, Frost JJ, Singh S, Moore AM, Kalyanwala S. Abortion in India: a literature review. 2014; New York: Guttmacher Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Pal S. Gynaecologists divided over govt's proposed changes to abortion law. 2014; DNA. November 11: 1. Available from: http://epaper.dnaindia.com/story.aspx?edorsup=Sup&queryed=820009&ed_page=5&boxid=31897&id=72795&eddate=2014-11-11&ed_date=2014-11-11&ed_code=820009&wintype=popup [cited 11 November 2014]..
   Google Scholar
• Pal S. Doctors slam government's proposal to allow midwives, homeopaths to conduct abortion. 2014; DNA. November 8: 1. Available from: http://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/report-doctors-slam-government-s-proposal-to-allow-midwives-homeopaths-to-conduct-abortion-2033073 [cited 8 November 2014]..
   Google Scholar
• Facebook Group. Against MTP amendment 2014 (Facebook group). 2014; Facebook. Available from: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Against-MTP-amendment-2014/301783830032527 .
   Google Scholar
• PTI. IMA opposes government's proposed amendments to the MTP Act. 2014; The Economic Times. November 6: 1. Available from: http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-11-06/news/55835712_1_indian-medical-association-ima-members-20-weeks [cited 6 November 2014]..
   Google Scholar
• Dalai P. Should non-allopaths be allowed to conduct abortions?. 2014; Mid Day. November 16: 1. Available from: http://www.mid-day.com/articles/should-non-allopaths-be-allowed-to-conduct-abortions/15768190#sthash.hyQG2stO.dpuf [cited 16 November 2014]..
   Google Scholar
• Gemzell-Danielsson K, Kopp Kalnner H.Rowland S. Mid-level providers. Abortion care. 2014; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 219–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hirve SS. Abortion law, policy and services in India: a critical review. Reprod Health Matters. 2004; 12: 114–21.
   Google Scholar
• Jejeebhoy SJ, Kalyanwala S, Mundle S, Tank J, Zavier AJ, Kumar R, etal. Feasibility of expanding the medication abortion provider base in India to include ayurvedic physicians and nurses. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012; 38: 133–42.
   Google Scholar
• Patel L, Bennett TA, Halpern CT, Johnston HB, Suchindran CM. Support for provision of early medical abortion by mid-level providers in Bihar and Jharkhand, India. Reprod Health Matters. 2009; 17: 70–9.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöström S, Essén B, Sydén F, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Klingberg-Allvin M. Medical students’ attitudes and perceptions on abortion: a cross-sectional survey among medical interns in Maharashtra, India. Contraception. 2014; 90: 42–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jejeebhoy SJ, Kalyanwala S, Zavier AJ, Kumar R, Mundle S, Tank J, etal. Can nurses perform manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) as safely and effectively as physicians?. Evidence from India. Contraception. 2011; 84: 615–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar K, Iyengar SD. Elective abortion as a primary health service in rural India: experience with manual vacuum aspiration. Reprod Health Matters. 2002; 10: 54–63.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar SD. Introducing medical abortion within the primary health system: comparison with other health interventions and commodities. Reprod Health Matters. 2005; 13: 13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Berer M. Provision of abortion by mid-level providers: international policy, practice and perspectives. Bull World Health Organ. 2009; 87: 58–63.
   Google Scholar
• Ngo TD, Park MH, Free C. Safety and effectiveness of termination services performed by doctors versus midlevel providers: a systematic review and analysis. Int J Womens Health. 2013; 5: 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Warriner IK, Wang D, Huong NT, Thapa K, Tamang A, Shah I, etal. Can midlevel health-care providers administer early medical abortion as safely and effectively as doctors? A randomised controlled equivalence trial in Nepal. Lancet. 2011; 377: 1155–61.
   Google Scholar
• Warriner IK, Meirik O, Hoffman M, Morroni C, Harries J, My Huong NT, etal. Rates of complication in first-trimester manual vacuum aspiration abortion done by doctors and mid-level providers in South Africa and Vietnam: a randomised controlled equivalence trial. Lancet. 2006; 368: 1965–72.
   Google Scholar
• Chong Y-S, Mattar CN. Mid-level providers: a safe solution for unsafe abortion. Lancet. 2006; 368: 1939–40.
   Google Scholar
• Kopp Kallner H, Gomperts R, Salomonsson E, Johansson M, Marions L, Gemzell-Danielsson K. The efficacy, safety and acceptability of medical termination of pregnancy provided by standard care by doctors or by nurse–midwives: a randomised controlled equivalence trial. BJOG. 2015; 122: 510–17.
   Google Scholar
• Basnett I, Shrestha MK, Shah M, Pearson E, Thapa K, Andersen KL. Evaluation of nurse providers of comprehensive abortion care using MVA in Nepal. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2012; 10: 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Yarnall J, Swica Y, Winikoff B. Non-physician clinicians can safely provide first trimester medical abortion. Reprod Health Matters. 2009; 17: 61–9.
   Google Scholar
• Puri M, Regmi S, Tamang A, Shrestha P. Road map to scaling-up: translating operations research study's results into actions for expanding medical abortion services in rural health facilities in Nepal. Health Res Policy Syst. 2014; 12: 24.
   Google Scholar
• Renner R, Brahmi D, Kapp N. Who can provide effective and safe termination of pregnancy care? A systematic review*. BJOG. 2013; 120: 23–31.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organizaton. Clinical practice handbook for safe abortion. 2014; Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Grimes DA, Benson J, Singh S, Romero M, Ganatra B, Okonofua FE, etal. Unsafe abortion: the preventable pandemic. Lancet. 2006; 368: 1908–19.
   Google Scholar
• Gomperts R, van der Vleuten K, Jelinska K, da Costa CV, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Kleiverda G. Provision of medical abortion using telemedicine in Brazil. Contraception. 2014; 89: 129–33.
   Google Scholar
• Gomperts R, Petow SA, Jelinska K, Steen L, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Kleiverda G. Regional differences in surgical intervention following medical termination of pregnancy provided by telemedicine. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012; 91: 226–31.
   Google Scholar
• Kopp Kallner H, Fiala C, Stephansson O, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Home self-administration of vaginal misoprostol for medical abortion at 50–63 days compared with gestation of below 50 days. Hum Reprod. 2010; 25: 1153–7.
   Google Scholar
• Karki C, Pokharel H, Kushwaha A, Manandhar D, Bracken H, Winikoff B. Acceptability and feasibility of medical abortion in Nepal. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009; 106: 39–42.
   Google Scholar
• Oppegaard KS, Qvigstad E, Fiala C, Heikinheimo O, Benson L, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Clinical follow-up compared with self-assessment of outcome after medical abortion: a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2014; 6736: 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar K, Paul M, Iyengar SD, Klingberg-Allvin M, Essén B, Bring J, etal. Can women themselves assess the outcome of an early medical abortion as effectively as a clinic follow-up visit? A randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial in India. Lancet Glob. Heal. in press
   Google Scholar
• Paul M, Iyengar K, Iyengar S, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Essén B, Klingberg-Allvin M. Simplified follow-up after medical abortion using a low-sensitivity urinary pregnancy test and a pictorial instruction sheet in Rajasthan, India – study protocol and intervention adaptation of a randomised control trial. BMC Womens Health. 2014; 14: 98.
   Google Scholar