Campylobacter growth rates in four different matrices: broiler caecal material, live birds, Bolton broth, and brain heart infusion broth

References

• Sasaki Y, Haruna M, Mori T, Kusakawa M, Murakami M, Tsujiyama Y, etal. Quantitative estimation of Campylobacter cross contamination in carcasses and chicken products at an abattoir. Food Control. 2013; 43: 10–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ). Scientific opinion on Campylobacter in broiler meat production: control options and performance objectives and/or targets at different stages of the food chain. EFSA J. 2011; 9: 2105.
   Google Scholar
• EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ). Scientific opinion on quantification of the risk posed by broiler meat to human campylobacteriosis in the EU. EFSA J. 2010; 8: 1437.
   Google Scholar
• EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ). Analysis of the baseline survey on the prevalence of Campylobacter in broiler batches and of Campylobacter and Salmonella on broiler carcasses, in the EU, 2008; part B: analysis of factors associated with Campylobacter colonization of broiler batches and with Campylobacter contamination of broiler carcasses; and investigation of the culture method diagnostic characteristics used to analyse broiler carcass samples. EFSA J . 2010; 1522.
   Google Scholar
• Koolman L, Whyte P, Bolton DJ. An investigation of broiler caecal Campylobacter counts at first and second thinning. J Appl Microbiol. 2014; 117: 876–81. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Newell DG. The ecology of Campylobacter jejuni in avian and human hosts and in the environment. Int J Infect Dis. 2002; 6: 3516–21.
   Google Scholar
• Thakur S, Brake J, Keelara S, Zou M, Susick E. Farm and environmental distribution of Campylobacter and Salmonella in broiler flocks. Res Vet Sci. 2013; 94: 33–42. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Clench M, Mathias JR. The Avian cecum: a review. Wilson Bull. 1995; 107: 93–121.
   Google Scholar
• Commission Regulation (EC) 2073 on Microbiological criteria for foodstuffs of 2005. Pub.L.No 338, 1–26, 22nd December 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Reich F, Atanassova V, Haunhorst E, Klein G. The effects of Campylobacter numbers on the contamination of broiler carcasses with Campylobacter. Int J Food Microbiol. 2008; 127: 116–20. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• International Organisation for Standardisation. Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs–Horizontal method for detection and enumeration of Campylobacter spp., ISO-10272-1. 2006; Geneva, Switzerland: International Organisation for Standardisation.
   Google Scholar
• International Organisation for Standardisation. Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs. Horizontal method for detection and enumeration of Campylobacter spp. 2006; Geneva, Switzerland: International Organisation for Standardisation. part 2: Colony-count technique, ISO-10272-2.
   Google Scholar
• Sobratee N, Mohee R, Driver MFB. Variation of broth composition by addition of broiler litter composting substrate extracts: influence on faecal bacterial growth. J Appl Microbiol. 2009; 107: 1287–97. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Konkel ME, Christensen JE, Dhillon AS, Lane AB, Hare-Sanford R, Schaberg DM, etal. Campylobacter jejuni strains compete for colonization in broiler chicks. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007; 73: 2297–305. [PubMed Abstract] [PubMed CentralFull Text].
   Google Scholar
• Corcoran AT, Moran AP. Influence of growth conditions on diverse polysaccharide production by Campylobacter jejuni. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2007; 49: 124–32. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Hue O, Allain V, Laisney M-J, Le Bouquin S, Lalande F, Petetin I, etal. Campylobacter contamination of broiler caeca and carcasses at the slaughterhouse and correlation with salmonella contamination. Food Microbiol. 2011; 28: 862–8. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Hansson I, Pudas N, Harbom B, Olsson Engvall E. Within-flock variations of Campylobacter loads in caeca and on carcasses from broilers. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010; 141: 51–5. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Grant IH, Richardson NJ, Bokkenheuser VD. Broiler chickens as potential source of Campylobacter infections in humans. J Clin Microbiol. 1980; 11: 508–10. [PubMed Abstract] [PubMed CentralFull Text].
   Google Scholar
• Stern NJ, Robach MC. Enumeration of Campylobacter spp. in broiler faeces and in corresponding processed carcasses. J Food Prot. 2003; 66: 1557–63. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Král M, Angelovičová M, Mrázová L. Application of probiotics in poultry production. Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2012; 45: 55–7.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenquist H, Sommer HM, Nielsen NL, Christensen BB. The effect of slaughter operations on the contamination of chicken carcasses with thermo-tolerant Campylobacter. Int J Food Microbiol. 2006; 108: 226–32. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Nuata M, Hill A, Rosenquist H, Brynestad S, Fetsch A, Van der Logt P, etal. A comparison of risk assessments on Campylobacter in broiler meat. Int J Food Microbiol. 2009; 129: 107–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food Safety Authority of Ireland (FSAI). Report of the scientific committee of the food safety authority of Ireland. 2011; Dublin: FSAI. In recommendations for a practical control programme for Campylobacter in the poultry production and slaughter chain.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Zeyara S, Jarvis B, Mackey BM. The inhibitory effect of natural microflora of food on growth of Listeria monocytogenes in enrichment broths. Int J Food Microbiol. 2011; 145: 98–105. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar