Food-producing animals and their health in relation to human health

References

• Tellez G, Higgins S, Donoghue A, Hargis B. Digestive physiology and the role of microorganisms. J Appl Poult Res 2006; 15: 136–44.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson GR, Roberfroit MB. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics. J Nutr 1995; 125: 1401–12.
   Google Scholar
• Hammes WP, Hertel C. Research approaches for pre-and probiotics: challenges and outlook. Food Res Int 2002; 35: 165–70.
   Google Scholar
• Molinaro F, Paschetta E, Cassader M, Gambino R, Musso G. Probiotics, prebiotics, energy balance, and obesity: mechanistic insights and therapeutic implications. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2012; 41: 843–54.
   Google Scholar
• Teitelbaum JE, Walker WA. Nutritional impact of pre-and probiotics as protective gastrointestinal organisms. Annu Rev Nutr 2002; 22: 107–38.
   Google Scholar
• Parracho H, McCartney AL, Gibson GR. Probiotics and prebiotics in infant nutrition. Proc Nutr Soc 2007; 66: 405–11.
   Google Scholar
• Kerac M, Bunn J, Seal A, Thindwa M, Tomkins A, Sadler K, et al. Probiotics and prebiotics for severe acute malnutrition (PRONUT study): a double-blind efficacy randomised controlled trial in Malawi. Lancet 2009; 374: 136–44.
   Google Scholar
• Walter J, Britton RA, Roos S. Host-microbial symbiosis in the vertebrate gastrointestinal tract and the Lactobacillus reuteri paradigm. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2001; 108: 4645–52.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller R, Brooker B. Lactobacilli which attach to the crop epithelium of the fowl. Am J Clin Nutr 1974; 27: 1305–12.
   Google Scholar
• Dale C, Moran NA. Molecular interactions between bacterial symbionts and their hosts. Cell 2006; 126: 453–65.
   Google Scholar
• Moran NA. Symbiosis as an adaptive process and source of phenotypic complexity. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104: 8627–33.
   Google Scholar
• Choct M. Managing gut health through nutrition. Br Poult Sci 2009; 50: 9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Gill N, Wlodarska M, Finlay BB. The future of mucosal immunology: studying an integrated system-wide organ. Nat Immunol 2010; 11: 558–60.
   Google Scholar
• Fraune S, Bosch TC. Why bacteria matter in animal development and evolution. Bioessays 2010; 32: 571–80.
   Google Scholar
• Yegani M, Korver D. Factors affecting intestinal health in poultry. Poult Sci 2008; 87: 2052–63.
   Google Scholar
• Maslowski KM, Mackay CR. Diet, gut microbiota and immune responses. Nat Immunol 2010; 12: 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Musso G, Gambino R, Cassader M. Obesity, diabetes, and gut microbiota. The hygiene hypothesis expanded? Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 2277–84.
   Google Scholar
• Kau AL, Ahern PP, Griffin NW, Goodman AL, Gordon JI. Human nutrition, the gut microbiome and the immune system. Nature 2011; 474: 327–36.
   Google Scholar
• Mathew AG, Cissell R, Liamthong S. Antibiotic resistance in bacteria associated with food animals: a United States perspective of livestock production. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2007; 4: 115–33.
   Google Scholar
• Dominguez-Bello MG, Blaser NU. Do you have a probiotic in your future? Microbes Infect 2008; 10: 1072–6.
   Google Scholar
• Carter AJ, Adams MR, Woodward MJ, La Ragione RM. Control strategies for Salmonella colonization of poultry: the probiotic perspective. Food Sci Technol 2009; 5: 103–15.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman PM, Ossa JC, Johnson-Henry K. Unraveling mechanisms of action of probiotics. Nutr Clin Pract 2009; 24: 10–4.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald TT, Bell I. Probiotics and the immune response to vaccines. Proc Nutr Soc 2010; 69: 442–6.
   Google Scholar
• Tellez G, Pixley C, Wolfenden R, Layton S, Hargis B. Probiotics/direct fed microbials for Salmonella control in poultry. Food Res Int 2012; 45: 628–33.
