Creating a Culture for Interdisciplinary Collaborative Professional Practice

References

• Romanow RJ. Building on values: The future of health care in Canada. Saskatoon, SK: Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada. Ottawa: Health Canada, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Orchard CA, Curran V. Centres of excellence for interdisciplinary collaborative professional practice. Prepared for Office of Nursing Policy: Health Canada, 2003
   Google Scholar
• Adams A, Bond S, Hale CA. Nursing organizational practice and its relationship with other features of ward organization and job satisfaction. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 1998, 27: 1212–1222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H. Toward healthier hospitals. Health Care Management Review, 1997, 22 (4): 9–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gummer B. Getting in and staying in, ‘the loop’: Networking and organizational power. Administration in Social Work, 1994, 18 (1): 107–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D. Assessing the political land-scape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35: 342–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernesky RH, Tirritor T. Sources of organizational power for women in the health care field. Social Work in Health Care, 1987, 12 (4): 93–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Halim AA. Power equalization, participative decision-making, and individuals differences. Human Relations, 1983, 36 (8): 683–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil K. (1978). Understanding organizational power: Building on the Weberian legacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1978, 23: 65–89.
   Google Scholar
• Vrfedenburgh D, Bender Y. The hierarchical abuse of power in work Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 1998, 17: 1337–1347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller R. Influence at work: A 25-year program of research. Human Relations, 1998, 51 (12): 1425–1451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair JD, Buesseler JA. Competitive forces in the medical group industry: A stakeholder perspective. Health Care Management Review, 1998, 23 (2): 7–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitzia J, Wood N. Patient satisfaction: A review of issues and concepts. Social Science Medicine, 1997, 45 (12): 1829–1843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker FH. Occupational and nonoccupational factors in job satisfaction and psychological distress among nurses. Research in Nursing & Health, 1997, 20: 453–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haug MR., Lavin B. (1981). Practitioner or patient - who’s in charge” Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1981, 22: 212–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song R., Daly FJ, Rudy EB, Douglas S. DyerMA. (1997). Nurses’ job satisfaction, absenteeism, and turnover after implementing a special care unit practice model. Research in Nursing & Health, 1997, 20: 443–452.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy C. Leiba-O&Sullivan. The power behind empowerment: Implications for research and practice.Human Relations, 1998,51 (4): 451–477.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter DJ. The changing role of health care personnel in health and health care management. Social Science & Medicine, 1996, 43 (5): 799–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle J. Understanding dissatisfied users: Developing a framework for comprehending criticisms of health care work. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 1999, 30 (3): 723–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staniszewska S, Ahmed L. The concepts of expectations and satisfaction: Do they capture the way patients evaluate their care? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 1999, 29 (2): 364–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels N. Understanding physician power: A review of the social transformation of American medicine. In Starr, The social Transformation of American Medicine, 1983, New York: Basic Books (pp. 347–357).
   Google Scholar
• Gerteis M., Edgman-Levitan S, Daley J, Delbanco TL (Editors). Through the patient’s eyes: Understanding and promoting patient-centered care. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Lancero AW, Gerber RM. Comparing work satisfaction in two case management models. Nursing Management, 1995, 26 (11): 45–48.
   Google Scholar
• Glenn ML. Structurally determined conflicts in health care. Family Systems Medicine, 1987, 5 (4): 413–427.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson VA, Hunter D, Shortt SE. Accountability in public health Units. Canadian Journal of Public Health; 2003, Sep/Oct (94): 391–396.
   Google Scholar
• Mariano C. The case for interdisciplinary collaboration. Nursing Outlook, 1998, 37 (6): 285–288.
   Google Scholar
• Makaram S. Interprofessional cooperation. Medical Education, 1995, 29(Supplement 1):65–69.
   Google Scholar
• Drinka TJK. Interdisciplinary geriatric teams: Approaches to conflict as indicator potential tomodel teamwork. Educational Gerontology, 1994, 20: 87–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drinka TJK, Clark PG. Health care team-work: Interdisciplinary practice and teaching. Westport, Conn.: Auburn House, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews MC, Kacmar KM. Discrimination among organizational politics, justice, and support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2001, 22 (4): 347–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes EJ, Fitzsimons V. Education: The key for holistic interdisciplinary collaboration. Holistic Nursing Practice, 1993, 7 (4): 1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clarke CL, Wilcockson J. (2002). Seeing need and developing care: Exploring knowledge for and from practice. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2002. 39: 397–406.
   Google Scholar
• Poulin SE, Walter CA, Walker IL. Interdisciplinary team membership: A survey of gerontological social workers. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 1994, 22 (1/2): 93 B 107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindeke LL, Block DE. (1998). Maintaining professional integrity in the midst of interdisciplinary collaboration. Nursing Outlook, 1998,46:213 B 218.
   Google Scholar
• Jimmieson NIL, Griffm MA. Linking client and employee perception of the organization: A study of client satisfaction with healthcare services. Journal of Occupational and Organization Psychology. 1998, 71(Part I): 81–97.
