2,975
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Issue: Gender and Health Inequality - intersections with other relevant axes of oppression

Access to rehabilitation: patient perceptions of inequalities in access to specialty pain rehabilitation from a gender and intersectional perspective

, , , &
Article: 31542 | Received 07 Mar 2016, Accepted 15 Jul 2016, Published online: 26 Aug 2016

References

  • Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006; 10: 287–333.
  • Nordin C, Fjellman-Wiklund A, Gard G. In search of recognition – patients’ experiences of patient participation prior to multimodal pain rehabilitation. Eur J Physiother. 2014; 16: 49–57.
  • Merrick D, Sundelin G, Stålnacke BM. One-year follow-up of two different rehabilitation strategies for patients with chronic pain. J Rehabil Med. 2012; 44: 764–73.
  • de Heer EW, Gerrits MMJG, Beekman ATF, Dekker J, van Marwijk HWJ, de Waal MWM, etal. The association of depression and anxiety with pain: a study from NESDA. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e106907.
  • Bair MJ, Robinson RL, Katon W, Kroenke K. Depression and pain comorbidity: a literature review. Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163: 2433–45.
  • Börsbo B, Gerdle B, Peolsson M. Impact of the interaction between self-efficacy, symptoms and catastrophising on disability, quality of life and health in with chronic pain patients. Disabil Rehabil. 2010; 32: 1387–96.
  • Werner A, Malterud K. It is hard work behaving as a credible patient: encounters between women with chronic pain and their doctors. Soc Sci Med. 2003; 57: 1409–19.
  • Hankivsky O. Women's health, men's health, and gender and health: implications of intersectionality. Soc Sci Med. 2012; 74: 1712–20.
  • Album D, Westin S. Do diseases have a prestige hierarchy? A survey among physicians and medical students. Soc Sci Med. 2008; 66: 182–8.
  • Grue J, Johannessen LEF, Rasmussen EF. Prestige rankings of chronic diseases and disabilities. A survey among professionals in the disability field. Soc Sci Med. 2015; 124: 180–6.
  • Holloway I, Sofaer-Bennett B, Walker J. The stigmatisation of people with chronic back pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2007; 29: 1456–64.
  • Gustafsson M, Ekholm J, Öhman A. From shame to respect: musculoskeletal pain patients’ experience of a rehabilitation programme, a qualitative study. J Rehabil Med. 2004; 36: 97–103.
  • Nettleton S. ‘I just want permission to be ill’: towards a sociology of medically unexplained symptoms. Soc Sci Med. 2006; 62: 1167–78.
  • Scascighini L, Toma V, Dober-Spielmann S, Sprott H. Multidisciplinary treatment for chronic pain: a systematic review of interventions and outcomes. Rheumatology. 2008; 47: 670–8.
  • Hasselström J, Liu-Palmgren J, Rasjö-Wrååk G. Prevalence of pain in general practice. Eur J Pain. 2002; 6: 375–85.
  • SBU 2010. Chronic pain rehabilitation. Stockholm: Swedish Council of Health Technology Assessment..
  • Hamberg K, Risberg G, Johansson EE, Westman G. Gender bias in physicians’ management of neck pain: a study of the answers in a Swedish national examination. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2002; 11: 653–66.
  • Raine R. Does gender bias exist in the use of specialist health care?. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000; 5: 237–49.
  • Hammarström A, Haukenes I, Fjellman Wiklund A, Lehti A, Wiklund M, Evengård B, etal. Low-educated women with chronic pain were less often selected to multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e97134.
  • Stålnacke B, Haukenes I, Lehti A, Fjellman Wiklund A, Wiklund M, Hammarström A. Is there a gender bias in the recommendations for further rehabilitation in primary care of patients with chronic pain after an interdisciplinary team assessment?. J Rehabil Med. 2015; 47: 365–71.
  • Noone JH, Stephens C. Men, masculine identities, and health care utilisation. Sociol Health Illn. 2008; 30: 711–25.
  • Ruiz-Cantero MT, Vives-Cases C, Artazcoz L, Delgado A, García Calvente MM, Miqueo C, etal. A framework to analyse gender bias in epidemiological research. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007; 61(Suppl 2): 46–53.
  • Bosner S, Haasenritter J, Hani M, Keller H, Sonnichsen A, Karatolios K, etal. Gender bias revisited: new insights on the differential management of chest pain. BMC Fam Pract. 2011; 12: 45.
  • Hallett K. Intersectionality and serious mental illness – a case study and recommendations for practice. Women Ther. 2015; 38: 156–74.
  • Hammarström A, Johansson K, Annandale E, Ahlgren C, Aléx L, Christianson M, etal. Central gender theoretical concepts in health research: the state of the art. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014; 68: 185–90.
  • Muenzenmaier K, Margolis F, Langdon GS, Rhodes D, Kobayashi T, Rifkin L. Transcending bias in diagnosis and treatment for women with serious mental illness. Women Ther. 2015; 38: 141–55.
  • Connell R. Gender, health and theory: conceptualizing the issue, in local and world perspective. Soc Sci Med. 2012; 74: 1675–83.
  • Connell RW. Gender and power: society, the person and sexual politics. 1987; Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Springer KW, Hankivsky O, Bates LM. Gender and health: relational, intersectional, and biosocial approaches. Soc Sci Med. 2012; 74: 1661–6.
  • CSDH (2008). Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final Report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  • Bates LM, Hankivsky O, Springer KW. Gender and health inequities: a comment on the final report of the WHO Commission on the Social Determinants of Health. Soc Sci Med. 2009; 69: 1002–4.
  • Bourdieu P. The logic of practice. 1990; Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Adkins L, Skeggs B. Feminism after Bourdieu. 2004; Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Öhman A. Profession on the move: changing conditions and gendered development in physiotherapy. 2001; Umeå: Umeå University.
  • Hammarström A, Wiklund M, Stålnacke B-M, Lehti A, Haukenes I, Fjellman-Wiklund A. Developing a tool for increasing the awareness about gendered and intersectional processes in the clinical assessment of patients – A study of pain rehabilitation. PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0152735.
  • Haukenes I, Hensing G, Stalnacke BM, Hammarstrom A. Does pain severity guide selection to multimodal pain rehabilitation across gender?. Eur J Pain. 2015; 19: 826–33.
  • Lehti A, Fjellman-Wiklund A, Stålnacke B-M, Hammarström A, Wiklund M. Walking down ‘Via Dolorosa’ from primary health care to the specialty pain clinic – patient and professional perceptions of inequity in rehabilitation of chronic pain. Scand J Caring Sci. 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/scs.12312.
  • Dahlgren L, Emmelin M, Winkvist A. Qualitative methodology for international public health. 2004; Umeå: Epidemiology and Public Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University.
  • Kvale S. Interviews. An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. 1996; London: Sage.
  • Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004; 24: 105–12.
  • Downe-Wamboldt B. Content analysis: method, applications, and issues. Health Care Women Int. 1992; 13: 313–21.
  • Lehti AH, Johansson EE, Bengs C, Danielsson U, Hammarström A. ‘The Western Gaze’ – An analysis of medical research publications concerning the expressions of depression, focusing on ethnicity and gender. Health Care Women Int. 2010; 31: 100–12.
  • Alex L, Fjellman Wiklund A, Lundman B, Christianson M, Hammarström A. Beyond a dichotomous view of the concepts of ‘sex’ and ‘gender’ focus group discussions among gender researchers at a medical faculty. PLoS One. 2012; 7: e50275.
  • Wiklund M, Bengs C, Malmgren-Olsson E-B, Öhman A. Young women facing multiple and intersecting stressors of modernity, gender orders and youth. Soc Sci Med. 2010; 71: 1567–75.
  • Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005; 15: 1277–88.
  • Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. 1985; London: Sage.
  • Hamberg K. Gender bias in medicine. Womens Health. 2008; 4: 237–43.
  • Ahlsen B, Bondevik H, Mengshoel AM, Solbrække KN. (Un)doing gender in a rehabilitation context: a narrative analysis of gender and self in stories of chronic muscle pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2014; 36: 359–66.
  • Toye F, Seers K, Allcock N, Briggs M, Carr E, Andrews J, etal. Patients’ experiences of chronic non-malignant musculoskeletal pain: a qualitative systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2013; 63: e829–41.
  • Skuladottir H, Halldorsdottir S. The quest for well-being: self-identified needs of women in chronic pain. Scand J Caring Sci. 2011; 25: 81–91.
  • Jutel A, Nettleton S. Towards a sociology of diagnosis: reflections and opportunities. Soc Sci Med. 2011; 73: 793–800.
  • Ahlsen B, Mengshoel AM, Solbrække KN. Troubled bodies – troubled men: a narrative analysis of men's stories of chronic muscle pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2012; 34: 1765–73.
  • Haraway D. Simians, cyborgs, and women. The reinvention of nature. 1991; New York: Routledge.
  • WHO. Social determinants of health. World Health Organization. 2015. Available from: http://www.who.int/social_determinants/sdh_definition/en/ [cited 16 March 2016]..
  • Socialdepartementet (1982). Svensk författningssamling (SFS) [Health Care Law]. Stockholm: Socialdepartementet.