   Google Scholar
• Isolauri E, Kirjavainen P, Salminen S. Probiotics: a role in the treatment of intestinal infection and inflammation? Gut 2002; 50: iii 54–9.
   Google Scholar
• Salminen S, Isolauri E. Intestinal colonization, microbiota, and probiotics. J Pediatr 2006; 149: S115–20.
   Google Scholar
• Parvez S, Malik K, Ah Kang S, Kim HI. Probiotics and their fermented food products are beneficial for health. J Appl Microbiol 2006; 100: 1171–85.
   Google Scholar
• Braat H, van den Brande J, van Tol E, Hommes D, Peppelenbosch M, van Deventer S. Lactobacillus rhamnosus induces peripheral hyporesponsiveness in stimulated CD4 + T cells via modulation of dendritic cell function. Am J Clin Nutr 2004; 80: 1618–25.
   Google Scholar
• Borchers AT, Selmi C, Meyers FJ, Keen CL, Gershwin ME. Probiotics and immunity. J Gastroenterol 2009; 44: 26–46.
   Google Scholar
• Levkut M, Revajova V, Laukova A, Sevcikova Z, Spigakova V, Faixova Z, et al. Leukocytic responses and intestinal mucin dynamics of broilers protected with Enterococcus faecium EF55 and challenged with Salmonella Enteritidis. Res Vet Sci 2012; 93: 195–201.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez-Olmos MI, Oberhelman RA. Probiotic agents and infectious diseases: a modem perspective on a traditional therapy. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 32: 1567–76.
   Google Scholar
• Reveneau N, Geoffroy MC, Locht C, Chagnaud P, Mercenier A. Comparison of the immune responses induced by local immunizations with recombinant Lactobacillus plantarum producing tetanus toxin fragment C in different cellular locations. Vaccine 2002; 20: 1769–77.
   Google Scholar
• Famell M, Donoghue A, De Los Santos FS, Blore P, Hargis B, Tellez G, et al. Upregulation of oxidative burst and degranulation in chicken heterophils stimulated with probiotic bacteria. Poult Sci 2006; 85: 1900–6.
   Google Scholar
• Jounai K, Ikado K, Sugimura T, Ano Y, Braun J, Fujiwara D. Spherical lactic acid bacteria activate plasmacytoid dendritic cells immunomodulatory function via TLR9-dependent cross-talk with myeloid dendritic cells. PLoS One 2012; 7: e32588.
   Google Scholar
• Arvola T, Laiho K, Torkkeli S, Mykkänen H, Salminen S, Maunula L, et al. Prophylactic Lactobacillus GG reduces antibiotic-associated diarrhea in children with respiratory infections: A randomized study. Pediatrics 1999; 104: e64.
   Google Scholar
• Kalliomaki M, Salminen S, Arvilommi H, Kero P, Koskinen P, Isolauri E, et al. Probiotics in primary prevention of atopic disease: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2001; 357: 1076–9.
   Google Scholar
• FAO, WHO (2001). Report of a Joint FAO/WHO expert consultation on evaluation of health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. Córdoba, Argentina. Available from: http://www.mesanders.com/probio_report.pdf [cited 1-4 October 2001].
   Google Scholar
• Ouwehand A, Isolauri E, Salminen S. The role of the intestinal microflora for the development of the immune system in early childhood. Eur J Nutr 2002; 41(Suppl 1): i32–137.
   Google Scholar
• Salzman NH. Microbiota-immune system interaction: an uneasy alliance. Curr Opin Microbiol 2011; 14: 99–105.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins J, Higgins S, Wolfenden A, Henderson S, Torres-Rodriguez A, Vicente J, et al. Effect of lactic acid bacteria probiotic culture treatment timing on Salmonella Enteritidis in neonatal broilers. Poult Sci 2010; 89: 243–7.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins S, Wolfenden A, Tellez G, Hargis B, Porter T. Transcriptional profiling of cecal gene expression in probiotic-and Salmonella-challenged neonatal chicks. Poult Sci 2011; 90: 901–13.
   Google Scholar
• Akira S, Uematsu S, Takeuchi O. Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell 2006; 124: 783–801.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins SE, Erf GF, Higgins JP, Henderson SN, Wolfenden AD, Gaona-Ramirez G, et al. Effect of probiotic treatment in broiler chicks on intestinal macrophage numbers and phago-cytosis of Salmonella Enteritidis by abdominal exudate cells. Poult Sci 2007; 86: 2315–21.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfenden A, Pixley C, Higgins J, Higgins S, Vicente J, Torres-Rodriguez A, et al. Evaluation of spray application of a Lactobacillus-based probiotic on Salmonella Enteritidis colonization in broiler chickens. Int J Poult Sci 2007; 6: 493–6.
   Google Scholar
• Vicente J, Higgins S, Hargis B, Tellez G. Effect of poultry guard litter amendment on horizontal transmission of Salmonella Enteritidis in broiler chicks. Int J Poult Sci 2007; 6: 314–7.
   Google Scholar
• Vicente JL, Torres-Rodriguez A, Higgins SE, Pixley C, Tellez G, Donoghue AM, et al. Effect of a selected Lacto-bacillus spp.-based probiotic on Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis-infected broiler chicks. Avian Dis 2008; 52: 143–6.
   Google Scholar
• Menconi A, Wolfenden A, Shivaramaiah S, Terraes J, Urbano T, Kuttel J, et al. Effect of lactic acid bacteria probiotic culture for the treatment of Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg in neonatal broiler chickens and turkey poults. Poult Sci 2011; 90: 561–5.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins S, Torres-Rodriguez A, Vicente J, Sartor C, Pixley C, Nava G, et al. Evaluation of intervention strategies for idiopathic diarrhea in commercial turkey brooding houses. J Appl Poult Res 2005; 14: 345–8.
   Google Scholar
• Tones-Rodriguez A, Higgins S, Vicente J, Wolfenden A, Gaona-Ramirez G, Barton J, et al. Effect of lactose as a prebiotic on turkey body weight under commercial conditions. J Appl Poult Res 2007; 16: 635–41.
   Google Scholar
• Menconi A, Kallapura G, Latorre JD, Morgan MJ, Pumford NR, Hargis BM, et al. Identification and characterization of lactic acid bacteria in a commercial probiotic culture. Biosci Microb Food Health 2014; 33: 25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Vreeland RH, Rosenzweig WD, Powers DW. Isolation of a 250 million-year-old halotolerant bacterium from a primary salt crystal. Nature 2000; 407: 897–900.
   Google Scholar
• Park E, Jeon GI, Park JS, Paik HD. A probiotic strain of Bacillus polyfermenticus reduces DMH induced precancerous lesions in F344 male rat. Biol Pharm Bull 2007; 30: 569–74.
   Google Scholar
• O'Mahony L, Feeney M, O'Halloran S, Murphy L, Kiely B, Fitzgibbon J, et al. Probiotic impact on microbial flora, inflammation and tumour development in IL-10 knockout mice. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2001; 15: 1219–25.
   Google Scholar
• Anadón A, Martinez-Larrafiaga MR, Aranzazu Martinez M. Probiotics for animal nutrition in the European Union. Regulation and safety assessment. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2006; 45: 91–5.
   Google Scholar
• Barbosa TM, Serra CR, La Ragione RM, Woodward MJ, Henriques AO. Screening for bacillus isolates in the broiler gastrointestinal tract. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005; 71: 968–78.
   Google Scholar
• Ducle H, Hong HA, Barbosa TM, Henriques AO, Cutting SM. Characterization of Bacillus probiotics available for human use. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004; 70: 2161–71.
   Google Scholar
• Hong HA, Ducle H, Cutting SM. The use of bacterial spore formers as probiotics. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2005; 29: 813–35.
   Google Scholar
• Hong HA, Huang JM, Khaneja R, Hiep LV, Urdaci MC, Cutting SM. The safety of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus indicus as food probiotics. J Appl Microbiol 2008; 105: 510–20.
   Google Scholar
• McNulty CA, Boyle P, Nichols T, Clappison P, Davey P. The public's attitudes to and compliance with antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007; 60(Suppl 1): i63–8.
   Google Scholar
• Osipova IG, Makhailova NA, Sorokulova IB, Vasireva EA, Gaiderov AA. Spore probiotics. Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol 2003; 3: 113–9.
   Google Scholar
• Williams P. Quorum sensing, communication and cross-kingdom signalling in the bacterial world. Microbiol 2007; 153: 3923–38.
   Google Scholar
• Wolken WA, Tramper J, van der Werf MJ. What can spores do for us? Trends Biotechnol 2003; 21: 338–45.
   Google Scholar
• Latorre JD, Hemandez-Velasco X, Kallapura G, Menconi A, Pumford NR, Morgan MJ, et al. Evaluation of germination, distribution and persistence of Bacillus subtilis spores through the gastrointestinal tract of chickens. Poult Sci 2014; 93: 1-8.4.
   Google Scholar
• Casula G, Cutting SM. Bacillus probiotics: spore germination in the gastrointestinal tract. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002; 68: 2344–52.
   Google Scholar
• Ducle H, Hong HA, Cutting SM. Germination of the spore in the gastrointestinal tract provides a novel route for heterologous antigen delivery. Vaccine 2003; 21: 4215–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hoa TT, Duc LH, Isticato R, Baccigalupi L, Ricca E, Van PH, et al. Fate and dissemination of Bacillus subtilis spores in a murine model. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001; 67: 3819–23.
   Google Scholar
• Aureli P, Fiore A, Scalfaro C, Casale M, Franciosa G. National survey outcomes on commercial probiotic food supplements in Italy. Int J Food Microbiol 2010; 137: 265–73.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfenden RE, Pumford NR, Morgan MJ, Shivaramaiah S, Wolfenden AD, Tellez G. Evaluation of a screening and selection method for bacillus isolates for use as effective direct-fed microbials in commercial poultry. Int J Poult Sci 2010; 9: 317–23.
   Google Scholar
• Shivaramaiah S, Pumford NR, Morgan MJ, Wolfenden RE, Wolfenden AD, Torres-Rodriguez A, et al. Evaluation of Bacillus species as potential candidates for direct-fed microbials in commercial poultry. Poult Sci 2011; 90: 1574–80.
   Google Scholar
• Hungate RE. The rumen and its microbes. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Yokoyama MG, Johnson KA. Microbiology of the rumen and intestine. In: Church DC, ed. The ruminant animal: digestive physiology and nutrition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Waveland Press; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Freter R. Control mechanisms of the large-intestinal micro-flora and its influence on the host. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam 1989; 19: 197–217.
   Google Scholar
• Russell JB, Hino T. Regulation of lactate production in Streptococcus bovis: a spiraling effect that contributes to rumen acidosis. J Dairy Sci 1985; 68: 1712–21.
   Google Scholar
• Frey JC, Pell AN, Berthiume R, Lapierre H, Lee S, Ha JK, et al. Comparative studies of microbial populations in the rumen, duodenum, ileum and faeces of lactating dairy cows. J Appl Microbiol 2010; 108: 1982–93.
   Google Scholar
• Durso LM, Wells JE, Harhay GP, Rice WC, Kuehn L, Bono JL, et al. Comparison of bacterial communities in faeces of beef cattle fed diets containing corn and wet distillers' grain with solubles. Lett Appl Microbiol 2012; 55: 109–14.
   Google Scholar
• Lyte M. The microbial organ in the gut as a driver of homeostasis and disease. Med Hypoth 2010; 74: 634–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ley RE, Lozupone CA, Hamady M, Knight R, Gordon JI. Worlds within worlds: evolution of the veterbrate gut microbiota. Nat Rev Microbiol 2008; 6: 766–88.
   Google Scholar
• Shanks OC, Kelty CA, Archibeque S, Jenkins M, Newton RJ, McLellan SL, et al. Community structures of fecal bacteria in cattle from different animal feeding operations. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011; 77: 2992–3001.
   Google Scholar
• Kim MS, Kim J, Kuehn LA, Bono JL, Berry ED, Kalchayanand N, et al. Investigation of bacterial diversity in the feces of cattle fed different diets. J Anim Sci 2014; 92: 683–94.
   Google Scholar
• Wells JE, Shackelford SD, Berry ED, Kalchayanand N, Bosilevac JM, Wheeler TL. Impact of reducing the level of wet distillers grains fed to cattle prior to harvest on prevalence and levels of Escherichia coli 0157:H7 in feces and on hides. J Food Prot 2011; 74: 1611–7.
   Google Scholar
• Durso LM, Harhay GP, Smith TP, Bono JL, DeSantis TZ, Clawson ML. Bacterial community analysis of beef cattle feedlots reveals pen surface is distinct from feces. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2011; 8: 647–9.
   Google Scholar
• Dowd SE, Callaway TR, Sun Y, McKeehan T, Hagevoort RG, Edrington TS. Evaluation of the bacterial diversity in the feces of cattle using bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP). BMC Microbiol 2008; 8: 125–32.
   Google Scholar
• Durso LM, Harhay GP, Smith TP, Bono JL, Desantis TZ, Harhay DM, et al. Animal-to-animal variation in fecal microbial diversity among beef cattle. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010; 76: 4858–62.
   Google Scholar
• Hristov AN, Callaway TR, Lee C, Dowd SE. Ruminal bacterial, archaeal, and fungal diversity of dairy cows with normal and reduced ruminal fauna. J Anim Sci 2012; 90: 4449–57.
   Google Scholar
• Callaway TR, Dowd SE, Edrington TS, Anderson RC, Krueger N, Bauer N, et al. Evaluation of bacterial diversity in the rumen and feces of cattle fed different levels of dried distillers grains plus solubles using bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing. J Anim Sci 2010; 88: 3977–83.
   Google Scholar
• Hook SE, Steele MA, Northwood KS, Wright ADG, McBride BW. Impact of high-concentrate feeding and low ruminal pH on methanogens and protozoa in the rumen of dairy cows. Microb Ecol 2011; 62: 94–105.
   Google Scholar
• Davies DR, Theodorou MK, Lawrence MIG, Trinci APJ. Distribution of anaerobic fungi in the digestive tract of cattle and their survival in faeces. J Gen Microbiol 1993; 139: 1395–400.
   Google Scholar
• Klieve AV, Gregg K, Bauchop T. Isolation and characterization of lytic phages from Bacteroides ruminicola ss brevis. Curr Microbiol 1991; 23: 183–7.
   Google Scholar
• Martin SA, Nisbet DJ. Effect of direct-fed microbials on rumen microbial fermentation. J Dairy Sci 1992; 75: 1736–44.
   Google Scholar
• Keen J, Elder R. Commercial probiotics are not effective for short-term control of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli 0157 infection in beef cattle. In: 4th International Symposium and Workshop on Shiga Toxin (Verocytotoxin)-Producing Escherichia coli Infection, Kyoto, Japan: VTEC; 2000, p. 92.
   Google Scholar
• Swyers KL, Carlson BA, Nightingale KK, Belk KE, Archibeque SL. Naturally colonized beef cattle populations fed combinations of yeast culture and an ionophore in finishing diets containing dried distiller's grains with solubles had similar fecal shedding of Escherichia coli 0157:H7. J Food Prot 2011; 74: 912–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ohya T, Akiba M, Ito H. Use of a trial probiotic product in calves experimentally infected with Escherichia coli 0157. Japan Agric Res Quart 2001; 35: 189–94.
   Google Scholar
• Lema M, Williams L, Rao DR. Reduction of fecal shedding of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli 0157:H7 in lambs by feeding microbial feed supplement. Small Rum Res 2001; 39: 31–9.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur TM, Bosilevac JM, Kalchayanand N, Wells JE, Shackelford SD, Wheeler TL, et al. Evaluation of a direct-fed microbial product effect on the prevalence and load of Escherichia coli 0157:H7 in feedlot cattle. J Food Prot 2010; 73: 366–71.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Palacios A, Staempfli HR, Duffield T, Weese JS. Isolation of bovine intestinal Lactobacillus plantarum and Pediococcus acidilactici with inhibitory activity against Escherichia coli 0157 and F5. J Appl Microbiol 2009; 106: 393–401.
   Google Scholar
• Cleveland J, Montville TJ, Nes IF, Chikindas ML. Bacter-iocins: safe, natural antimicrobials for food preservation. Int J Food Microbiol 2001; 71: 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Gallo RL, Murakami M, Ohtake T, Zaiou M. Biology and clinical relevance of naturally occurring antimicrobial pep-tides. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002; 110: 823–31.
   Google Scholar
• Welman AD, Maddox IS. Exopolysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria: perspectives and challenges. TRENDS Biotechnol 2003; 21: 269–74.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesner J, Vilcinskas A. Antimicrobial peptides: the ancient arm of the human immune system. Virulence 2010; 1: 440–64.
   Google Scholar
• Nes IF, Holo H. Class II Antimicrobial peptides from lactic acid bacteria. Biopolymers 2000; 55: 50–61.
   Google Scholar
• Franz CM, Van Belkum MJ, Holzappfel HW, Abriouel H, Gálvéz A. Diversity of enterococcal bacteriocins and their grouping in a new classification scheme. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2007; 31: 293–310.
   Google Scholar
• Franz CM, Stiles ME, Schleifer KH, Holzappfel WH. Enterococci in foods - a coriandrum for food safety. Int J Food Microbiol 2003; 88: 105–22.
   Google Scholar
• Franz CM, Huch M, Abriouel H, Holzappfel W, Gálvéz A. Enterococci as probiotics and their implications in food safety. Int J Food Microbiol 2011; 151: 125–40.
   Google Scholar
• Lauková A, Mareková M, JavorskY P. Detection and antimicrobial spectrum of a bacteriocin-like substance produced by Enterococcus faecium CCM 4231. Lett Appl Microbiol 1993; 16: 257–60.
   Google Scholar
• Lauková A, Czikková S, Vasilková Z, Juri§ P, Mareková M. Occurrence of bacteriocin production among environmental enterococci. Lett Appl Microbiol 1998; 27: 178–82.
   Google Scholar
• Lauková A, Mareková M, §tyriak I. Inhibitory effect of different enterocins against fecal bacterial isolates. Berl Muench Tierarztl Wochensschr 2003; 116: 37–40.
   Google Scholar
• Mareková M, Lauková A, De Vuyst L, Skaugen M, Nes IF. Partial characterization of bacteriocins produced by environmental strain Enterococcus faecium EK13. J Appl Microbiol 2003; 94: 523–30.
   Google Scholar
• Mareková M, Lauková A, Skaugen M, Nes IF. Isolation and characterization of a new bacteriocin, termed enterocin M, produced by environmental isolate Enterococcus faecium AL41. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2007; 34: 533–7.
   Google Scholar
• Simonová MP, Lauková A, Plachd I, tobanová K, Strompfová V, Szabóová R, et al. Can enterocins affect phagocytosis and glutathione-peroxidase in rabbits? Cent Eur J Biol 2013; 8: 730–4.
   Google Scholar
• Szabóová R, Chrastinová L, Lauková A, Haviarová M, Simonová M, Strompfová V, et al. Bacteriocin producing strain E. faecium CCM4231 and its use in rabbits. Int J Probiotics Prebiotics 2008; 3: 77–82.
   Google Scholar
• Simonová MP, Lauková A, Chrastinová L, Strompfová V, Faix S, Vasilková Z, et al. Enterococcus faecium CCM 7420, bacteriocin PPB CCM 7420 and their effect in the digestive tract of rabbits. Czech J Anim Sci 2009; 54: 376–86.
   Google Scholar
• Lauková A, Chrastinová L, Pogánysimonová M, Strompfová V, Plachd I, tobanová K, et al. Enterococcus faecium AL41, its Enterocin M and their beneficial use in rabbits husbandry. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 2012; 4: 243–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lauková A, Guba P, Nemcová R, Mareková M. Inhibition of Salmonella enterica serovar Duesseldorf by enterocin A in gnotobiotic Japanese quails. Vet Med Czech 2004; 49: 47–51.
   Google Scholar
• Lauková A, Strompfová V, Skfivanová V, Volek Z, Jindfichová E, Marounek M. Bacteriocin-producing strain of Enterococcus faecium EK13 with probiotic character and its application in the digestive tract of rabbits. Biol Bratislava 2006; 61: 779–82.
   Google Scholar
• Metchnikoff E. The prolongation of life: optimistic studies. Broadway, NY: Springer; 1907.
   Google Scholar