   Google Scholar
• American Association of Colleges of Nursing. [web site on the Internet]. Interdisciplinary education and practice. Position statement. 1995 [cited April 10, 20051, Author. Availablefrom: http://www.aacn.nche.edu/Publications/positions/interdis.htm
   Google Scholar
• Gardebring SS (Chair). Developing health care teams. A report by the Academic Health Center Task Force on Interdisciplinary Health Team Development, University of Minnesota, 1996. [monograph on the Internet] 1996 [cited Nov. 5, 2002 ], Available from: http://www.umdnj.edu.meg.clinedinterdisciplianry.htm
   Google Scholar
• Drinka TJK. Applying learning from self-directed work teams in business to curriculum development for interdisciplinary geriatric teams. Educational Gerontology, 1996, 22: 433–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark P. Values in health care professional socialization: Implications for geriatric education in interdisciplinary teamwork. The Gerontologist, 1997, 37 (4): 441–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallin, A. (2001). Interdisciplinary practice - a matter to teamwork: An integrated literature review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 10, 419–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CNA/CMA. Working together; A joint Canadian Nurses Association/Canadian Medical Association collaborative practice project B Background Paper, March 25.CNA/CMA, 1996
   Google Scholar
• Ivey SL, Brown KS, Teske Y, Silverman D. A model for teaching about interdisciplinary practice in health care settings. Journal of Allied Health, August, 1988, 189 B 195.
   Google Scholar
• Goh SC. Managing effective knowledge transfer: An integrative framework and some practice implications. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2002, 6 (1): 23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Laschinger HKS, Almost J, Tuer-Hodes D. Workplace empowerment and magnet hospital characteristics: Making the link. Journal of Nursing Administration, 2003, 33(7/8): 410–422.
   Google Scholar
• Minnesota Rural Health School. Overcoming barriers to collaborative teamwork. [,pmpgra[j pm the Internet], [cited Nov. 5, 20021 Available from: http://www.umdnj.edu/meg/clinedinterdisciplinary.htm. (no date).
   Google Scholar
• Heinemann GD, Schmitt MH, Farrell MP, Brallier SA. Development of an attitudes toward health care teams scale. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 1999, 22 (1), 123–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casto RM, Julia MC. Interprofessional care and collaborative practice. Commission on Interprofessional Education and Practice. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Ingersoll GI, Schmitt M. Interdisciplinary collaboration, team functioning, and patient safety. Appendix B. In Keeping Patients Safe: Transforming the Work Environment of Nurses. The National Academy of Science, 2004: 341–383.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke-Collier T. (1998). Collaborative prac-tice: Beyond the bureaucratic shadow. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery, 1998, 43 (1): 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Hill A. Multiprofessoinal teamwork in hospital palliative care teams. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 1998, 4 (5): 214–221.
   Google Scholar
• Cook SS. Evaluating the merits of interdisciplinary education. Nursing Times, 2002,98 (41): 30–32.
   Google Scholar
• Baggs JG, Schmitt MH. Nurses and resident physicians’ perceptions of the process of collaboration in a MICU. Research in Nursing & Health, 1997, 20: 71–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechairo-Marino AE, Jordan-March M, Traiger G, Saulo M. Nurse/physician col-laboration: action research and the lessons learned. Journal of Nursing Administration, 2001, 31 (5): 223–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Nasca TJ, Fields SK, Cicchetti A, Scalzo AL, et. al. Comparisons of American, Israeli, Italian and Mexican physicians and nurses on the total and factor scores of the Jefferson scale of attributes toward physician-nurse collaborative relationships. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2003, 40: 427–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojat M, Fields SK, Veloski JJ, Griffiths M, Cohen MJM, Plumb JD. Psychometric properties of an attitude scale measuring physi-cian-nurse collaboration. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 1999, 22 (2): 208–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havens DS, Vasey J. Measuring staff nurse decisional involvement: The decisional involvement scale. Journal of Nursing Administration, 2003, 33 (6): 331–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollins NIL, Townsend SC. Opportunity model of collaboration: A model for assessment instrument development. Journal of Applied Health, 2003, 32: 221–226.
   Google Scholar
• Shorten SM, Rousseau DM, Gillies RR, Devers KJ, Simons TL. Organizational assessment in intensive care units (ICUs): Construct development, reliability, and validity of the ICU nurse-physician questionnaire. Medical Care, 1991, 29 (8): 709–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen DB. Interpretation of group behavior. Nursing Management, 1993, 24 (3): 49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Temkin-Greener H, Gross D, Kunitz SJ, Mu-kamel D. Measuring interdisciplinary team performance in a long-term care setting. Medical Care, 2004, 42 (5): 472–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawk C, Buckwalter K, Bryd L, Cigelman S, Dorfman L, Ferguson K. Health professions students’ perceptions of interprofessional relationships. Academic Medicine,2002, 77 (4): 354–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo JR, House RJ, Lirtzman SI. Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly,1970,15 (2): 150–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Medical Decision Making, 1993, 15: 25–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Huntington R. Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1986, 71 (3): 500–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Cummings J, Armeli S, Lynch P. Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction. Jour-nal of Applied Psychology, 1997, 82 (5): 812–820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor WE, Morrison TG. A comparison of situational and dispositional predictors of perceptions of organizational politics. The Journal of Psychology, 2001, 135 (3): 301–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kacmar KM, Ferris GR. (1991) Perceptions or organizational politics scale (POPS): Development and construct validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1991, 51: 193–205.
   Google Scholar
• Laschinger HKS, Finegan J, Shamian J, Wilk P. Impact of structural and psychological empowerment on job strain in nursing work settings: expanding Kanter’s model. Journal of nursing Administration, 2001, 31 (5): 260–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day DV, Gronn P. Salas E. Leadership capacity in teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 2004, 15: 857–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laing A, Hogg G. Political exhortation, patient expectation and professional execution: Perspectives on the consumerization of healthcare. British Journal of Management, 2002, 13, 173–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin DWC. Some historical notes on interdisciplinary and interprofessional education and practice in health care in the U.S.A. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 1996, 10 (2): 173–187.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll-Johnson RM. Redefining interdisciplinary practice. Oncology Nursing Forum, 2001. 28 (4): 619.
   Google Scholar