Local perspectives of the ability of HIA stakeholder engagement to capture and reflect factors that impact Alaska Native health

References

• European Centre for Health Policy. Health impact assessment: main concepts and suggested approach. Gothenburg census paper. 1999; Brussels: WHO Regional Office for Europe. [cited 2013 Oct 15]. Available from: http://www.apho.org.uk/resource/view.aspx?RID =44163.
   Google Scholar
• Health Canada. Canadian handbook on health impact assessment: volume 1: the basics. 2004; Canada: Ministry of Health. [cited 2013 Oct 15]. Available from: http://www.publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/H46-2-99-235E-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wernham A. Health impact assessments are needed in decision making about environmental and land-use policy. Health Aff. 2011; 30: 947–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry JM, Kemm JR. On behalf of all participants of the Evaluation of Health Impact Assessment Workshop. Criteria for use in the evaluation of health impact assessments. Public Health. 2005; 119: 1122–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler MS, Krieger GR, Divall MJ, Cisse G, Wielga M, Singer BH, etal. Untapped potential of health impact assessment. Bull World Health Organ. 2013; 91: 298–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State of Alaska Department of Health and Social Services. Alaska health impact assessment (HIA) program. [cited 2013 Oct 15]. Available from: http://www.epi.alaska.gov/hia/.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney M. Walking the walk? Community participation in HIA: a qualitative interview study. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2004; 24: 217–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stakeholder Participation Working Group in the 2010 HIA in the Americas Workshop. Best practices for stakeholder participation in health impact assessment. 2011; CA: Oakland. [cited 2013 Oct 15]. Available from: http://www.healthimpactproject.org/resources/document/Guide-for-Stakeholder-Participation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• International Finance Corporation. Introduction to health impact assessment. 2009. [cited 2014 Mar 1]. Available from: http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/topics_ext_content/ifc_external_corporate_site/ifc+sustainability/publications/publications_handbook_healthimpactassessment__wci__1319578475704.
   Google Scholar
• State of Alaska HIA Program, Department of Health and Social Services. Technical guidance for health impact assessment (HIA) in Alaska. 2011; Alaska, AK: Department of Health and Social Services. [81 p] [cited 2013 Mar 15]. Available from: http://www.epi.hss.state.ak.us/hia/AlaskaHIAToolkit.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lockie S, Franetovich M, Sharma S, Rolfe J. Democratisation versus engagement? Social and economic impact assessment and community participation in the coal mining industry of the Bowen Basin, Australia. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 2008; 26: 177–87.
   Google Scholar
• International Council on Mining and Metals. Good practice guidance on health impact assessment. 2010; London: International Council on Mining and Metals. [89 p] [cited 2014 Mar 1]. Available from: http://www.icmm.com/library/hia.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatia R. A guide for health impact assessment. 2010; San Francisco, CA: California Department of Public Health. [67 p] [cited 2013 Oct 15]. Available from: http://www.cdph.ca.gov/pubsforms/Guidelines/Documents/HIA Guide FINAL 10-19-10.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ali S, O'Callaghan V, Middleton JD, Little R. The challenges of evaluating a health impact assessment. Crit Public Health. 2009; 19: 171–80.
   Google Scholar
• Kwiatkowski RE, Tikhonov C, Peace DM, Bourassa C. Canadian Indigenous engagement and capacity building in health impact assessment. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 2009; 27: 57–67.
   Google Scholar
• Kwiatkowski RE. Indigenous community based participatory research and health impact assessment: a Canadian example. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2011; 31: 445–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamburrini A, Gilhuly K, Harris-Roxas B. Enhancing benefits in health impact assessment through stakeholder consultation. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 2011; 29: 195–204.
   Google Scholar
• Tindana PO, Rozmovits L, Boulanger RF, Bandewar SVS, Aborigo RA, Hodgson AVO, etal. Aligning community engagement with traditional authority structures in global health research: a case study from northern Ghana. Am J Public Health. 2011; 101: 1857–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopher S, Watts V, McCormick AK, Young S. Building and maintaining trust in a community-based participatory research partnership. Am J Public Health. 2008; 98: 1398–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negev M. Knowledge, data and interests: challenges in participation of diverse stakeholders in HIA. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2012; 33: 48–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott E, Williams G. Developing a civic intelligence: local involvement in HIA. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2004; 24: 231–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss H. Involving the Finnish public in nuclear facility licensing: participatory democracy and industrial bias. J Integr Environ Sci. 2011; 7: 211–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friendship KA, Furgal CM. The role of Indigenous knowledge in environmental health risk management in Yukon, Canada. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2012; 71: 19003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wernham A. Building a statewide health impact assessment program: a case study from Alaska. Northwest Public Health. 2009; 26: 16–17.
   Google Scholar
• NewFields Companies. Health impacts assessment for proposed coal mine at Wishbone Hill, Matanuska-Susitna Borough Alaska. 2012; Alaska, AK: Alaska Department of Health and Social Services, Health Impact Assessment Program. [40 p] [cited 2014 Mar 1]. Available from: http://www.epi.hss.state.ak.us/hia/WishboneHillDraftHIA.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Athabascan Nation Chickaloon Village. Brief history. [cited 2013 Jan 10]. Available from: http://www.chickaloon.org/about/brief-history.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan-Bolyai S, Bova C, Harper D. Developing and refining interventions in persons with health disparities: the use of qualitative description. Nurs Outlook. 2005; 53: 127–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neergaard MA, Olesen F, Andersen RS, Sondergaard J. Qualitative description—the poor cousin of health research?. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009; 9: 52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description?. Res Nurs Health. 2000; 23: 334–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne J, Oberle K. Enhancing rigor in qualitative description: a case study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2005; 32: 413–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Pelle N. Simplifying qualitative data analysis using general purpose software tools. Field Methods. 2004; 18: 85–108.
   Google Scholar
• Mindell J, Biddulph J, Taylor L, Lock K, Boaz A, Joffe M. Improving the use of evidence in health impact assessment. World Health Organization. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2010;88(7):543–50.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond CAM, Ross NA. The determinants of First Nation and Inuit health: a critical population health approach. Health Place. 2009; 15: 403–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar