Women's perspectives on illness when being screened for cervical cancer

References

• Government of Greenland. Befolkningen i Grønland (The population of Greenland). 2013. [cited 2013 Feb 8]. Available from: http://uk.nanoq.gl/Emner/About/Population.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Sander BB, Rebolj M, Valentiner-Branth P, Lynge E. Introduction of human papillomavirus vaccination in Nordic countries. Vaccine Q. 2012; 8: 1425–33.
   Google Scholar
• Kern P. Screening for livmoderhalskræft i Grønland (Screening for cervical cancer in Greenland). Nakorsanut. 2010; 1: 18–19.
   Google Scholar
• The National Board of Health in Greenland. Landslægeembedet årsberetning 2009 (Annual Report 2009). 2009; Nuuk: The National Board of Health in Greenland.
   Google Scholar
• Arbyn M, Rebolj M, De Kok IM, Fender M, Becker N, O'Reilly M, etal. The challenge of organising screening programmes in the 15 old member states of The European Union. Eur J Cancer. 2009; 45: 2671–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO/ICO Information Centre on HPV and Cervical Cancer (HPV Information Centre). Human Papillomavirus and related cancers: world. Barcelona: WHO/ICO. [cited 2012 Nov 14]. Available from: www.who.int/hpvcentre.
   Google Scholar
• Cerigo H, Macdonald ME, Franco EL, Brassard P. Inuit women's attitudes and experiences towards cervical cancer and prevention strategies in Nunavik, Quebec. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2012; 71: 17996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Inequalities in young people's health: key findings from the health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) 2005/2006 survey. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/en/what-we-do/health-topics/Life-stages/child-and-adolescent-health/publications/2008/inequalities-in-young-peoples-health.-hbsc-international-report-from-the-20052006-survey.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Department of Health Cancerregisteret. Nye tal fra Sundhedsstyrelsen (New statistics from the Department of Health). 2009; Copenhagen: Danish Department of Health. 13.
   Google Scholar
• Jeppesen U. Stor risiko eller lille chance. Faktorer, der har betydning, når kvinder vælger mellem deltagelse og ikke-deltagelse i den forebyggende undersøgelse for livmoderhalskræft. (Big risk little chance: factors of importance when women choose to participate or not in preventative cervical cancer screening). [Unpublished dissertation]. 2000; Aarhus: University of Aarhus.
   Google Scholar
• Espersen MM, Holten IW. Barriere for screening for livmoderhalskræft (Barriers to cervical cancer screening). Ugeskr. Læger. 2005; 167: 4371–4.
   Google Scholar
• Hislop TG, Clarke HF, Deschamps M, Joseph R, Band PR, Smith J, etal. Cervical cytology screening: how can we improve rates among First Nations women in urban British Columbia?. Can Fam Phys. 1996; 42: 1701–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz M, Savage W, George J, Emohare L. Women's knowledge and experience of cervical screening: a failure of health education and medical organization. Community Med. 1989; 11: 279–89.
   Google Scholar
• Zehbe I, Møller H, Severini A, Weaver B, Escott N, Bell C, etal. A pilot study to assess feasibility of self-sampling and human pappilomavirus testing for cervical cancer prevention: a pilot study in First Nations women from Northwest Ontario, Canada. BMJ Open. [cited 2012 Nov 12]..
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur P. Interpretation theory: discourse and surplus of meaning. 1976; Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindseth A, Norberg A. A phenomenological method for researching lived experience. Scand J Caring Sci. 2004; 18: 145–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hounsgaard L. Potentiel sygdom sætter spor (Potential disease leaves a mark) [dissertation]. 2004; Aarhus: Det Sundhedsvidenskabelige Fakultet (Department of Health Sciences), University of Aarhus.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyer P, Pedersen BD. Distanciation in Ricoeur's theory of interpretation: narration in a study of life experiences of living with chronic illness and home mechanical ventilation. Nursing Inq. 2009; 16: 64–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northern Nurses’ Federation. Ethical guidelines for nursing research in the Nordic countries. 2003; Oslo: Allservice A/S.
   Google Scholar
• Augustussen M. Screening for livmoderhalskræft. Grønlandsktalende kvinders hverdagslivsperspektiv på celleforandringer (Screening for cervical cancer. Greenladic speaking women's everyday life perspectives on cervical cell changes). [Unpublished dissertation]. 2011; Odense: University of Southern Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Forss A, Tishelman C, Widmark C, Lundgren E, Sachs L, Törnberg S. “I got a letter.” A qualitative study of womens reasoning about attendance in cervical cancer screening programme in urban Sweden. Psychooncology. 2001; 10: 76–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomberg K, Forss A, Ternestedt BM, Tishelman C. From ‘silent’ to ‘heard’: professional mediation, manipulation and women's experiences of their body after an abnormal Pap smear. Soc Sci Med. 2009; 68: 479–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh AM, Broom HD. Women's understanding of abnormal cervical smears test results: a qualitative study. Br Med J. 1997; 314: 1388–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaffery K, Irwig L. Australian women's needs and preferences for information about human papillomavirus in cervical screening. J Med Screen. 2005; 12: 134–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travelbee J. Interpersonal aspects of nursing. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Bro F, Andersen B. Screening for livmoderhalskræft: Nye retningslinjer og deres betydning for almen praksis (Screening for cervical cancer: new guidelines and their effect on General Practice). Månedsskrift for almen praksis. 2012; 90: 534–41.
   Google Scholar
• Tacken MA, Braspenning JC, Hermens RP, Spreeuwenberg PM, van den Hoogen HJ, de Bakker DH, Groenewegen PP, Grol RP. Uptake of cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands is mainly influenced by women's beliefs about the screening and by the inviting organization. Eur J Public Health. 2007; 17: 178–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Partnership against Cancer. Strategies to maximize participation in cervical screening in Canada: catalogue of interventions. 2010; Ottawa: Canadian Partnership against Cancer.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Inter Wiew. 2008; Sage, Publication, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Cerigo H, Macdonald ME, Franco EL, Brassard P. HPV detection by self-sampling in Nunavik, Quebec: Inuit women's sampling method preferences. J Aboriginal Health. 2012; 8: 29–39.
   Google Scholar